Recognised Seasonal Employer Program Impact Evaluation 2007-2010

Tonga, 2007 - 2010

Get Microdata

Reference ID

TON_2007_RSEIE_v01_M

DOI

https://doi.org/10.48529/vcxx-5c82

Producer(s)

David McKenzie

Collection(s)

Impact Evaluation Surveys

Metadata

Documentation in PDF DDI/XML JSON

Created on

Apr 07, 2014

Last modified

Apr 07, 2014

Page views

143926

Downloads

5520

Q4e. Effect on non-customary Monetary Contributions (s10q4e)

Data file: round3HHa

Overview

Valid: 257

Invalid: 187

Type: Discrete

Decimal: 0

Start: 491

End: 491

Width: 1

Range: 1 - 3

Format: Numeric

Questions and instructions

Question pretext

Answer this section only if your household has never had a RSE seasonal worker in New Zealand and does not have a seasonal worker who has returned

Literal question

How has the RSE involvement of members of your village or community affected the following?
e. The monetary contribution expected from your household for village/community activities other than custom events

Categories

Value	Category	Cases
1	1 = More money is expected from us	98	38.1%
2	2 = The same is expected	159	61.9%
3	3 = Less is expected from us	0	0%
Sysmiss		187

Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.

Back to Catalog