DDI_LAC_2017_ES_v02_M_v01_A_LT_WB Development Data Group 2018-09-06 NADA DDI Document - Version 02 - (04/27/21) This version is identical to DDI_LAC_2017_ES_v01_M_v01_A_LT_WB but country field has been updated to capture all the countries covered by survey. v01 (September 2018) Mapping the Landscape of Transactions: The Governance of Business Relations in Latin America 2017-2018 ES 2017-2018 LAC_2017_ES_v01_M_v01_A_LT David C. Francis Nona Karalashvili Peter Murrell NADA World Bank Group’s Knowledge for Change Program Nona Karalashvili Peter Murrell Nona Karalashvili Enterprise Survey [en/oth] - v0.1: Edited anonymous dataset for public distribution The survey data accompanies the working paper, "Mapping the Landscape of Transactions the Governance of Business Relations in Latin America”. This paper provides a picture of the landscape of transactions and one of the central motivations for this analysis is to ascertain whether there are meaningful patterns that emerge from datasets on how firms make agreements with their suppliers and customers. A new set of survey questions is used to map governance structures that firms employ to support the successful implementation of transactions. Without imposing any a priori model, latent class analysis (LCA) discovers meaningful patterns of governance structures that readily match constructs in the literature. All governance structures use bilateralism. Bilateralism and formal institutions are sometimes complemented but never substitutes. For each firm, LCA provides estimates of the posterior probability that the firm uses each of the discovered governance structures. These estimates can be used by researchers to go further, testing their own hypotheses relevant to Williamson’s discriminating alignment agenda using additional data from the Enterprise Surveys or elsewhere. Variations in the effectiveness of different governance structures across countries and across different types of firms and transactions are explored. Regional variation within countries is greater than cross-country variation. Foreign-owned firms, exporters, larger firms, and better-managed ones are more likely to use governance structures that complement bilateralism with use of the legal system or with the help of paid third-parties. The responses were used to a unique set of questions posed in 2017 and 2018 as part of the ES implemented in six Latin American countries: Argentina, Bolivia, Ecuador, Paraguay, Peru, and Uruguay. The surveys are based on interviews with business owners and top managers in a sample of officially registered firms with at least five employees in the manufacturing and services sectors. The surveys are designed to be nationally representative, using a stratified survey design. Argentina Bolivia Ecuador Peru Paraguay Uruguay The surveys are designed to be nationally representative (implemented in Argentina, Bolivia, Ecuador, Paraguay, Peru, and Uruguay). The primary sampling unit of the study is the establishment. The surveys are based on interviews with business owners and top managers in a sample of officially registered firms with at least five employees in the manufacturing and services sectors. Sample survey data [ssd] The scope of this survey includes: - Resolving or preventing problems with suppliers - Resolving or preventing problems with customers The sampling methodology of the World Bank’s Enterprise Survey generates sample sizes appropriate to achieve two main objectives: first, to benchmark the investment climate of individual economies across the world and, second, to conduct firm performance analyses focusing mainly on how investment climate constraints affect productivity and job creation in selected sectors. To achieve both objectives the sampling methodology: - Generates a sample representative of the whole non-agricultural private economy that substantiates assertions about this part of the economy, not only about the manufacturing sector. The overall sample should include, in addition to selected manufacturing industries, services industries and other relevant sectors of the economy; and - Generates large enough sample sizes for selected industries to conduct statistically robust analyses with levels of precision at a minimum 7.5% precision for 90% confidence intervals about: i. Estimates of population proportions (percentages), at the industry level; and ii. Estimates of the mean of log of sales at the industry level. STRATIFICATION The population of industries to be included in the Enterprise Surveys and Indicator Surveys, the Universe of the study, includes