World Health Survey 2003
Kenya, 2003
Get Microdata
Reference ID
KEN_2003_WHS_v01_M
Producer(s)
World Health Organization (WHO)
Collection(s)
Created on
Oct 17, 2013
Last modified
Oct 17, 2013
Page views
59517
Downloads
21
unusual circumstances (q9013)
Data file: WHS-Kenya_F5
Overview
Valid:
3094
Invalid:
0
Type:
Discrete
Start:
3225
End:
3304
Width:
80
Range:
-
Format:
character
Questions and instructions
Literal question
Any unusual circumstances or happenings during the interview:
Categories
| Value | Category | Cases | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 |
0%
|
|
| 2 | 2 |
0.1%
|
|
| 3 | 3 |
0.1%
|
|
| 4 | 1 |
0%
|
|
| 5 | 1 |
0%
|
|
| A BIT OF INTERRUPTIONS FROM THE BABY THE RESPONDENT QUITE COOPERATIVE | 1 |
0%
|
|
| A FEW INTERRUPTIONS | 1 |
0%
|
|
| A GRANDCHILD PASSED AND THE FAMILY WAS SAD. | 1 |
0%
|
|
| A LOT OF DISTURBANCES FROM NEIGHBOURS KEEN TO KNOW WHAT'S HAPPENING THE GIRL IS | 1 |
0%
|
|
| A LOT OF INTERFEARANCES AS SHE WAS LOOKING AFTER CATTLE | 1 |
0%
|
|
| A LOT OF INTERRUPTIONS DURING INTERVIEW | 1 |
0%
|
|
| A LOT OF MEMORY LAPSE | 1 |
0%
|
|
| A NICE INTERVIEW WITHOUT ANY INTERRUPTION AT ALL. | 1 |
0%
|
|
| A VERY COMPETITIVE RESPONDENT | 1 |
0%
|
|
| A VERY GOOD INTERVIEW | 1 |
0%
|
|
| A VERY GOOD INTERVIEW ENDED WELL | 1 |
0%
|
|
| A VERY GOOD INTERVIEW WHICH ACTUALLY STARTED WELL AND ENDED WELL. | 1 |
0%
|
|
| A VERY GOOD INTERVIEW WHICH STARTED WELL AND ENDED WELL | 1 |
0%
|
|
| A VISITOR INTERRUPTED THE INTERVIEW | 1 |
0%
|
|
| AFTER HOUSEHOLD QUESTIONARE, VISITORS CAME, STOPPED FOR ALMOST 2 HOURS | 1 |
0%
|
|
| AGE CAUSED MEMORY LAPSE | 1 |
0%
|
|
| AGES AT DEATH OF THE DEAD SIBLINGS AND THE CAUSES OF DEATH IS NOT KNOWN TO THE R | 1 |
0%
|
|
| ALLOWED TO REST,GAVE BIRTH RECENTLY | 1 |
0%
|
|
| ALOT OF INTERFERENCES BY OTHERS | 1 |
0%
|
|
| ALOT OF INTERUPTION BY RELATIVES | 1 |
0%
|
|
| ALOT OF INTERUPTION FROM NEIGHBOURS | 1 |
0%
|
|
| ALOT OF INTERUPTION FROM THE BABY | 1 |
0%
|
|
| AN INTERPRATER WAS USED | 1 |
0%
|
|
| AN OLD OF 72 YEARS AND VERY AND FIT | 1 |
0%
|
|
| ASK MANY GOOD QUESTIONS | 1 |
0%
|
|
| ASSISTED BY DAUGHTER IN LAW | 1 |
0%
|
|
| ATTENDING CHILD CHORES | 1 |
0%
|
|
| ATTENDING TO HOUSEHOLD CHORES WHILE BEING INTERVIEED | 1 |
0%
|
|
| AVERY EDUCATED RESPONDENT AND HENCE THE INTERVIEW ENDED NICELY AND IN GOOD TIME. | 1 |
0%
|
|
| An intepreter was used | 1 |
0%
|
|
| BAD ATITITUDE | 1 |
0%
|
|
| BLANK PAGES IN THE QUESTIONNAIRE | 1 |
0%
|
|
| BREAK FOR SOMETIME | 1 |
0%
|
|
| BUSY RESPONDENT | 1 |
0%
|
|
| CHILD CRIED OFTENLY | 1 |
0%
|
|
| CHILD CRYING | 1 |
0%
|
|
| CHILD SUDDENLY FELL SICK AND RUSHED TO THE HOSPITAL | 1 |
0%
|
|
| CHILD WITH FEVER-OCCASSINAL CRYING | 1 |
0%
|
|
| CHILDREN INTERRUPTION | 1 |
0%
|
|
| CO-OPERATIVE | 1 |
0%
|
|
| COMFORTABLE WITH SENSITIVE QUESTIONNAIRE | 1 |
0%
|
|
| COMMUNITY CAME AROUND | 1 |
0%
|
|
| COMPLAIN ABOUT THE QUESTIONNAIRE BEING TOO LONG. | 1 |
0%
|
|
| COMPLAINED OF HER HEALTH DURING INTERVIEW | 1 |
0%
|
|
