Hunger Safety Net Programme Impact Evaluation 2012, Second Follow-up Round
Kenya, 2012
Oxford Policy Management Limited
Created on
January 15, 2014
Last modified
January 15, 2014
Page views
79382
Download
13821
Documentation in PDF
Metadata
DDI/XML
JSON
- Data files
- 3moves
- 3table
- 5table
- 6education
- 6health
- 6personnel
- 6table
- 7food
- 7food1
- 7other
- 7other1
- comq_linking_FU2
- comq_weights
- coversheet
- section3
- section4
- section5
- section8
- section9
- section10
- section11
- section99
- ClusterMaster
- disaggregation_data
- HHAsset
- HHAssetLivelihood
- HHBeneficiaries
- HHCHild
- HHconsData
- HHCopingStrategy
- HHData
- HHEmploymentProgramme
- HHEnterprise
- HHEnterpriseMember
- HHFoodAid
- HHFoodconsData
- HHImpact
- HHItemPurchaseDistance
- HHLivestock
- HHMember
- HHMover
- HHOpMon
- HHOtherCashTrans
- HHPreambleTracking
- HHProvidedFor
- HHSampleRecord
- HHTransfer
- HHVisit
- hh_weights_original
6.05:Nearest educ fclty- fees (q606)
Data file: 6education
Overview
Valid:
524
Invalid:
448
Type:
Discrete
Decimal:
0
Width:
5
Range:
0 - 36000
Format:
Numeric
Questions and instructions
Categories
| Value | Category | Cases | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 5 |
1%
|
|
| 1 | 4 |
0.8%
|
|
| 50 | 1 |
0.2%
|
|
| 98 | DK | 21 |
4%
|
| 99 | No Fee | 149 |
28.4%
|
| 100 | 12 |
2.3%
|
|
| 150 | 3 |
0.6%
|
|
| 200 | 17 |
3.2%
|
|
| 270 | 1 |
0.2%
|
|
| 300 | 15 |
2.9%
|
|
| 450 | 2 |
0.4%
|
|
| 480 | 3 |
0.6%
|
|
| 500 | 18 |
3.4%
|
|
| 600 | 16 |
3.1%
|
|
| 700 | 1 |
0.2%
|
|
| 720 | 2 |
0.4%
|
|
| 800 | 1 |
0.2%
|
|
| 840 | 1 |
0.2%
|
|
| 900 | 24 |
4.6%
|
|
| 960 | 3 |
0.6%
|
|
| 1000 | 8 |
1.5%
|
|
| 1080 | 1 |
0.2%
|
|
| 1200 | 31 |
5.9%
|
|
| 1440 | 1 |
0.2%
|
|
| 1500 | 1 |
0.2%
|
|
| 1800 | 1 |
0.2%
|
|
| 2000 | 2 |
0.4%
|
|
| 2400 | 33 |
6.3%
|
|
| 2460 | 2 |
0.4%
|
|
| 2500 | 3 |
0.6%
|
|
| 2700 | 4 |
0.8%
|
|
| 2800 | 1 |
0.2%
|
|
| 3000 | 6 |
1.1%
|
|
| 3600 | 5 |
1%
|
|
| 4800 | 2 |
0.4%
|
|
| 5000 | 3 |
0.6%
|
|
| 5500 | 2 |
0.4%
|
|
| 6000 | 6 |
1.1%
|
|
| 7000 | 1 |
0.2%
|
|
| 8400 | 1 |
0.2%
|
|
| 9000 | 4 |
0.8%
|
|
| 10000 | 2 |
0.4%
|
|
| 12000 | 8 |
1.5%
|
|
| 14000 | 1 |
0.2%
|
|
| 15000 | 17 |
3.2%
|
|
| 16000 | 1 |
0.2%
|
|
| 16200 | 1 |
0.2%
|
|
| 17000 | 8 |
1.5%
|
|
| 17300 | 1 |
0.2%
|
|
| 17750 | 1 |
0.2%
|
|
| 18000 | 7 |
1.3%
|
|
| 19000 | 1 |
0.2%
|
|
| 20000 | 12 |
2.3%
|
|
| 21050 | 1 |
0.2%
|
|
| 22000 | 3 |
0.6%
|
|
| 23000 | 9 |
1.7%
|
|
| 24000 | 2 |
0.4%
|
|
| 24300 | 1 |
0.2%
|
|
| 24500 | 1 |
0.2%
|
|
| 25000 | 12 |
2.3%
|
|
| 26000 | 4 |
0.8%
|
|
| 26400 | 1 |
0.2%
|
|
| 28000 | 2 |
0.4%
|
|
| 30000 | 4 |
0.8%
|
|
| 30500 | 1 |
0.2%
|
|
| 31000 | 1 |
0.2%
|
|
| 34400 | 1 |
0.2%
|
|
| 35000 | 1 |
0.2%
|
|
| 36000 | 3 |
0.6%
|
|
| Sysmiss | 448 |
Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.