IDASA Local Election Study 1995

South Africa, 1995

Get Microdata

Reference ID

ZAF_1995_ILES_v01_M

Producer(s)

IDASA

Collection(s)

DataFirst , University of Cape Town, South Africa

Metadata

Documentation in PDF DDI/XML JSON

Created on

Jan 09, 2013

Last modified

May 01, 2014

Page views

10884

Downloads

690

Identification

Survey ID Number

ZAF_1995_ILES_v01_M

Title

IDASA Local Election Study 1995

Country/Economy

Name	Country code
South Africa	zaf

Study type

Public Opinion Survey [ind/pos]

Abstract

The 1995 Community elections were widely seen to be the closing chapter in South Africa's transition to democracy. These elections would provide citizens with a direct and equal voice in government at the most basic level. They were also seen as the vehicle which would restore to local government the legitimacy necessary to begin the process of reconstruction and development, as well as the authority to bring about law and order in areas where it had broken down. Until these elections, local government in towns and metropolitan areas had been fragmented, based on racially determined, apartheid “group areas”. There were virtually no formal structures of local government in rural areas. Whites (except those in rural areas) elected fully democratic councils to govern themselves. Since 1983, Coloured and Indian citizens were able to vote for local councils with limited powers under the Tricameral parliamentary structures. Africans living in Black townships inside “white” South Africa were legally able to vote for councillors to the “Black Local Authorities”. Local government in the “Black Local Authorities” and the local Tricameral structures in Coloured and Indian communities were constantly challenged. Rent and service boycotts, election stay-aways and physical intimidation of councillors left these governments barren of leaders, bankrupt and illegitimate. For Africans in the “national states” or “self-governing territories”, local government was even in greater disarray, with some urban areas having nominal local councils, and most rural areas being governed by a mixture of traditional leaders, regional services councils or development corporations.

The IDASA survey would provide first systematic evidence on individual attitudes toward the local government system in South Africa. The examination of the legitimacy of local government focused on four key areas: whether people felt local councils were in touch with public opinion; whether they felt able to influence local government; whether they trusted local councils to govern well; and whether they thought local councils were able to address key problems effectively.

Kind of Data

Sample survey data [ssd]

Unit of Analysis

Units of analysis in the survey were individuals and households

Version

Version Description

v1: Edited, anonymised data for licensed distribution

Version Date

1995

Scope

Notes

Basic information was collected on respondents, including age, occupation, highest level of qualification, monthly household income, language, type of living area, population group and gender. The survey focused on issues such as voting intentions, knowledge of voting procedures and party identification. It also examined attitudes towards democracy, evaluations of government performance, views of local councils and economic evaluations.

Topics

Topic	Vocabulary	URI
mass political behaviour, attitudes/opinion [4.6]	CESSDA	Link

Coverage

Geographic Coverage

The survey had national coverage

Geographic Unit

The lowest level of geographic aggregation covered by the data is magisterial district

Universe

The survey covered all adult South Africans who were eligible to vote in the 1995 Local Election

Producers and sponsors

Primary investigators

Name
IDASA

Funding Agency/Sponsor

Name	Abbreviation	Role
United States Agency for International Development	USAID	Funder

Sampling

Sampling Procedure

The sample was drawn using a multi-stage, clustered random probability sample disproportionately stratified by province, population group and community size (metro, city, large town, small town, village and rural).

Weighting

Due to disproportionate sample, it was necessary to weight the data up to the universe, i.e. the South African voting public. The sample was weighted according to province, age, gender, type of area, language, income and education and projected onto the universe. The results were then weighted to reflect an electorate estimated at 24.3 million voters. A weight variable has been included in the dataset.

Data Collection

Dates of Data Collection

Start	End
1995-09	1995-11

Data Collection Mode

Face-to-face [f2f]

Data Collectors

Name
Market and Opinion Surveys (Pty) Ltd

Access policy

Contacts

Name	Affiliation	Email	URL
DataFirst Helpdesk	University of Cape Town	support@data1st.org	Link

Access conditions

Public use files, accessible to all

Citation requirements

Public Opinion Service (IDASA). IDASA Local Election Study 1995 [dataset]. Version 1. Cape Town: Public Opinion Service (IDASA) [producer], 1995. Cape Town: DataFirst [distributor], 2012.

Access authority

Name	Affiliation	Email	URL
DataFirst	University of Cape Town	info@data1st.org	Link

Disclaimer and copyrights

Disclaimer

The user of the data acknowledges that the original collector of the data, the authorized distributor of the data, and the relevant funding agency bear no responsibility for use of the data or for interpretations or inferences based upon such uses.

Metadata production

DDI Document ID

DDI_ZAF_1995_ILES_v01_M

Producers

Name	Affiliation	Role
DataFirst	University of Cape Town	Metadata Producer

Date of Metadata Production

2012-02-06

DDI Document version

Version 1

Back to Catalog