the following list (according to ISIC, revision 3.1): all manufacturing sectors (group D), construction (group F), services (groups G and H), transport, storage, and communications (group I), and subsector 72 (from Group K). Also, to limit the surveys to the formal economy the sample frame for each country should include only establishments with five (5) or more employees. Fully government owned firms are excluded as the Universe is defined as the non-agricultural private sector. SAMPLE SIZE Overall sample sizes for both Enterprise Surveys and Indicator Surveys are determined by the degree of stratification of the sample. The overall sample size depends on the decision of the sample size for each level of stratification. In all ES and IS the objectives of stratification are to allow an acceptable level of precision for estimates, at, first, different first, within size levels (small, medium, and large), second, at the different levels of regional stratification, and third, for the different sectors of stratification (which, as explained before, are chosen depending on the size of the economy). Given that both the Enterprise Survey and the Indicator Survey include more than 100 indicators the computation of the minimum sample size required is complicated since it depends on the variance of each indicator. However, many of the indicators computed from the survey are proportions, such as percentage of firms that engage in X activity or chose Y action. In this case the computation of the sample size is simplified by the fact that the variance of a proportion is bounded. Assuming the maximum variance (0.5) the minimum level of precision is guaranteed. Computer Assisted Personal Interview [capi] As part of the implementation of the surveys, twelve newly designed questions were administered, six concerning interactions with the firms’ suppliers and six on customer interactions. These questions were on the effectiveness of various methods of preventing or resolving problems when implementing agreements. When designing questions to be administered in a long survey and addressed to firms of all types, in different institutional settings, both conceptual and practical issues immediately arise. Interviews were conducted face-to-face using tablet devices (CAPI) and covered a wide range of topics. All interviews were conducted by local contractors in Spanish. The data includes sampling weights. All results are obtained with proper use of these weights and thus refer to the entire population of establishments in the six countries. The model parameters that authors use to estimate posterior probabilities are obtained from the software Latent GOLD (Vermunt and Magidson 2016), which does not provide exact parameters and applies some rounding (See the Excel file with estimated model parameters, attached as Related Material). As a result, the estimates of posterior probabilities calculated from the estimated model parameters differ somewhat from the estimates that are obtained directly from the Latent GOLD output. Non-response rates due to respondents spontaneously answering “Don’t Know” (which was not displayed as a possible option in the ‘show card’ listing possible responses). Fewer than 3% of the respondents chose at least one “Don’t Know” across the six questions about the methods of governing relations with suppliers and customers. The question with the most frequent occurrence of “Don’t Know” on relations with suppliers is on paid private dispute resolution (1.4% of the sample); for relations with customers, the question about personal trust had the highest item non-response (1.2% of the sample). Given the low item non-response rates, in our application of LCA we drop observations that have at least one “Don’t Know” in the relevant series of questions. This leaves 3,350 observations on relations with suppliers (97.7% of the sample), and 3,339 observations on relations with customers (97.3% of the sample). Nona Karalashvili Peter Murrell Francis, David C.; Karalashvili, Nona; Murrell, Peter. 