| COMPLETED | 1 |
0%
|
|
| COMPLETED INTERVIEW THE 2ND DAY | 1 |
0%
|
|
| CONSUMED MORE TIME | 1 |
0%
|
|
| COOKING, WHILE INTERVIEW WAS GOING ON | 1 |
0%
|
|
| COOPERATED HASTELY | 1 |
0%
|
|
| COOPERATION | 1 |
0%
|
|
| COOPERATIVE | 1 |
0%
|
|
| COOPERATIVE LADY | 1 |
0%
|
|
| COUGHING TREMEDIUSLY | 1 |
0%
|
|
| COULD COUGH AFTER 20 MINUTES OR SO. | 1 |
0%
|
|
| COULD NOT RESPOND WELL | 1 |
0%
|
|
| COULD STRETCH OUT HANDS AND SIGH CONTINOUSLY | 1 |
0%
|
|
| COZ HE WAS DRUNK,RESPONDENT CAUSED INTERFERENCES | 1 |
0%
|
|
| CRIES FROM THE YOUNG KID | 1 |
0%
|
|
| CUSTOMER CAME TO BUY VEGETABLES | 1 |
0%
|
|
| Cannot tell ages | 1 |
0%
|
|
| DEMANDED PAYMENT | 1 |
0%
|
|
| DIFRENCES AROSE REQUIRING TEMPORARY DISCONTINUATION | 1 |
0%
|
|
| DISRRUPTIONS FROM HIS DISABLED DAUGHTER | 1 |
0%
|
|
| DISRUPTIONS TO ATTEND TO OTHER BUSINESSES | 1 |
0%
|
|
| DISTUNANCE BY CHILD CRY | 1 |
0%
|
|
| DISTURBANCE BY CHILDREN | 2 |
0.1%
|
|
| DISTURBANCE BY RESPONDENTS SON | 1 |
0%
|
|
| DISTURBANCE FROM VISITORS | 1 |
0%
|
|
| DISTURBANCES | 1 |
0%
|
|
| DISTURBANCES FROM VISITORS | 1 |
0%
|
|
| DISTURBANCES BY CHILDREN | 1 |
0%
|
|
| DISTURBED BY CUSTOMERS IN THE SHOP | 1 |
0%
|
|
| DISTURBUNCE BY A DRUNKARD | 1 |
0%
|
|
| DO NOT VALUE HOSPITAL HENCE THE FAMILY | 1 |
0%
|
|
| DRUNK AND IMPATIENT | 1 |
0%
|
|
| DRUNKARD | 1 |
0%
|
|
| DUE TO LANGUAGE DIFFERENCES WE HAD TO USE AN INTERPRETOR | 1 |
0%
|
|
| FEW INTERUPTIONS | 1 |
0%
|
|
| FINE | 4 |
0.1%
|
|
| FINE INTERVIEW | 1 |
0%
|
|
| FORCED TO USE AN INTERPRETER | 1 |
0%
|
|
| FREQUENT INTERRUPTION BY CHILDREN. | 1 |
0%
|
|
| FREQUENTLY ATTENDING TO DOMESTIC CHORES | 1 |
0%
|
|
| Followed the respondent to her place of work | 1 |
0%
|
|
| GOOD AT EVERY QUESTION | 1 |
0%
|
|
| HAD TO REFER CERTAIN THINGS TO SPOUSE | 1 |
0%
|
|
| HAD TO REFER TO OTHER PERSONS FOR CLARITY | 1 |
0%
|
|
| HAD TO SIT VERY CLOSE TO HER EAR | 1 |
0%
|
|
| HAD TO STOP THE INTERVIEW TILL EVENING FOR THE 'R' WAS TO GO BACK TO WORK | 1 |
0%
|
|
| HAS ALOT OF ASSISTANCE (FINANCIAL) EXPECTATIONS | 1 |
0%
|
|
| HAS BIRTH RECORDS AND COULD REFERS. | 1 |
0%
|
|
| HAS STRONG NEGATIVE ATTITUDES TOWARDS THE GOVERMENT | 1 |
0%
|
|
| HE DOESNT HAVE A LOT OF INFORMATION ON HIS STEP BROTHERS AND SISTERS | 1 |
0%
|
|
| HEARING PROBLEM | 1 |
0%
|
|
| HEARING PROBLEM DELAYED THE INTERVIEW | 1 |
0%
|
|
| HEARINH PROBLEM | 1 |
0%
|
|
| HER DAUGHTER WHO IS MENTALLY ILL WAS A BOTHER | 1 |
0%
|
|
| HER UNDERSTANDING WAS VERY LOW | 1 |
0%
|
|
| HIS TURNBOY FRIENDS CAME AND DISTURBED ME ALOT | 1 |
0%
|
|
| HSEHOLD MEMBER QUESTIONED THE RATIONALE BEHIND SURVEYS THAT NEVER RESULT TO ANY | 1 |
0%
|
|
| HUSBAND CAME SHORTLY AND WENT AWAY | 1 |
0%
|
|
| HUSBAND AND OTHER PEOPLE CAME IN DURING THE INTERVIEW. | 1 |
0%
|
|
| HUSBAND OF THE RESPONDENT WAS DRUNK SO HE KEPT ON INTERRUPTING | 1 |
0%
|
|
| HUSBAND WAS CURIOUS WHEN ASKED TO REMAIN ALONE WITH WIFE | 1 |
0%
|
|
| I WAS ASKED TO EXPLIAN WHY JUST THE OTHER DAY A SAME SURVEY WAS CONDUCTED AND NO | 1 |
0%
