Recognised Seasonal Employer Program Impact Evaluation 2007-2010

Tonga, 2007 - 2010

Get Microdata

Reference ID

TON_2007_RSEIE_v01_M

DOI

https://doi.org/10.48529/vcxx-5c82

Producer(s)

David McKenzie

Collection(s)

Impact Evaluation Surveys

Metadata

Documentation in PDF DDI/XML JSON

Created on

Apr 07, 2014

Last modified

Apr 07, 2014

Page views

147272

Downloads

5542

Q4d. Effect on monetary contributions (s10q4d)

Data file: round3HHa

Overview

Valid: 257

Invalid: 187

Type: Discrete

Decimal: 0

Start: 490

End: 490

Width: 1

Range: 1 - 3

Format: Numeric

Questions and instructions

Question pretext

Answer this section only if your household has never had a RSE seasonal worker in New Zealand and does not have a seasonal worker who has returned

Literal question

How has the RSE involvement of members of your village or community affected the following?
d. The amount of money used for custom events

Categories

Value	Category	Cases
1	1=More money is expected from us	128	49.8%
2	2=Same is expected from us	129	50.2%
3	3=Less money expected from us	0	0%
Sysmiss		187

Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.

Back to Catalog