2018. Mapping the landscape of transactions: the governance of business relations in Latin America (English). Policy Research working paper; no. WPS 8564; Paper is funded by the Knowledge for Change Program (KCP). Washington, D.C.: World Bank Group. http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/524361534957836994/Mapping-the-landscape-of-transactions-the-governance-of-business-relations-in-Latin-America The user of the data acknowledges that the original collector of the data, the authorized distributor of the data, and the relevant funding agency bear no responsibility for use of the data or for interpretations or inferences based upon such uses. Estimated Posteriors for Each Possible Response Pattern_Customer Relations Contains estimates of the posterior probability of using each of the discovered governance structures for the full spectrum of possible response patterns. With six questions, each with five categories of responses, there are 15,625 possible response patterns. The ES respondents use far fewer than this. For relations with customers, we observe 631. This data set thus enables other researchers to use their own survey data and obtain posterior probabilities for their observed patterns of responses. 15625 16 Estimated Posteriors for Each Possible Response Pattern_Supplier Relations Contains estimates of the posterior probability of using each of the discovered governance structures for the full spectrum of possible response patterns. With six questions, each with five categories of responses, there are 15,625 possible response patterns. The ES respondents use far fewer than this. For relations with suppliers, we observe 711 distinct combinations of answers. This data file thus enables other researchers to use their own survey data and obtain posterior probabilities for their observed patterns of responses. 15625 16 Landscape of Transactions_Data on Customer Relations The data set contains: (i) the survey responses to the corresponding series of questions, (ii) estimates produced by Latent GOLD of the posterior probability that each firm uses each of the discovered governance structures, and (iii) the unique identifier that enables one-to-one matching of each firm with the full ES data (variable idstd), along with the country identifier, sampling weights, and the stratum of each firm. 3339 15 Landscape of Transactions_Data on Supplier Relations The data set contains: (i) the survey responses to the corresponding series of questions, (ii) estimates produced by Latent GOLD of the posterior probability that each firm uses each of the discovered governance structures, and (iii) the unique identifier that enables one-to-one matching of each firm with the full ES data (variable idstd), along with the country identifier, sampling weights, and the stratum of each firm. 3350 15 WEB STD FIRMID WEB STD FIRMID WEB STD FIRMID WEB STD FIRMID WEB STD FIRMID 3350 -9 Don't know (spontaneous) -8 Refusal (spontaneous) -7 Does not apply Country Code Country Code Country Code Country Code Country Code 3350 1 Argentina 2 Bolivia 3 Ecuador 4 Paraguay 5 Peru 6 Uruguay To What Degree is the Following Effective: Personal Relationship and Trust? To What Degree is the Following Effective: Personal Relationship and Trust? To What Degree is the Following Effective: Personal Relationship and Trust? To What Degree is the Following Effective: Personal Relationship and Trust? To What Degree is the Following Effective: Personal Relationship and Trust? When making agreements with suppliers, please indicate to what degree each of the following is effective in resolving or preventing problems. - Personal relationship and trust 3350 1 Not at all 2 Slightly 3 Moderately 4 Very much 5 Extremely To What Degree is the Following Effective: Mutual Interests? To What Degree is the Following Effective: Mutual Interests? To What Degree is the Following Effective: Mutual Interests? To What Degree is the Following Effective: Mutual Interests? To What Degree is the Following Effective: Mutual Interests? When making agreements with suppliers, please indicate to what degree each of the following is effective in resolving or preventing problems. - Mutual interest in maintaining business relationship, without involving others 3350 1 Not at all 2 Slightly 3 Moderately 4 Very much 5 Extremely To What Degree is the Following Effective: Paid, Private Dispute Resolution? To What Degree is the Following Effective: Paid, Private Dispute Resolution? To What Degree is the Following Effective: Paid, Private Dispute Resolution? To What Degree is the Following Effective: Paid, Private Dispute Resolution? To What Degree is the Following Effective: Paid, Private Dispute Resolution? When making agreements with suppliers, please indicate to what degree each of the following is effective in resolving or preventing problems. - Paid, private dispute resolution 3350 1 Not at all 2 Slightly 3 Moderately 4 Very much 5 Extremely To What Degree is the Following Effective: Assistance of Government officials? To What Degree is the Following Effective: Assistance of Government officials? To