|
|
| I WAS ASSISTED BY SOMEBODY TO MAKE POINTS CLEAR TO HER | 1 |
0%
|
|
| I WAS STRONGLY QUESTIONED SINCE THEY DONT BELIEVE IN STRANGERS IN THE H/HOLDS DU | 1 |
0%
|
|
| IN THE INITIAL STAGES OF THE INTERVIEW, THE HUSBAND INSISTED ON FOLLOWING THE IN | 1 |
0%
|
|
| INTERESTING | 1 |
0%
|
|
| INTERFERENCE | 1 |
0%
|
|
| INTERFERENCE BY OTHERS | 1 |
0%
|
|
| INTERFERENCE FROM HOSTILE FAMILY MEMBER - (CO-WIFE) | 1 |
0%
|
|
| INTERFERENCE FROM LOCAI PPLE DEMANDING ALCOL | 1 |
0%
|
|
| INTERFERENCE IN THE PROCESS | 1 |
0%
|
|
| INTERFERENCES IN BETWEEN THE PROCESS | 1 |
0%
|
|
| INTERRUPTED | 2 |
0.1%
|
|
| INTERRUPTED BY CONFLICTS FROM NEIGHBOURS | 1 |
0%
|
|
| INTERRUPTED BY VISITORS | 1 |
0%
|
|
| INTERRUPTION | 2 |
0.1%
|
|
| INTERRUPTION BY CHILDREN | 3 |
0.1%
|
|
| INTERRUPTION BY CHILDREN CRYING AND FEEDING CHILD | 1 |
0%
|
|
| INTERRUPTION BY DRUNKERS | 1 |
0%
|
|
| INTERRUPTION BY HER CHILDREN. | 2 |
0.1%
|
|
| INTERRUPTION BY VISITORS | 1 |
0%
|
|
| INTERRUPTION BY VISTORS | 1 |
0%
|
|
| INTERRUPTION IN BETWEEN THE INTERVIEW PROCESS. | 1 |
0%
|
|
| INTERRUPTION MOST OF THE TIME BY FAMILY MEMBERS | 1 |
0%
|
|
| INTERRUPTIONS | 10 |
0.3%
|
|
| INTERRUPTIONS FROM CLIENTS | 1 |
0%
|
|
| INTERRUPTIONS BY FRIENDS RESPONDENT WAS VERY NEGATIVE AOUT THE SURVERY | 1 |
0%
|
|
| INTERRUPTIONS BY RELATIVES. | 1 |
0%
|
|
| INTERRUPTIONS BY SOME OUTSIDERS | 1 |
0%
|
|
| INTERRUPTIONS BY VISITORS | 2 |
0.1%
|
|
| INTERRUPTIONS DURING INTERVIEW | 2 |
0.1%
|
|
| INTERRUPTIONS FROM CUSTOMERS | 2 |
0.1%
|
|
| INTERRUPTIONS FROM FRIENDS | 2 |
0.1%
|
|
| INTERRUPTIONS OF EXCITED MEMBERS | 1 |
0%
|
|
| INTERRUPTIONS PERIODICALLY ON THE SECOND DAY | 1 |
0%
|
|
| INTERRUPTIONS WITH HOUSEHOLD CHORES | 1 |
0%
|
|
| INTERUPTION | 2 |
0.1%
|
|
| INTERUPTION BY CALLS | 1 |
0%
|
|
| INTERUPTION BY CHILDREN FROM SCHOOL | 1 |
0%
|
|
| INTERUPTION BY CUSTOMER | 1 |
0%
|
|
| INTERUPTION BY CUSTOMERS IN THE SHOP | 1 |
0%
|
|
| INTERUPTION BY DRUNKEN COLLEGUES | 1 |
0%
|
|
| INTERUPTION BY RELATIVE | 1 |
0%
|
|
| INTERUPTION BY THE MOTHER | 1 |
0%
|
|
| INTERUPTION BY VISITORS | 1 |
0%
|
|
| INTERUPTION FROM RELATIVES | 1 |
0%
|
|
| INTERUPTIONS | 5 |
0.2%
|
|
| INTERUPTIONS BY FRIENDS | 1 |
0%
|
|
| INTERUPTIONS BY MEMBERS OF THE HOUSEHOLD | 1 |
0%
|
|
| INTERUPTIONS BY VISITORS | 1 |
0%
|
|
| INTERUPTIONS FROM HER DRUNKEN SONS | 1 |
0%
|
|
| INTERVIEW POSTPONED FOR UNAVOIDABLE REASONS | 1 |
0%
|
|
| INTERVIEW CARRIED BEHIND THE GATE | 1 |
0%
|
|
| INTERVIEW WENT ON WELL | 1 |
0%
|
|
| INTERVIEW CONDUCTED IN A SHAMBA IN UNCOMFORTABLE CONDITION | 1 |
0%
|
|
| INTERVIEW CONDUCTED IN A VERY BUSY SHOP SO ALOT OF TIME HAD TO BE TAKEN PRIVACY | 1 |
0%
|
|
| INTERVIEW ENDED NICELY | 2 |
0.1%
|
|
| INTERVIEW ENDED NICELY. | 1 |
0%
|
|
| INTERVIEW INTERUPTED BY VISITORS | 1 |
0%
|
|
| INTERVIEW MOVED ON WELL. | 1 |
0%
|
|
| INTERVIEW WAS A NICE ONE | 1 |
0%
|
|
| INTERVIEW WENT ON NICELY | 1 |
0%
|
|
| INTERVIEW WENT ON WELL | 1 |
0%
|
|
| INTERVIEWED IN THE CAR FOR PRIVACY PURPOSES | 1 |
