Enterprise Survey 2012

Russian Federation, 2011 - 2012

Get Microdata

Reference ID

RUS_2012_ES_v01_M_WB

DOI

https://doi.org/10.48529/qctz-wj62

Producer(s)

World Bank, European Bank for Reconstruction and Development

Collection(s)

Enterprise Surveys

Metadata

DDI/XML JSON

Created on

Dec 05, 2012

Last modified

Sep 26, 2013

Page views

59831

Downloads

14001

Private payments/gifts/other benefits to local/regional officials -direct impact (ECAq44c)

Data file: Russia-2012-full data

Overview

Valid: 4220

Invalid: 0

Type: Discrete

Decimal: 0

Start: 3579

End: 3593

Width: 15

Range: -9 - 5

Format: Numeric

Questions and instructions

Literal question

It is often said that firms make unofficial payments/gifts, private payments or other benefits to public officials to gain advantages in the drafting of laws, decrees, regulations, and other binding government decisions. To what extent have the following practices had a direct impact on this establishment?
Private payments/gifts or other benefits to local or regional government officials to affect their votes or content of government decrees

Categories

Value	Category	Cases
-9	Don't know	370	8.8%
-7	Does not apply	526	12.5%
1	No impact	2444	57.9%
2	Minor impact	298	7.1%
3	Moderate impact	353	8.4%
4	Major impact	189	4.5%
5	Decisive impact	40	0.9%

Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.

Interviewer instructions

Sensitive question, no clarification can be offered

Back to Catalog