What Degree is the Following Effective: Assistance of Government officials? To What Degree is the Following Effective: Assistance of Government officials? To What Degree is the Following Effective: Assistance of Government officials? When making agreements with suppliers, please indicate to what degree each of the following is effective in resolving or preventing problems. - Assistance of government officials 3350 1 Not at all 2 Slightly 3 Moderately 4 Very much 5 Extremely To What Degree is the Following Effective: Intervention of Other Third-Parties? To What Degree is the Following Effective: Intervention of Other Third-Parties? To What Degree is the Following Effective: Intervention of Other Third-Parties? To What Degree is the Following Effective: Intervention of Other Third-Parties? To What Degree is the Following Effective: Intervention of Other Third-Parties? When making agreements with suppliers, please indicate to what degree each of the following is effective in resolving or preventing problems. - Intervention of other third-parties (excluding paid, private dispute resolution and government officials) 3350 1 Not at all 2 Slightly 3 Moderately 4 Very much 5 Extremely To What Degree is the Following Effective: Legal System? To What Degree is the Following Effective: Legal System? To What Degree is the Following Effective: Legal System? To What Degree is the Following Effective: Legal System? To What Degree is the Following Effective: Legal System? When making agreements with suppliers, please indicate to what degree each of the following is effective in resolving or preventing problems. - Legal system 3350 1 Not at all 2 Slightly 3 Moderately 4 Very much 5 Extremely LatentGOLD poster. prob. of pure bilateralism LatentGOLD poster. prob. of pure bilateralism LatentGOLD poster. prob. of pure bilateralism LatentGOLD poster. prob. of pure bilateralism LatentGOLD poster. prob. of pure bilateralism 3350 1.11e-08 1 LatentGOLD poster. prob. of bilateralism with private support LatentGOLD poster. prob. of bilateralism with private support LatentGOLD poster. prob. of bilateralism with private support LatentGOLD poster. prob. of bilateralism with private support LatentGOLD poster. prob. of bilateralism with private support 3350 1.01e-15 1 LatentGOLD poster. prob. of bilateralism with legal support LatentGOLD poster. prob. of bilateralism with legal support LatentGOLD poster. prob. of bilateralism with legal support LatentGOLD poster. prob. of bilateralism with legal support LatentGOLD poster. prob. of bilateralism with legal support 3350 7.9e-13 1 LatentGOLD poster. prob. of strong comprehensive LatentGOLD poster. prob. of strong comprehensive LatentGOLD poster. prob. of strong comprehensive LatentGOLD poster. prob. of strong comprehensive LatentGOLD poster. prob. of strong comprehensive 3350 1.09e-19 1 LatentGOLD Modal Class LatentGOLD Modal Class LatentGOLD Modal Class LatentGOLD Modal Class LatentGOLD Modal Class 3350 1 Pure bilateralism 2 Bilateralism with private support 3 Bilateralism with legal support 4 Strong comprehensive Weight according to median eligibility Weight according to median eligibility Weight according to median eligibility Weight according to median eligibility Weight according to median eligibility 3350 1 395.987 see notes see notes see notes see notes see notes 3350 614216 623534 To What Degree is the Following Effective: Personal Relationship and Trust? To What Degree is the Following Effective: Personal Relationship and Trust? To What Degree is the Following Effective: Personal Relationship and Trust? To What Degree is the Following Effective: Personal Relationship and Trust? To What Degree is the Following Effective: Personal Relationship and Trust? When making agreements with suppliers, please indicate to what degree each of the following is effective in resolving or preventing problems. - Personal relationship and trust 15625 1 Not at all 2 Slightly 3 Moderately 4 Very much 5 Extremely To What Degree is the Following Effective: Mutual Interests? To What Degree is the Following Effective: Mutual Interests? To What Degree is the Following Effective: Mutual Interests? To What Degree is the Following Effective: Mutual Interests? To What Degree is the Following Effective: Mutual Interests? When making agreements with suppliers, please indicate to what degree each of the following is effective in resolving or preventing problems. - Mutual interest in maintaining business relationship, without involving others 15625 1 Not at all 2 Slightly 3 Moderately 4 Very much 5 Extremely To What