0%
|
|
| INTERVIEWED IN THE GARDEN WHILE DIGGING | 1 |
0%
|
|
| INTRUPTION | 1 |
0%
|
|
| IT STARTED TO BECOME DARK | 1 |
0%
|
|
| IT WAS DONE IN HOSPITAL | 1 |
0%
|
|
| Interruption by husband | 1 |
0%
|
|
| Interruptions by children | 1 |
0%
|
|
| Interruptions by hostile employer | 1 |
0%
|
|
| Interuption during interview | 1 |
0%
|
|
| Interview ended nicely | 1 |
0%
|
|
| Interview went on nicely | 1 |
0%
|
|
| It took alot of pleading to get information regarding the household from the res | 1 |
0%
|
|
| LANGUAGE BARRIER(TRANSLATION WAS DONE) | 1 |
0%
|
|
| LOT OF INTERRUPTION FROM CUSTOMERS WHO NEEDED TO BE SERVED | 1 |
0%
|
|
| MANY VISITORS THUS ALOT OF INTERRUPTIONS. | 1 |
0%
|
|
| MINIMUM INTERFERENCE | 1 |
0%
|
|
| MINIMUM INTERFERENCE IN THE PROCESS | 1 |
0%
|
|
| MINIMUM INTERRUPTIONS | 1 |
0%
|
|
| MINOR INTERRUPTIONS DURING THE INTERVIEW | 1 |
0%
|
|
| MINOR INTERRUPTIONS | 1 |
0%
|
|
| MINOR INTERRUPTIONS BY CHILDREN | 3 |
0.1%
|
|
| MINOR INTERRUPTIONS BY CHLDREN | 1 |
0%
|
|
| MINOR INTERRUPTIONS BY CUSTOMERS | 1 |
0%
|
|
| MINOR INTERRUPTIONS BY FRIENDS | 1 |
0%
|
|
| MINOR INTERRUPTIONS BY NEIGHBOURS | 1 |
0%
|
|
| MINOR INTERRUPTIONS BY PASSERSBY | 1 |
0%
|
|
| MINOR INTERUPTIONS | 1 |
0%
|
|
| MOTHER AND CHILD HAVE GOITRE | 1 |
0%
|
|
| MOVEMENT UP AND DOWN DURING THE INTERVIEW | 1 |
0%
|
|
| Many visitors coming in | 1 |
0%
|
|
| N/A | 7 |
0.2%
|
|
| NEED OF BREAK IN BETWEEN INTERVIEW | 1 |
0%
|
|
| NEIGHBOUR INTERRUPTED AND DELAYED INTERVIEW | 1 |
0%
|
|
| NEIGHBOURS WALKING IN AND OUT | 1 |
0%
|
|
| NIL | 11 |
0.4%
|
|
| NO | 173 |
5.6%
|
|
| NO AMOUNT OF INTERFERANCE | 1 |
0%
|
|
| NO AMOUNT OF INTERFERENCE | 1 |
0%
|
|
| NO COMMENT | 4 |
0.1%
|
|
| NO COMMENTS | 4 |
0.1%
|
|
| NO DISTURBANCES | 1 |
0%
|
|
| NO INTERFERANCE | 1 |
0%
|
|
| NO INTERFERENCE | 4 |
0.1%
|
|
| NO INTERFERNCE | 1 |
0%
|
|
| NO INTERRUPTIONS | 3 |
0.1%
|
|
| NO INTERUPTIONS | 1 |
0%
|
|
| NO MEMBER OF THE HOUSHOLD HAS SOUGHT FOR HEALTH CARE | 1 |
0%
|
|
| NO PROBLEM | 32 |
1%
|
|
| NO PROBLEM DURING THE INTERVIEW. | 1 |
0%
|
|
| NO PROBLEM. | 1 |
0%
|
|
| NO UNUSUAL CERCUMSTANCES | 1 |
0%
|
|
| NO UNUSUAL HAPPENINGS | 1 |
0%
|
|
| NO. | 1 |
0%
|
|
| NON | 1 |
0%
|
|
| NONE | 2060 |
66.6%
|
|
| NONE BUT TRIED TO AVOID THE INTERVIEW AT THE BEGINING | 1 |
0%
|
|
| NONE. | 1 |
0%
|
|
| NOT CO-OPERATIVE AT FIRST. | 1 |
0%
|
|
| NOT CONCENTRATING | 1 |
0%
|
|
| NOT COOPERATIVE | 1 |
0%
|
|
| NOT VERY WILLING TO RESPOND | 1 |
0%
|
|
| NOTHING | 26 |
0.8%
|
|
| NOTHING UNUSUAL HAPPENED | 2 |
0.1%
|
|
| NOTHING UNUSUAL. | 1 |
0%
|
|
| No | 192 |
6.2%
|
|
| None | 60 |
1.9%
|
|
| O.K | 1 |
0%
|
|
| OK | 6 |
0.2%
|
|
| OLD AGE AND ABIT OF MENTAL INSTABILITY | 1 |
0%
|
|
| OLD AND KNOWLEDGEABLE | 1 |
0%
|
|
| OLD RESPONDENT FORCING YOU TO INVOLVE OTHERS ON INDIVIDUAL QUESTIONNAIRE. | 1 |
0%
|
|
| OVER STAYING | 1 |
0%
|
|
| PEACEFUL CONDUCTED INTERVIEW | 1 |
0%
|
|
| PLANNING TO GO FOR WORK(BUSINESS) | 1 |
0%
|
|
