Hunger Safety Net Programme Impact Evaluation 2012, Second Follow-up Round
Kenya, 2012
Get Microdata
Reference ID
KEN_2012_HSNP-FU2_v01_M
Producer(s)
Oxford Policy Management Limited
Collection(s)
Metadata
Created on
Jan 15, 2014
Last modified
Jan 15, 2014
Page views
224485
Downloads
18303
- Data files
- 3moves
- 3table
- 5table
- 6education
- 6health
- 6personnel
- 6table
- 7food
- 7food1
- 7other
- 7other1
- comq_linking_FU2
- comq_weights
- coversheet
- section3
- section4
- section5
- section8
- section9
- section10
- section11
- section99
- ClusterMaster
- disaggregation_data
- HHAsset
- HHAssetLivelihood
- HHBeneficiaries
- HHCHild
- HHconsData
- HHCopingStrategy
- HHData
- HHEmploymentProgramme
- HHEnterprise
- HHEnterpriseMember
- HHFoodAid
- HHFoodconsData
- HHImpact
- HHItemPurchaseDistance
- HHLivestock
- HHMember
- HHMover
- HHOpMon
- HHOtherCashTrans
- HHPreambleTracking
- HHProvidedFor
- HHSampleRecord
- HHTransfer
- HHVisit
- hh_weights_original
Who does [NAME] consult with when deciding how to use the payment? (IMPaaQ02)
Data file: HHImpact
Overview
Valid:
1194
Invalid:
1242
Type:
Discrete
Decimal:
0
Start:
19
End:
20
Width:
2
Range:
1 - 98
Format:
Numeric
Questions and instructions
Categories
| Value | Category | Cases | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Alone | 407 |
34.1%
|
| 2 | In consultation with head of household (if the main decision maker is not the head of the household) | 118 |
9.9%
|
| 3 | In consultation with beneficiary (if the main decision maker is not the beneficiary) | 71 |
5.9%
|
| 4 | In consultation with wife/husband | 437 |
36.6%
|
| 5 | In consultation with eldest son | 82 |
6.9%
|
| 6 | In consultation with children (not just eldest son) | 52 |
4.4%
|
| 7 | In consultation with wife/husband and children | 9 |
0.8%
|
| 8 | In consultation with family members and extended family members | 18 |
1.5%
|
| 9 | In consultation with someone else in the community | 0 |
0%
|
| 98 | Don’t know | 0 |
0%
|
| Sysmiss | 1242 |
Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.