Degree is the Following Effective: Paid, Private Dispute Resolution? To What Degree is the Following Effective: Paid, Private Dispute Resolution? To What Degree is the Following Effective: Paid, Private Dispute Resolution? To What Degree is the Following Effective: Paid, Private Dispute Resolution? To What Degree is the Following Effective: Paid, Private Dispute Resolution? When making agreements with suppliers, please indicate to what degree each of the following is effective in resolving or preventing problems. - Paid, private dispute resolution 15625 1 Not at all 2 Slightly 3 Moderately 4 Very much 5 Extremely To What Degree is the Following Effective: Assistance of Government officials? To What Degree is the Following Effective: Assistance of Government officials? To What Degree is the Following Effective: Assistance of Government officials? To What Degree is the Following Effective: Assistance of Government officials? To What Degree is the Following Effective: Assistance of Government officials? When making agreements with suppliers, please indicate to what degree each of the following is effective in resolving or preventing problems. - Assistance of government officials 15625 1 Not at all 2 Slightly 3 Moderately 4 Very much 5 Extremely To What Degree is the Following Effective: Intervention of Other Third-Parties? To What Degree is the Following Effective: Intervention of Other Third-Parties? To What Degree is the Following Effective: Intervention of Other Third-Parties? To What Degree is the Following Effective: Intervention of Other Third-Parties? To What Degree is the Following Effective: Intervention of Other Third-Parties? When making agreements with suppliers, please indicate to what degree each of the following is effective in resolving or preventing problems. - Intervention of other third-parties (excluding paid, private dispute resolution and government officials) 15625 1 Not at all 2 Slightly 3 Moderately 4 Very much 5 Extremely To What Degree is the Following Effective: Legal System? To What Degree is the Following Effective: Legal System? To What Degree is the Following Effective: Legal System? To What Degree is the Following Effective: Legal System? To What Degree is the Following Effective: Legal System? When making agreements with suppliers, please indicate to what degree each of the following is effective in resolving or preventing problems. - Legal system 15625 1 Not at all 2 Slightly 3 Moderately 4 Very much 5 Extremely Poster. prob. of pure bilateralism, based on LatentGOLD estimates Poster. prob. of pure bilateralism, based on LatentGOLD estimates Poster. prob. of pure bilateralism, based on LatentGOLD estimates Poster. prob. of pure bilateralism, based on LatentGOLD estimates Poster. prob. of pure bilateralism, based on LatentGOLD estimates 15625 3.76e-10 1 Poster. prob. of bilateralism with private support, based on LatentGOLD estimate Poster. prob. of bilateralism with private support, based on LatentGOLD estimate Poster. prob. of bilateralism with private support, based on LatentGOLD estimate Poster. prob. of bilateralism with private support, based on LatentGOLD estimate Poster. prob. of bilateralism with private support, based on LatentGOLD estimate 15625 9.43e-20 1 Poster. prob. of bilateralism with legal support, based on LatentGOLD estimates Poster. prob. of bilateralism with legal support, based on LatentGOLD estimates Poster. prob. of bilateralism with legal support, based on LatentGOLD estimates Poster. prob. of bilateralism with legal support, based on LatentGOLD estimates Poster. prob. of bilateralism with legal support, based on LatentGOLD estimates 15625 4.52e-18 1 Poster. prob. of strong comprehensive, based on LatentGOLD estimates Poster. prob. of strong comprehensive, based on LatentGOLD estimates Poster. prob. of strong comprehensive, based on LatentGOLD estimates Poster. prob. of strong comprehensive, based on LatentGOLD estimates Poster. prob. of strong comprehensive, based on LatentGOLD estimates 15625 1.44e-20 1 Modal Class, based on LatentGOLD estimates Modal Class, based on LatentGOLD estimates Modal Class, based on LatentGOLD estimates Modal Class, based on LatentGOLD estimates Modal Class, based on LatentGOLD estimates 15625 1 Pure bilateralism 2 Bilateralism with private support 3 Bilateralism with legal support 4 Strong comprehensive LatentGOLD poster. prob. of pure bilateralism LatentGOLD poster. prob. of pure bilateralism LatentGOLD poster. prob. of pure bilateralism LatentGOLD poster. prob. of pure bilateralism LatentGOLD poster. prob. of pure