| POLYGAMAS | 1 |
0%
|
|
| POOR MEMORY | 1 |
0%
|
|
| PREPARING FOOD FOR HER CHILD | 1 |
0%
|
|
| PREPARING TO GO FOR HER BUSINESS | 1 |
0%
|
|
| PREPARING SUPPER DURING INTERVIEW | 1 |
0%
|
|
| Paused for 30 min because she had to take the cows to the river | 1 |
0%
|
|
| QN TOO LONG | 1 |
0%
|
|
| REFUSAL TO TELL ABOUT BROTHERS AND SISTERS | 1 |
0%
|
|
| RELATIVE DISSAPPROVAL OF THE INTERVIEW | 1 |
0%
|
|
| RESPODENT STRESSED ISSUE OF NEGATIVE ATITUDE BY NURSES ESPECIALLY LABOUR WARD AN | 1 |
0%
|
|
| RESPONDENT NOT WILLING TO ANSWER ALL QUESTIONS | 1 |
0%
|
|
| RESPONDENT WAS OFTEN INTERRUPTED BY CUSTOMERS | 1 |
0%
|
|
| RESPONDENT AGED ,BAD HEALTH AND LIVING ALONE | 1 |
0%
|
|
| RESPONDENT BECAME NERVOUS ABOUT "INCOME INDICATORS" AND THE INTERVIEW STOPPED TI | 1 |
0%
|
|
| RESPONDENT COULD BARELY REMEMBER OLD EVENTS | 1 |
0%
|
|
| RESPONDENT COULD NOT RESPOND TO SOME QUESTIONS NEED TO CALL THE MOTHER | 1 |
0%
|
|
| RESPONDENT HAD TO ATTEND TO FAMILY ISSUES DURING THE INTERVIEW (5-10 MIN INTERVA | 1 |
0%
|
|
| RESPONDENT HAS A COMPLETLY DEFORMED CHILD AND MENTALLY RETARDED | 1 |
0%
|
|
| RESPONDENT HAS ARTHRITIS AND MENTAL DISEASE, SHE IS ON DRUGS. LEVEL OF MOERBIDIT | 1 |
0%
|
|
| RESPONDENT HAS LOW VOICE - NECK OPERATION | 1 |
0%
|
|
| RESPONDENT HAVING BREAK FOR LUNCH | 1 |
0%
|
|
| RESPONDENT INTERVIEWED IN SCHOOL | 2 |
0.1%
|
|
| RESPONDENT IS A PRITON - NOT STAYED LONG IN KENYA | 1 |
0%
|
|
| RESPONDENT IS NOT READY TO DISCUSS OR GIVE NAMES OF SIBLINGS | 1 |
0%
|
|
| RESPONDENT KEPT DOZING OFF | 1 |
0%
|
|
| RESPONDENT LOST HUSBAND | 1 |
0%
|
|
| RESPONDENT NEEDED ALOT OF PROBING | 1 |
0%
|
|
| RESPONDENT PREFFERED TO BE ASSISTED BY THE WIFE IN ANSWERING. | 1 |
0%
|
|
| RESPONDENT RECOVERING FROM INJURIES IN A ROAD ACCIDENT | 1 |
0%
|
|
| RESPONDENT REFUSED TO ANSWER MOST OF THE QUESTIONS | 1 |
0%
|
|
| RESPONDENT REFUSED TO ANSWER QUESTIONS ON VIGNETTES 7000 AND 8000 SECTIONS | 1 |
0%
|
|
| RESPONDENT STOPPED INTERVIEW FOR 2 HOURS | 1 |
0%
|
|
| RESPONDENT TOOK 30 MINUTES TEA BREAK | 1 |
0%
|
|
| RESPONDENT UNDER ALCOHOL INTOXICATION | 1 |
0%
|
|
| RESPONDENT UNDERSTANDING WAS VERY LOW | 1 |
0%
|
|
| RESPONDENT VERY BUSY SHAVING CUSTOMERS, HAD TO WAIT TO GET CHANCE WHEN HE IS THR | 1 |
0%
|
|
| RESPONDENT WAS ABIT PARANOID AND CONFUSED | 1 |
0%
|
|
| RESPONDENT WAS ALITTLE DRUNK | 1 |
0%
|
|
| RESPONDENT WAS ATTENDING TO CUSTOMERS AT THE SHOP DURING THE INTERVIEW | 1 |
0%
|
|
| RESPONDENT WAS AWAY AND HAD TO WAIT. | 1 |
0%
|
|
| RESPONDENT WAS BUSY BUT COMPLETED NEXT DAY | 1 |
0%
|
|
| RESPONDENT WAS DIZZINESS | 1 |
0%
|
|
| RESPONDENT WAS DOZING OFF DURING THE INTERVIEW | 1 |
0%
|
|
| RESPONDENT WAS DRUNK DURING THE INTERVIEW | 1 |
0%
|
|
| RESPONDENT WAS SLOW IN ANSWERING | 1 |
0%
|
|
| RESPONDENT WAS VERY SUPERTICIOUS ABOUT DISEASES AND MEDICINE | 1 |
0%
|
|
| RESTLESS RESPONDENT AT FINAL STAGES OF INTERVIEW | 1 |
0%
|
|
| Respondent could not remember most events e.g the birth dates of her siblings | 1 |
0%
|
|
