{"doc_desc":{"title":"ETH_2010_FSPIE_v01_M","idno":"DDI_ETH_2010_FSPIE_v01_M_WB","producers":[{"name":"Development Economics Data Group","abbreviation":"DECDG","affiliation":"The World Bank","role":"Documentation of the Study"}],"prod_date":"2017-07-27","version_statement":{"version":"Version 01 (July 2017)"}},"study_desc":{"title_statement":{"idno":"ETH_2010_FSPIE_v01_M","title":"Impact Evaluation of the Food Security Project for Poorer Rural Households in Ethiopia 2010","alt_title":"FSPIE 2010"},"authoring_entity":[{"name":"Markus Goldstein","affiliation":"The World Bank"}],"distribution_statement":{"contact":[{"name":"Markus Goldstein","affiliation":"World Bank","email":"mgoldstein@worldbank.org","uri":""},{"name":"Michael O'Sullivan","affiliation":"World Bank","email":"mosullivan@worldbank.org","uri":""},{"name":"Microdata Library","affiliation":"World Bank","email":"","uri":""}]},"study_info":{"keywords":[{"keyword":"Food Security","vocab":"","uri":""},{"keyword":"Nutrition","vocab":"","uri":""},{"keyword":"Food Markets & Prices","vocab":"","uri":""},{"keyword":"Off-Farm Income","vocab":"","uri":""},{"keyword":"Rural Development","vocab":"","uri":""},{"keyword":"Child Health","vocab":"","uri":""},{"keyword":"Agriculture","vocab":"","uri":""},{"keyword":"Sustainable Development","vocab":"","uri":""}],"abstract":"At the time of Appraisal of the Food Security Project, Ethiopia was a post-conflict state having just emerged from a two-year long armed conflict with Eritrea. Though the conflict resulted in a suspension of development assistance, an Interim Strategy Note (ISN) was put in place in November 2000 to guide the World Bank\u2019s post-conflict recovery program. This ISN guided much of the strategy for the Food Security Project\u2019s design. District governments, or woredas, were largely responsible for delivering services. Though the agricultural sector remained underemployed, it was still the largest sector of the economy, meaning there was little opportunity outside rural areas for non-farming activities. Poor rural households also lacked sufficient access to the microfinance sector. Droughts and food price escalation caused massive food insecurity for around 7-13 million people. The Food Security Project (FSP) wanted to shift assistance focus away from short term temporary fixes toward addressing long-term problems of food insecurity. The FSP was designed to comprise 5 components: (i) grants to communities and kebeles, including community-level assets building, household asset building and income generating activities, and child growth promotion; (ii) capacity building for woredas, regions, and federal ministries; (iii) food marketing initiatives, including improved management of food aid, establishment of a food market information system, development of a warehouse receipt and inventory credit system for traders, and development of a competitive and efficient market in warehousing services; (iv) communications and public education; and (v) project administration and impact evaluation. While these components were edited before the culmination of the project, they generally remained. The project development objective was to build the resource base of poorer rural households, increase their employment and incomes, and improve their nutrition levels, especially for children under five years of age, pregnant and lactating women. A major benefit of FSP participation is access to credit. Documented outcomes included: (i) small increase in the number of months FSP households were food secure and a small decrease in number of months of food consumption covered by own resources; (ii) positive effect on caregivers\u2019 knowledge of and behavior regarding child nutrition; (iii) FSP households slightly less likely to have had at least one shock in the last five years and less likely to have used savings or a loan to buy food; and (iv) FSP households reported an increase of off-farm work.","time_periods":[{"start":"2010-07-25","end":"2010-09-29","cycle":"R1"}],"coll_dates":[{"start":"2010-07-25","end":"2010-09-29","cycle":"R1"}],"nation":[{"name":"Ethiopia","abbreviation":"ETH"}],"geog_coverage":"Rural Areas","analysis_unit":"Households\nIndividuals","universe":"The Food Security Project's (FSP) primary target groups were poor rural households, children under age 5, and pregnant and lactating women.","data_kind":"Sample survey data [ssd]","notes":"The survey covered the following