bilateralism 711 14914 1.11e-08 1 LatentGOLD poster. prob. of bilateralism with private support LatentGOLD poster. prob. of bilateralism with private support LatentGOLD poster. prob. of bilateralism with private support LatentGOLD poster. prob. of bilateralism with private support LatentGOLD poster. prob. of bilateralism with private support 711 14914 1.01e-15 1 LatentGOLD poster. prob. of bilateralism with legal support LatentGOLD poster. prob. of bilateralism with legal support LatentGOLD poster. prob. of bilateralism with legal support LatentGOLD poster. prob. of bilateralism with legal support LatentGOLD poster. prob. of bilateralism with legal support 711 14914 7.9e-13 1 LatentGOLD poster. prob. of strong comprehensive LatentGOLD poster. prob. of strong comprehensive LatentGOLD poster. prob. of strong comprehensive LatentGOLD poster. prob. of strong comprehensive LatentGOLD poster. prob. of strong comprehensive 711 14914 1.09e-19 1 LatentGOLD Modal Class LatentGOLD Modal Class LatentGOLD Modal Class LatentGOLD Modal Class LatentGOLD Modal Class 711 14914 1 Pure bilateralism 2 Bilateralism with private support 3 Bilateralism with legal support 4 Strong comprehensive Sysmiss WEB STD FIRMID WEB STD FIRMID WEB STD FIRMID WEB STD FIRMID WEB STD FIRMID 3339 -9 Don't know (spontaneous) -8 Refusal (spontaneous) -7 Does not apply Country Code Country Code Country Code Country Code Country Code 3339 1 Argentina 2 Bolivia 3 Ecuador 4 Paraguay 5 Peru 6 Uruguay To What Degree is the Following Effective: Personal Relationship and Trust? To What Degree is the Following Effective: Personal Relationship and Trust? To What Degree is the Following Effective: Personal Relationship and Trust? To What Degree is the Following Effective: Personal Relationship and Trust? To What Degree is the Following Effective: Personal Relationship and Trust? When making agreements with customers, please indicate to what degree each of the following is effective in resolving or preventing problems. - Personal relationship and trust 3339 1 Not at all 2 Slightly 3 Moderately 4 Very much 5 Extremely To What Degree is the Following Effective: Mutual Interests? To What Degree is the Following Effective: Mutual Interests? To What Degree is the Following Effective: Mutual Interests? To What Degree is the Following Effective: Mutual Interests? To What Degree is the Following Effective: Mutual Interests? When making agreements with customers, please indicate to what degree each of the following is effective in resolving or preventing problems. - Mutual interest in maintaining business relationship, without involving others 3339 1 Not at all 2 Slightly 3 Moderately 4 Very much 5 Extremely To What Degree is the Following Effective: Paid, Private Dispute Resolution? To What Degree is the Following Effective: Paid, Private Dispute Resolution? To What Degree is the Following Effective: Paid, Private Dispute Resolution? To What Degree is the Following Effective: Paid, Private Dispute Resolution? To What Degree is the Following Effective: Paid, Private Dispute Resolution? When making agreements with customers, please indicate to what degree each of the following is effective in resolving or preventing problems. - Paid, private dispute resolution 3339 1 Not at all 2 Slightly 3 Moderately 4 Very much 5 Extremely To What Degree is the Following Effective: Assistance of Government officials? To What Degree is the Following Effective: Assistance of Government officials? To What Degree is the Following Effective: Assistance of Government officials? To What Degree is the Following Effective: Assistance of Government officials? To What Degree is the Following Effective: Assistance of Government officials? When making agreements with customers, please indicate to what degree each of the following is effective in resolving or preventing problems. - Assistance of government officials 3339 1 Not at all 2 Slightly 3 Moderately 4 Very much 5 Extremely To What Degree is the Following Effective: Intervention of Other Third-Parties? To What Degree is the Following Effective: Intervention of Other Third-Parties? To What Degree is the Following Effective: Intervention of Other Third-Parties? To What Degree is the Following Effective: Intervention of Other Third-Parties? To What Degree is the Following Effective: Intervention of Other Third-Parties? When making agreements with customers, please indicate to what degree each of the following is effective in resolving or preventing problems. - Intervention of other third-parties (excluding private dispute resolution and government