| Respondent kept on forgetting certain items | 1 |
0%
|
|
| Respondent stammers | 1 |
0%
|
|
| Respondent was unable to recall births by mother | 1 |
0%
|
|
| Respondent went away briefly and so had to make a call back at about 15:45 | 1 |
0%
|
|
| SEEMS DRUNK | 1 |
0%
|
|
| SELLING MEAT AS WE TALK | 1 |
0%
|
|
| SEVERAL INTERRUPTIONS BY HUSBAND | 1 |
0%
|
|
| SHE HAD A MENTALLY DISTURBED CHILD SO ALOT OF INTERUPTIONS | 1 |
0%
|
|
| SHE IS ILLITERATE SO SHE HAD ALOT OF PROBLEMS UNDERSTANDING. | 1 |
0%
|
|
| SHE REJECTED CALL BACK, VILLAGE ELDER INTERVENED | 1 |
0%
|
|
| SHE WAS BUSY CULTIVATING WHILE BEING INTERVIEWED | 1 |
0%
|
|
| SIBLING INFORMATION GIVEN BY PERENTS | 1 |
0%
|
|
| SICKNESS | 1 |
0%
|
|
| SLIGHT INTERRUPTION | 1 |
0%
|
|
| SLIGHT INTERRUPTION BY YOUNG CHILD (INFANT) | 1 |
0%
|
|
| SLIGHTLY DRUNK | 1 |
0%
|
|
| SLOW | 1 |
0%
|
|
| SLOW IN ANSWERING QUESTIONS | 1 |
0%
|
|
| SLOW IN RESPONDING | 1 |
0%
|
|
| SMALL INTERUPTION BY VISITORS | 1 |
0%
|
|
| SO MUCH INTERRUPTIONS, CROWDING, QUESTION. USED AN INTERPRETOR; COULD NOT UNDERS | 1 |
0%
|
|
| SOME DISTURBANCE BY KIDS | 1 |
0%
|
|
| SOME INTERRUPTION DURING INTERVIEW. | 1 |
0%
|
|
| SOME INTERRUPTIONS BY DRUNK NEIGHBOURS | 1 |
0%
|
|
| SOME INTERRUPTIONS DUE TO ATTENDING OTHER RESPONSIBILITIES | 1 |
0%
|
|
| SOME SLIGHT INTERUPTIONS | 1 |
0%
|
|
| SOMEHOW COOPERATIVE | 1 |
0%
|
|
| STUBBORN | 1 |
0%
|
|
| SUCCESFUL/NONE | 1 |
0%
|
|
| SUSPICIOUS BREW | 1 |
0%
|
|
| Several people were interupting to know what is going on | 1 |
0%
|
|
| She wanted to go sell her wares | 1 |
0%
|
|
| She was coughing and sneezing continously | 1 |
0%
|
|
| Sick Child crying | 1 |
0%
|
|
| Some members of the community present during the interview | 1 |
0%
|
|
| TALKATIVE RESPONDENT | 1 |
0%
|
|
| TALKS MUCH POLYGAMOUS | 1 |
0%
|
|
| TEA BREAK FOR 20 MINUTES | 1 |
0%
|
|
| THE RESPONDENT WAS TO ATTEND OTHER BUSINESS | 1 |
0%
|
|
| THE RESPONDENT WAS PERSUADED BUT REFUSED | 1 |
0%
|
|
| THE RESPONDENT TIRED COZ SHE DELIVERED SAME DAY | 1 |
0%
|
|
| THE HUSBAND IS A CHANGAA BREWER WO HAD TO BE CONVINCED WHILE THE INTERVIEW WAS O | 1 |
0%
|
|
| THE INTERVIEW ENDED NICELY | 13 |
0.4%
|
|
| THE INTERVIEW ENDED VERY NICELY. | 1 |
0%
|
|
| THE INTERVIEW MOVED ON NICELY | 1 |
0%
|
|
| THE INTERVIEW STARTED VERY WELL AND ENDED VERY WELL | 1 |
0%
|
|
| THE INTERVIEW STARTED WEKK AND ENDED WELL , WELL INFORMED RESPONDENT | 1 |
0%
|
|
| THE INTERVIEW STARTED WELL & ENDED WELL | 4 |
0.1%
|
|
| THE INTERVIEW STARTED WELL AND ENDED WELL | 3 |
0.1%
|
|
| THE INTERVIEW WAS DONE ON OFF DUE TO A SICK CHILD | 1 |
0%
|
|
| THE INTERVIEW WAS INTERUPTED SEVERALY BY THE LAST CHILD WHO KEPT ON CRYING AND S | 1 |
0%
|
|
| THE INTERVIEW WAS OKEY EXCEPT THE RESPONDENT WAS SLOW ABIT. | 1 |
0%
|
|
| THE INTERVIEW WAS PARTIALY DONE BECAUSE THE RESPONDENT WAS IN RUSH AND COULD NOT | 1 |
0%
|
|
| THE INTERVIEW WENT ON NICELY | 11 |
0.4%
|
|
| THE INTERVIEW WENT ON SMOOTHLY | 1 |
0%
|
|
| THE INTERVIEW WENT ON SMOOTHLY WITHOUT ANY PROBLEM | 1 |
