Research Database on Infrastructure Economic Performance 1980-2004

Aruba, Afghanistan, Angola...and 190 more, 1980 - 2004

Get Microdata

Reference ID

WLD_2004_IEP_v01_M

DOI

https://doi.org/10.48529/rx4r-zg08

Producer(s)

Antonio Estache and Ana Goicoechea

Collection(s)

Development Research Microdata Fragility, Conflict and Violence

Metadata

Documentation in PDF DDI/XML JSON

Study website

Created on

Nov 20, 2013

Last modified

Oct 26, 2023

Page views

214278

Downloads

1918

Data file: f490

Commercial Perception of Port Facilities
1=underdeveloped 7=as developed as the world's best (index based on quality perception)

* Question 4.11 in GCR 1996: Port access infrastructure meets business requirements very well 1 = strongly disagree 6 = strongly agree. Then the scale was converted to a base 7.
* Question 4.05 in GCR 1997: Port facilities and inland waters are extensive and efficient 1 = strongly disagree 7 = strongly agree.
* Question 4.06 in GCR 1999: Port facilities and inland waters are extensive and efficient 1 = strongly disagree 7 = strongly agree.
* Question 5.05 in GCR 2000: Port facilities and inland waters are extensive and efficient 1 = strongly disagree 7 = strongly agree.
* Question 6.03 in GCR 2002: Rank from 1 to 7 port facilities and inland waterways in your country. 1 = underdeveloped. 7 = as developed as the world's best.