officials) 3339 1 Not at all 2 Slightly 3 Moderately 4 Very much 5 Extremely To What Degree is the Following Effective: Legal System? To What Degree is the Following Effective: Legal System? To What Degree is the Following Effective: Legal System? To What Degree is the Following Effective: Legal System? To What Degree is the Following Effective: Legal System? When making agreements with customers, please indicate to what degree each of the following is effective in resolving or preventing problems. - Legal system 3339 1 Not at all 2 Slightly 3 Moderately 4 Very much 5 Extremely LatentGOLD poster. prob. of pure bilateralism LatentGOLD poster. prob. of pure bilateralism LatentGOLD poster. prob. of pure bilateralism LatentGOLD poster. prob. of pure bilateralism LatentGOLD poster. prob. of pure bilateralism 3339 2e-25 1 LatentGOLD poster. prob. of bilateralism with private support LatentGOLD poster. prob. of bilateralism with private support LatentGOLD poster. prob. of bilateralism with private support LatentGOLD poster. prob. of bilateralism with private support LatentGOLD poster. prob. of bilateralism with private support 3339 3.95e-20 1 LatentGOLD poster. prob. of bilateralism with weak support LatentGOLD poster. prob. of bilateralism with weak support LatentGOLD poster. prob. of bilateralism with weak support LatentGOLD poster. prob. of bilateralism with weak support LatentGOLD poster. prob. of bilateralism with weak support 3339 6.97e-25 1 LatentGOLD poster. prob. of weak comprehensive LatentGOLD poster. prob. of weak comprehensive LatentGOLD poster. prob. of weak comprehensive LatentGOLD poster. prob. of weak comprehensive LatentGOLD poster. prob. of weak comprehensive 3339 4.83e-21 1 LatentGOLD Modal Class LatentGOLD Modal Class LatentGOLD Modal Class LatentGOLD Modal Class LatentGOLD Modal Class 3339 1 Pure bilateralism 2 Bilateralism with private support 3 Bilateralism with weak support 4 Weak comprehensive Weight according to median eligibility Weight according to median eligibility Weight according to median eligibility Weight according to median eligibility Weight according to median eligibility 3339 1 395.987 see notes see notes see notes see notes see notes 3339 614216 623534 To What Degree is the Following Effective: Personal Relationship and Trust? To What Degree is the Following Effective: Personal Relationship and Trust? To What Degree is the Following Effective: Personal Relationship and Trust? To What Degree is the Following Effective: Personal Relationship and Trust? To What Degree is the Following Effective: Personal Relationship and Trust? When making agreements with customers, please indicate to what degree each of the following is effective in resolving or preventing problems. - Personal relationship and trust 15625 1 Not at all 2 Slightly 3 Moderately 4 Very much 5 Extremely To What Degree is the Following Effective: Mutual Interests? To What Degree is the Following Effective: Mutual Interests? To What Degree is the Following Effective: Mutual Interests? To What Degree is the Following Effective: Mutual Interests? To What Degree is the Following Effective: Mutual Interests? When making agreements with customers, please indicate to what degree each of the following is effective in resolving or preventing problems. - Mutual interest in maintaining business relationship, without involving others 15625 1 Not at all 2 Slightly 3 Moderately 4 Very much 5 Extremely To What Degree is the Following Effective: Paid, Private Dispute Resolution? To What Degree is the Following Effective: Paid, Private Dispute Resolution? To What Degree is the Following Effective: Paid, Private Dispute Resolution? To What Degree is the Following Effective: Paid, Private Dispute Resolution? To What Degree is the Following Effective: Paid, Private Dispute Resolution? When making agreements with customers, please indicate to what degree each of the following is effective in resolving or preventing problems. - Paid, private dispute resolution 15625 1 Not at all 2 Slightly 3 Moderately 4 Very much 5 Extremely To What Degree is the Following Effective: Assistance of Government officials? To What Degree is the Following Effective: Assistance of Government officials? To What Degree is the Following Effective: Assistance of Government officials? To What Degree is the Following Effective: Assistance of Government officials? To What Degree is the Following Effective: Assistance of Government officials? When making agreements with customers, please indicate to what degree each of the following is effective in resolving or preventing