0%
|
|
| THE LIGHT WAS INSUFFICIENT SO READING WAS DIFFICULT CANDLES USED PROVIDED LITTLE | 1 |
0%
|
|
| THE MAN WAS TAKING A GLASS OF TRADITIONAL BEER | 1 |
0%
|
|
| THE MZEE WAS SENILE SO IT WAS VERY DIFFICULT. THE MAM OF THE MZEE HELPED IN SOME | 1 |
0%
|
|
| THE REPONDENT WANTED TO KNOW ABOUT AIDS(TESTING), AND SAID HE WENT TO VCT CENTRE | 1 |
0%
|
|
| THE RESPONDENT IS AGEING COULD NOT RESPOND. | 1 |
0%
|
|
| THE RESPONDENT WAS SICK AND IN PAIN | 1 |
0%
|
|
| THE RESPONDENT COULDN'T UNDERSTAND WELL. | 1 |
0%
|
|
| THE RESPONDENT DID NOT KNOW THE AGES OF THE BROTHER AND SISTERS EVEN THE MOTHER | 1 |
0%
|
|
| THE RESPONDENT HAD JUST BEEN DISCHARGED FROM HOSPITAL HENCE WAS STILL WEAK AND T | 1 |
0%
|
|
| THE RESPONDENT HAD PROBLEMS WITH UNDERSTANDING BOTH ENGLISH AND KISWAHILI | 1 |
0%
|
|
| THE RESPONDENT HAD SEVERE PROBLEMS UNDERSTANDING THE VIGNETTES HENCE RATING WAS | 1 |
0%
|
|
| THE RESPONDENT HAD SOME UPS AND DOENS HENCE CUT DOWNS FOR INTERVIEW | 1 |
0%
|
|
| THE RESPONDENT HAD TO GO AND WATER THE CATTLE IN BETWEEN THE INTERVIEW | 1 |
0%
|
|
| THE RESPONDENT IS A RELIGIOUS FANATIC AND HAD PROBLEMS WITH | 1 |
0%
|
|
| THE RESPONDENT IS A SHOP KEEPER | 1 |
0%
|
|
| THE RESPONDENT IS IN WHEEL CHAIR AND LIMBS NOT COORDINATING PROPERLY | 1 |
0%
|
|
| THE RESPONDENT IS NOT FREE ON CASES OF SEXUAL ACTIVITIES | 1 |
0%
|
|
| THE RESPONDENT JUST DOES NOT UNDERSTAND AT ALL | 1 |
0%
|
|
| THE RESPONDENT LEFT AT THE MIDDLE OF THE INTERVIEW | 1 |
0%
|
|
| THE RESPONDENT REFUSED TO BE WEIGHED AT FIRST | 1 |
0%
|
|
| THE RESPONDENT REFUSED TO CONTINUE WITH THE INTERVIEW FROM SERIES 6000 DESPITE M | 1 |
0%
|
|
| THE RESPONDENT WAS A BUSY SHOPKEEPER HENCE THE INTERVIEW SESSION WAS CONTINUALLY | 1 |
0%
|
|
| THE RESPONDENT WAS DRUNK | 1 |
0%
|
|
| THE RESPONDENT WAS DRUNK AND BUZY SERVICING HER CUSTOMERS | 1 |
0%
|
|
| THE RESPONDENT WAS IN A TOBACCO CURING KILN WHICH WAS RISKY | 1 |
0%
|
|
| THE RESPONDENT WAS IN HURRY | 1 |
0%
|
|
| THE RESPONDENT WAS INTERRUPTED FREQUENTLY | 1 |
0%
|
|
| THE RESPONDENT WAS NOT WILLING TO ANSWER ALL QUESTIONS AND WAS VERY IMOPATIENT H | 1 |
0%
|
|
| THE RESPONDENT WAS QUITE TENSE | 1 |
0%
|
|
| THE RESPONDENT WAS SUSPICIOUS AND HAD REFUSED TO TAKE THE INTERVIEW BUT LATER CH | 1 |
0%
|
|
| THE RESPONDENT WAS VERY COOPERATIVE IN THE INTERVIEW EVEN IF HE LOST HIS WIFE JU | 1 |
0%
|
|
| THE RESPONDENT WEPT DURING THE INTERVIEW IN REMEMBERENCE OF HER LATE SON | 1 |
0%
|
|
| THE RESPONDENT WHO IS A UNIVERSITY GRADUATE A TEACHER BY PROFFESION HAD TO BE CO | 1 |
0%
|
|
| THE SELECTED R FAITH WAS NOT AVAILABLE DURING THE INTERVIEW. | 1 |
0%
|
|
| THE TIMING ON THE QUESTIONARE WAS NOT ACCURATE. MY WATCH DEVELOPED A PROBLEM. | 1 |
0%
|
|
| THEIR SUPPER WAS DELAYED DUE TO THE INTERVIEW | 1 |
0%
|
|
| THERE WAS A BREAK BEFORE THE INTERVIEW CONTINUE | 1 |
0%
|
|
| THERE WAS A BREAK FROM EARLY | 1 |
0%
|
|
| THERE WAS A TIME WHEN THE INTERVIEW WAS INTERRUPTED BY SOMEONE WHO WANTED TO TAL | 1 |
0%
|
|