themes:\n- Basic Household Characteristics: Household demographics, current household members; Characteristics of the household and the household head; Former household members; Children's education and activities\n- Land, Crop and Forestry Production, and Disposition: Land characteristics and tenure; 2002 Meher crop production; 2002 Belg crop production; 2002 Perennial crops\/forestry production; Household level supply and disposition of crops (annual and perennial), spices, and forestry prducts; Use of labor in agricultural production\n- Household Assets: Household assets (non-land): production equipment, consumer durables; Housing; Livestock ownership; Income from livestock; Distress asset sales\n- Income Apart from Own-Agricultural Activities and Credit: Wage employment; Own business activities; Transfers\n- Access to WB\/CIDA\/Italy Food Security Project and Related Programs: Access to productive safety nets program - public works; Participation in other food security programs (OFSP); Perceptions of benefits of assets created by PSNP and other public works; Perceptions and participation of operations of the WB\/CIDA\/Italy FSP;  Access to credit\n- Consumption: Non-food expenditure on durables and services; Non-food expenditure on household consumables; Food consumption; Food availability, access and coping strategies\n- Health, Illness, Shocks and Poverty Perceptions: Health status; Illness; Child Growth Promotion; Long term shocks and coping mechanisms; Shocks to crops and livestock; Perceptions of poverty and well-being"},"method":{"data_collection":{"sampling_procedure":"The dataset is a product of survey data. The questionnaire was administered by the CSA to 6,000 households in 240 kebeles of which 120 FSP kebeles were selected at random and then the nearest neighboring kebele which was not participating in FSP was also selected.\n\nWithin the non-FSP kebeles, 25 households were selected at random to participate in the survey. In FSP kebeles, a list was compiled of all FSP beneficiaries using FSP program records. From this list 17 households were selected at random to participate in the survey. In addition, among the population of non-beneficiaries, 8 households were selected at random for interviews. \n\nThis sampling structure provides two potential comparison groups to compare to FSP participants: non-beneficiaries within FSP kebeles and those residing in non-FSP kebeles.","coll_mode":["Computer Assisted Personal Interview [capi]"],"research_instrument":"Module 1 - Basic Household Characteristics\nS1A: Household demographics, current household members\nS1B: Characteristics of the household and the household head\nS1C: Former household members\nS2: Children's education and activities\n\nModule 2 - Land, Crop and Forestry Production, and Disposition\nS1: Land characteristics and tenure\nS2A: 2002 Meher crop production\nS2B: 2002 Belg crop production\nS2C: 2002 Perennial crops\/forestry production\nS3: Household level supply and disposition of crops (annual and perennial), spices, and forestry prducts\nS4: Use of labor in agricultural production\n\nModule 3 - Household Assets\nS1: Household assets (non-land): production equipment, consumer durables\nS2: Housing\nS3: Livestock ownership\nS4: Income from livestock\nS5: Distress asset sales\n\nModule 4 - Income Apart from Own-Agricultural Activities and Credit\nS1: Wage employment\nS2: Own business activities\nS3: Transfers\n\nModule 5 - Access to WB\/CIDA\/Italy Food Security Project and Related Programs\nS1: Access to productive safety nets program - public works\nS2: Participation in other food security programs (OFSP)\nS3: Perceptions of benefits of assets created by PSNP and other public works\nS4: Perceptions and participation of operations of the WB\/CIDA\/Italy FSP\nS5: Access to credit\n\nModule 6 - Consumption\nS1: Non-food expenditure on durables and services\nS2: Non-food expenditure on household consumables\nS3: Food consumption\nS4: Food availability, access and coping strategies\n\nModule 7 - Health, Illness, Shocks and Poverty Perceptions\nS1: Health status\nS2: Illness\nS3: Child Growth Promotion\nS4: Long term shocks and coping mechanisms\nS5: Shocks to crops and livestock\nS6: Perceptions of poverty and well-being"}},"data_access":{"dataset_use":{"contact":[{"name":"Microdata Library","affiliation":"The World Bank","email":"","uri":"microdata.worldbank.org"}]}}},"schematype":"survey","tags":[{"tag":"DOI"}]}