problems. - Assistance of government officials 15625 1 Not at all 2 Slightly 3 Moderately 4 Very much 5 Extremely To What Degree is the Following Effective: Intervention of Other Third-Parties? To What Degree is the Following Effective: Intervention of Other Third-Parties? To What Degree is the Following Effective: Intervention of Other Third-Parties? To What Degree is the Following Effective: Intervention of Other Third-Parties? To What Degree is the Following Effective: Intervention of Other Third-Parties? When making agreements with customers, please indicate to what degree each of the following is effective in resolving or preventing problems. - Intervention of other third-parties (excluding private dispute resolution and government officials) 15625 1 Not at all 2 Slightly 3 Moderately 4 Very much 5 Extremely To What Degree is the Following Effective: Legal System? To What Degree is the Following Effective: Legal System? To What Degree is the Following Effective: Legal System? To What Degree is the Following Effective: Legal System? To What Degree is the Following Effective: Legal System? When making agreements with customers, please indicate to what degree each of the following is effective in resolving or preventing problems. - Legal system 15625 1 Not at all 2 Slightly 3 Moderately 4 Very much 5 Extremely Poster. prob. of pure bilateralism, based on LatentGOLD estimates Poster. prob. of pure bilateralism, based on LatentGOLD estimates Poster. prob. of pure bilateralism, based on LatentGOLD estimates Poster. prob. of pure bilateralism, based on LatentGOLD estimates Poster. prob. of pure bilateralism, based on LatentGOLD estimates 15625 4.71e-36 1 Poster. prob. of bilateralism with private support, based on LatentGOLD estimate Poster. prob. of bilateralism with private support, based on LatentGOLD estimate Poster. prob. of bilateralism with private support, based on LatentGOLD estimate Poster. prob. of bilateralism with private support, based on LatentGOLD estimate Poster. prob. of bilateralism with private support, based on LatentGOLD estimate 15625 9.46e-29 1 Poster. prob. of bilateralism with weak support, based on LatentGOLD estimates Poster. prob. of bilateralism with weak support, based on LatentGOLD estimates Poster. prob. of bilateralism with weak support, based on LatentGOLD estimates Poster. prob. of bilateralism with weak support, based on LatentGOLD estimates Poster. prob. of bilateralism with weak support, based on LatentGOLD estimates 15625 7.49e-34 1 Poster. prob. of weak comprehensive, based on LatentGOLD estimates Poster. prob. of weak comprehensive, based on LatentGOLD estimates Poster. prob. of weak comprehensive, based on LatentGOLD estimates Poster. prob. of weak comprehensive, based on LatentGOLD estimates Poster. prob. of weak comprehensive, based on LatentGOLD estimates 15625 4.86e-24 1 Modal Class, based on LatentGOLD estimates Modal Class, based on LatentGOLD estimates Modal Class, based on LatentGOLD estimates Modal Class, based on LatentGOLD estimates Modal Class, based on LatentGOLD estimates 15625 1 Pure bilateralism 2 Bilateralism with private support 3 Bilateralism with weak support 4 Weak comprehensive LatentGOLD poster. prob. of pure bilateralism LatentGOLD poster. prob. of pure bilateralism LatentGOLD poster. prob. of pure bilateralism LatentGOLD poster. prob. of pure bilateralism LatentGOLD poster. prob. of pure bilateralism 631 14994 2e-25 1 LatentGOLD poster. prob. of bilateralism with private support LatentGOLD poster. prob. of bilateralism with private support LatentGOLD poster. prob. of bilateralism with private support LatentGOLD poster. prob. of bilateralism with private support LatentGOLD poster. prob. of bilateralism with private support 631 14994 3.95e-20 1 LatentGOLD poster. prob. of bilateralism with weak support LatentGOLD poster. prob. of bilateralism with weak support LatentGOLD poster. prob. of bilateralism with weak support LatentGOLD poster. prob. of bilateralism with weak support LatentGOLD poster. prob. of bilateralism with weak support 631 14994 6.97e-25 1 LatentGOLD poster. prob. of weak comprehensive LatentGOLD poster. prob. of weak comprehensive LatentGOLD poster. prob. of weak comprehensive LatentGOLD poster. prob. of weak comprehensive LatentGOLD poster. prob. of weak comprehensive 631 14994 4.83e-21 1 LatentGOLD Modal Class LatentGOLD Modal Class LatentGOLD Modal Class LatentGOLD Modal Class LatentGOLD Modal Class 631 14994 1 Pure bilateralism 2 Bilateralism with private support 3 Bilateralism with weak support 4 Weak comprehensive Sysmiss