| THERE WAS DOMESTIC PROBLEM | 1 |
0%
|
|
| THERE WAS INTERRUPTION BY THE VISTORS. | 1 |
0%
|
|
| THERE WAS INTERRUPTIONS BY VISITORS. THERE WERE FUNERALS IN THA PLACE SO THE RES | 1 |
0%
|
|
| THERE WAS PROBLEM OF GETTING AGES BUT GAVE GOOD RESPONSE | 1 |
0%
|
|
| THERE WERE INTERRUPTIONS DURING INTERVIEW | 1 |
0%
|
|
| THOUGH THE RESPONDENT WAS MENTALLY ILL, HE WAS ABLE TO REASON AND VERY QUICK TO | 1 |
0%
|
|
| TOBBACCO DEALER | 1 |
0%
|
|
| TOO DEMANDING FOR HELP(AID) | 1 |
0%
|
|
| TOO MUCH DISTURBANCES | 1 |
0%
|
|
| TOO MUCH DRUNKARDS | 1 |
0%
|
|
| TOO MUCH INTERRUPTIONS | 1 |
0%
|
|
| TOO MUCH INTERRUPTIONS WITH H/H CORES. | 1 |
0%
|
|
| TOO TALKATIVE | 1 |
0%
|
|
| TOOK LUNCH FOR 18 MINUTES - STOP INTERVIEW | 1 |
0%
|
|
| TOOK TIME FOR RESPONDENT TO UNDERSTAND QUESTIONS | 1 |
0%
|
|
| TOTAL INTERFERANCE BY FAMILY MEMBER | 1 |
0%
|
|
| The interview started and ended nicely | 1 |
0%
|
|
| The interview went on nicely | 1 |
0%
|
|
| The respondent had a sick baby suffering from Malaria | 1 |
0%
|
|
| The respondent received visitors and was forced to terminate the interview for s | 1 |
0%
|
|
| The respondent was in a hurry | 1 |
0%
|
|
| The respondent was very ignorant even over the simplest questions | 1 |
0%
|
|
| Took time to answer | 1 |
0%
|
|
| Two visitors came and interrupted the interview for about 2 min | 1 |
0%
|
|
| UNCOMFATABLE WITH MALARIA | 1 |
0%
|
|
| USUAL | 1 |
0%
|
|
| Use of intepreter | 1 |
0%
|
|
| VERY CO-OPERATIVE | 1 |
0%
|
|
| VERY CO-OPERATIVE AND PATIENT | 1 |
0%
|
|
| VERY COMPETENT RESPONDENT HENCE THE INTERVIEW WENT ON NICELY | 1 |
0%
|
|
| VERY COOPERATIVE | 6 |
0.2%
|
|
| VERY GOOD INTERVIEW | 1 |
0%
|
|
| VERY GOOD INTERVIEW WHICH STARTED WELL AND ENDED WELL | 1 |
0%
|
|
| VERY GOOD RESPONDENT HENCE VERY CO-OPERATIVE. | 1 |
0%
|
|
| VERY GOOD RESPONDENT. | 1 |
0%
|
|
| VERY SLOW TO RESPOND TO ANSWERS | 1 |
0%
|
|
| VERY STUBBORN WOMAN | 1 |
0%
|
|
| VERY STURBON | 1 |
0%
|
|
| VERY UNCO-OPERATIVE AND UNWILLING | 1 |
0%
|
|
| VISITORS | 13 |
0.4%
|
|
| VISITORS AND YOUNG ONES | 1 |
0%
|
|
| VISITORS BREAKS | 1 |
0%
|
|
| VISITORS COMMING IN AND OUT | 1 |
0%
|
|
| VISITORS` INTERUPTIONS | 2 |
0.1%
|
|
| VISTORS CAME FREQUENTLY | 1 |
0%
|
|
| Vaccination date was written in a book, no card | 1 |
0%
|
|
| Various interuptions | 1 |
0%
|
|
| Very good interview | 1 |
0%
|
|
| Very poor understanding | 1 |
0%
|
|
| Very sturbon initially and almost refused. Had to be forced into the interview b | 1 |
0%
|
|
| WAS VERY UNEASY | 1 |
0%
|
|
| WAS VERY WEAK | 1 |
0%
|
|
| WASHING CLOTHES RESPONDENT | 1 |
0%
|
|
| WIFE WAS PRESENT DURING INTERVIEW | 1 |
0%
|
|
| YES | 1 |
0%
|
|
| YES, THE OLD MAN WAS CALLED TO RESOLVE A DOMESTIC QUARREL, THIS ALMOST INTERRUPT | 1 |
0%
|
|
| Yes there were interuptions when a neighbour started fighting with the family | 1 |
0%
|
Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.
Interviewer instructions
To be filled in by the interviewer at the end of the interview