{"doc_desc":{"title":"UKR_2019_MSP_v01_M","idno":"DDI_UKR_2019_MSP_v01_M","producers":[{"name":"UN Refugee Agency","abbreviation":"UNHCR","affiliation":"UN","role":"Documentation of the study"},{"name":"Development Economics Data Group","abbreviation":"DECDG","affiliation":"The World Bank","role":"Metadata adapted for Microdata Library"}],"prod_date":"2021-12","version_statement":{"version":"Version 01 (May 2022): This metadata was downloaded from the UNHCR Microdata Library catalog (https:\/\/microdata.unhcr.org\/index.php). The following two metadata fields were edited - Document and Survey ID."}},"study_desc":{"title_statement":{"idno":"UKR_2019_MSP_v01_M","title":"Monitoring of the Shelter Programme 2019","alt_title":"MSP 2019"},"authoring_entity":[{"name":"UN Refugee Agency (UNHCR)","affiliation":"UN"}],"distribution_statement":{"contact":[{"name":"Curation Team","affiliation":"UN Refugee Agency","email":"microdata@unhcr.org","uri":"https:\/\/microdata.unhcr.org"}]},"series_statement":{"series_name":"Socio-Economic\/Monitoring Survey [hh\/sems]"},"version_statement":{"version":"Edited, anonymous dataset for licensed distribution.","version_date":"2021-12-21"},"study_info":{"topics":[{"topic":"Emergency Shelter and NFI","vocab":"","uri":""},{"topic":"Community Services","vocab":"","uri":""},{"topic":"Logistics","vocab":"","uri":""},{"topic":"Peace Building\/Conflict Prevention Sector","vocab":"","uri":""},{"topic":"Housing, Land and Property","vocab":"","uri":""},{"topic":"Legal Assistance\/Protection","vocab":"","uri":""},{"topic":"Shelter\/Other Infrastructure","vocab":"","uri":""},{"topic":"Domestic Needs\/Household Support","vocab":"","uri":""}],"abstract":"The monitoring of 2019 shelter confirms the main findings of the previous years: the repair of houses damaged by conflict-related incidents continue to be highly appreciated by recipients (91 per cent of respondents) and executed with good quality (almost 100 per cent of cases).\n\nIn only one case out of 433 the repair works were deemed by the monitoring team as being not in accordance with the locally accepted standards and good construction practices. For comparison, there were seven such cases (less than 2 per cent) in 2018 and none in 2017.","coll_dates":[{"start":"2019-10-03","end":"2020-04-30","cycle":""}],"nation":[{"name":"Ukraine","abbreviation":"UKR"}],"geog_coverage":"Mariupol, Sloviansk and Severodonetsk, and Donetsk and Luhansk","analysis_unit":"Households","universe":"All 1316 repairs conducted by UNHCR between October 2019 and April 2020.","data_kind":"Sample survey data [ssd]","notes":"The study covered the following topics:\nGeographical characteristics of repaired shelter; beneficiary's information and protection assessment; vulnerability criteria; safety; technical assessments of buildings; satisfaction with repairs; access to basic services."},"method":{"data_collection":{"data_collectors":[{"name":"UN Refugee Agency","abbreviation":"UNHCR","affiliation":"UN"}],"sampling_procedure":"The monitored sample covers repairs completed in the geographic areas of four of the five UNHCR offices in eastern Ukraine: Mariupol, Sloviansk and Sievierodonetsk in government-controlled areas (GCA); and Donetsk in non-government-controlled areas (NGCA). Last year, Luhansk office in NGCA was not allowed to implement field visits and therefore could not contribute to the 2019 monitoring exercise.\n\nNonrandom sample (purposive), selected to comply with 3 principles: \n- to cover as many areas as possible to capture the different conditions in which house repairs are conducted, while giving priority to areas with difficult access and conditions\n- to accord priority to problematic cases (in terms of technical or protection-related issues)\n- to cover all types of repairs, but giving priority to interventions that have required high investments in terms of time and money (heavy repairs and reconstructions)","coll_mode":["Computer Assisted Telephone Interview [cati]"],"research_instrument":"The survey questionnaire\/ form consisted of the following sections:\n- Survey details\n- Location\n- Beneficiary's info\n- Technical assessment\n- Quality assessment\/ satisfaction level\n- Selection and vulnerability criteria\n- Safety\n- Access to basic services\n- Sustainability of the intervention\n- Other comments\/ important information","coll_situation":"The monitoring visits took place between October 2019 and April 2020 and were performed by UNHCR teams composed of at least two members, one from the shelter team and one from the protection unit.\n\nThe collection of the information was based on the standard Kobo Shelter Monitoring Form (is provided in the Documentation tab). The form has two main sections, one focusing on technical aspects, the other on protection. A few changes to the questionnaire were introduced in 2019, mainly to capture the feedback on cash-based interventions; all changes, though, comply with the principle of preserving the comparability of data and findings across the implementation years.\n\nAll visits were conducted in accordance with the recommendations included in the Standard Operating Procedures for Shelter (see Annex 4 of the report) and the dedicated guidelines (see Annex 5 of the report)."}},"data_access":{"dataset_use":{"contact":[{"name":"Curation Team","affiliation":"UN Refugee Agency","email":"microdata@unhcr.org","uri":"https:\/\/microdata.unhcr.org"}],"cit_req":"UNHCR (2021). Ukraine: Shelter Monitoring 2019. Accessed from https:\/\/microdata.unhcr.org"}}},"schematype":"survey","tags":[{"tag":"noDOI"}]}