MUS_2012_WBCS_v01_M
World Bank Country Survey 2012
Name | Country code |
---|---|
Mauritius | MUS |
Country Opinion Survey
Sample survey data [ssd]
Stakeholder
The World Bank Country Assessment Survey covered the following topics:
National
Stakeholders of the World Bank in Mauritius
Name | Affiliation |
---|---|
Public Opinion Research Group | The World Bank Group |
In June and July 2012, 303 stakeholders of the World Bank in Mauritius were invited to provide their opinions on the Bank's assistance to the country by participating in a country survey. Participants in the survey were drawn from among the office of the President or Prime Minister; the office of a Minister; the office of a Parliamentarian; employees of a ministry, ministerial department, or implementation agency; consultants/contractors working on World Bank-supported projects/programs; project management units (PMUs) overseeing implementation of a project; local government officials or staff; bilateral agencies; multilateral agencies; private sector organizations; private foundations; the financial sector/private banks; NGOs; community-based organizations (CBOs); the media; independent government institutions; trade unions; faith-based groups; academia/research institutes/think tanks; and the judiciary branch.
A total of 153 stakeholders participated in the country survey (50%).
The Questionnaire consists of 8 Sections:
A. General Issues facing Mauritius:
Respondents were asked to indicate whether Mauritius is headed in the right direction, what they thought were the top three most important development priorities, and which areas would contribute most to poverty reduction and economic growth.
B. Overall Attitudes toward the World Bank:
Respondents were asked to rate their familiarity with the World Bank, the Bank's overall effectiveness in Mauritius, Bank staff preparedness, the extent to which the Bank should seek to influence the global development agenda, agreement with various statements regarding the Bank's work, and the extent to which the Bank is an effective development partner. Respondents were also asked to indicate the sectoral areas on which it would be most productive for the Bank to focus its resources, the Bank's greatest values and greatest weaknesses in its work, the most and least effective instruments in helping to reduce poverty in Mauritius, with which groups the Bank should work more in Mauritius, and how they attribute slow or failed reform efforts.
C. World Bank Effectiveness and Results:
Respondents were asked to rate the extent to which the Bank's work helps achieve sustainable development results in Mauritius, the extent to which the Bank meets Mauritius's need for knowledge services and financial instruments, the extent to which the World Bank's programs and financing contribute to improvements in Mauritius, and the Bank's level of effectiveness across thirty-six development areas, such as economic growth and anti-corruption.
D. The World Bank's Knowledge:
Respondents were asked to indicate how frequently they consult Bank knowledge/research, the areas on which the Bank should focus its research efforts, and to rate the effectiveness and quality of the Bank's knowledge/research, including how significant a contribution it makes to development results and its technical quality.
E. Working with the World Bank:
Respondents were asked to rate their level of agreement with a series of statements regarding working with the Bank, such as the World Bank's "Safeguard Policy" requirements being reasonable and the Bank disbursing funds promptly.
F. The Future Role of the World Bank in Mauritius:
Respondents were asked to rate how significant a role the Bank should play in Mauritius in the near future and to indicate what the Bank should do to make itself of greater value in Mauritius.
G. Communication and Information Sharing:
Respondents were asked to indicate how they get information about economic and social development issues, how they prefer to receive information from the Bank, their access to the Internet, and their usage and evaluation of the Bank's website. Respondents were asked about their awareness of the Bank's Access to Information policy, past information requests from the Bank, and their level of agreement that they use more data from the World Bank as a result of the Bank's Open Data policy. Respondents were also asked to indicate their level of agreement that they know how to find information from the Bank and that the Bank is responsive to information requests.
H. Background Information:
Respondents were asked to indicate their current position, specialization, whether they professionally collaborate with the World Bank, their exposure to the Bank in Mauritius, and their geographic location.
Start | End |
---|---|
2012-06 | 2012-07 |
Respondents received questionnaires via courier or post and returned it similarly. Respondents were asked about: general issues facing Mauritius, their overall attitudes toward the Bank, the World Bank's effectiveness and results, the Bank's knowledge, working with the World Bank, the Bank's future role in Mauritius, and the Bank's communication and information sharing in Mauritius.
Use of the dataset must be acknowledged using a citation which would include:
The user of the data acknowledges that the original collector of the data, the authorized distributor of the data, and the relevant funding agency bear no responsibility for use of the data or for interpretations or inferences based upon such uses.
Name | Affiliation | |
---|---|---|
Public Opinion Research Group | The World Bank | countrysurveys@worldbankgroup.org |
The World Bank Microdata Library | The World Bank |
DDI_MUS_2012_WBCS_v01_M_WB
Name | Role |
---|---|
World Bank, Development Economics Data Group | Preparation of the metadata |
2013-12-17
Version 01 (December 2013)
This site uses cookies to optimize functionality and give you the best possible experience. If you continue to navigate this website beyond this page, cookies will be placed on your browser. To learn more about cookies, click here.