Recognised Seasonal Employer Program Impact Evaluation 2007-2010
Vanuatu, 2007 - 2010
Get Microdata
Reference ID
VUT_2007_RSEIE_v01_M
Producer(s)
David McKenzie
Collection(s)
Metadata
Created on
Apr 09, 2014
Last modified
Apr 09, 2014
Page views
192232
Downloads
139184
Q8. Describe how agents pick RSE participants (s10q8)
Data file: Vanuatu_replicationdata
Overview
Valid:
165
Invalid:
0
Type:
Discrete
Start:
1075
End:
1174
Width:
100
Range:
-
Format:
character
Questions and instructions
Categories
| Value | Category | Cases | |
|---|---|---|---|
| AFTER CHECK BACK, S/SOTNS INTERVIEW & APPLICATION FORM: GOOD CHARACTER, AT, STRONG | 1 |
0.6%
|
|
| AGEN CHOOSE BASE ON LOLIHOR COUNCIL ANDBEHAVIOUR IN COMMUNITY | 1 |
0.6%
|
|
| AGENT AND BY LOOKING AT OUR HEALTH | 1 |
0.6%
|
|
| AGENT CHOOSE BASED ON CHARACTERISTICS E.G. HARD WORKING, GOOD HEALTH, GOOD REPORT | 1 |
0.6%
|
|
| AGENT CHOOSE BASED ON SOME CRITERIA... | 1 |
0.6%
|
|
| AGENT CHOOSES BASED ON CHARACTERISTICS E.G. NO SMOKING, NO DRUNKEN... | 1 |
0.6%
|
|
| AGENT CHOOSES WHO MEET ALL OF THEIR EXPENSES | 1 |
0.6%
|
|
| AGENT CHOOSES WHO MET ALL EXPENSES | 1 |
0.6%
|
|
| AGENT CHOSE BASED ON AGENT'S CRITERIA?? | 1 |
0.6%
|
|
| AGENT CHOSE THROUGH MY APPLICATION | 1 |
0.6%
|
|
| AGENT SELECT EACH MEMBER FROM EACH COMMUNITY | 1 |
0.6%
|
|
| AGENT SELECTS WITH CRITERIA RSE PROGRAM | 1 |
0.6%
|
|
| AGENT/LOLOHOR COUNCIL CHOOSE | 1 |
0.6%
|
|
| AGENTS CHECKED THEY ARE HEALTY,NO CRIME RECORD, GOOD WORKER | 1 |
0.6%
|
|
| AGENTS CHOOSE BY SKILLS AND GOOD HEALTH. | 1 |
0.6%
|
|
| AGENTS CHOOSE THEM UNDER THEIR CRITERIA, LIKE LANDGUAGE SKILLS, MEDICAL RECORDS CLEAR. | 1 |
0.6%
|
|
| AGENTS CHOOSE WORKERS TO WORK IN NZ UNDER VILLAGE LEADER APPROVAL, AGENT FINALISE THROUGH INTERVIEW. | 1 |
0.6%
|
|
| AGENTS RECRUIT BY HEALTH, SKILLS, CHARACTER. | 1 |
0.6%
|
|
| AGENTS SCREEN THROUGH APPLICATIONS | 1 |
0.6%
|
|
| APPLICATION, ATTITUDE AND BEHAVIOUR | 1 |
0.6%
|
|
| APPLIED TO S/SOTNS | 1 |
0.6%
|
|
| BECAUSE I WAS OBEDIENT WHEN I WENT TO NZ. | 1 |
0.6%
|
|
| BECAUSE OF GOOD HEALTH,SMART IN WORK IN NZ. | 1 |
0.6%
|
|
| BY THE SELECTION CRITERIA, RECRUIT THRUGH S/SOLUS | 1 |
0.6%
|
|
| CHARACTERISTICS THAT THE EMPLOYERS IN NZ NEED | 1 |
0.6%
|
|
| CHIEFS REFERENCE ON CHARACTER | 1 |
0.6%
|
|
| CLEAN RECORD FROM POLICE AND NO MEDICAL PROBLEM. | 1 |
0.6%
|
|
| DEPT OF LABOUR , AFTER THE VIS AND PASSPORT PROCESS, MAKE FINAL LIST OF YOU GO AND NOT. NOT CLEAR | 1 |
0.6%
|
|
| DO NOT KNOW | 1 |
0.6%
|
|
| DONT DRINK ALCOHOL | 1 |
0.6%
|
|
| DONT KNOW | 5 |
3%
|
|
| DONT KNOW HOW THEY CHOOSE. | 1 |
0.6%
|
|
| DONT KNOW THE AGENTS | 1 |
0.6%
|
|
| EACH FROM EACH COMMUNITY | 1 |
0.6%
|
|
| EACH FROM EACH VILLAGE | 1 |
0.6%
|
|
| EACH MEMBER FROM EACH COMMUNITY | 2 |
1.2%
|
|
| EACH MEMBER IN EACH COMMUNITY | 2 |
1.2%
|
|
| EACH MEMEBER FROM EACH VILLAGE | 1 |
0.6%
|
|
| EACH ONE FROM EACH COMMUNITY | 1 |
0.6%
|
|
| FILLED AN APPLICATION FORM | 1 |
0.6%
|
|
| FRANC ABEL | 1 |
0.6%
|
|
| GOOD CHARACTER, HEALTHY | 1 |
0.6%
|
|
| GOOD HEALTH AND NO CRIMINAL RECORD ACT. | 1 |
0.6%
|
|
| GOOD HEALTH AND PASSPORT MUST COMPLETE OR HAVE. | 1 |
0.6%
|
|
| GOOD HEALTH, AND NO CRIMINAL RECORD | 1 |
0.6%
|
|
| GOOD HEALTHY AND NO CRIMINAL RECORD OR ACT. | 1 |
0.6%
|
|
| GOOD WORK, NO LAZY, NO DRUNK, NO SMOKE | 1 |
0.6%
|
|
| HAD A MEETING AND TALK TO THE PEOPLE. | 1 |
0.6%
|
|
| HARD WORKING PERSON | 1 |
0.6%
|
|
| HAVE GOOD HEALTH AND VISE | 1 |
0.6%
|
|
| HE SAW THAT AM HEALTHY, FIT TO WORK IN NZ | 1 |
0.6%
|
|
| HEALTH AND NO CRIMINAL RECORD | 1 |
0.6%
|
|
| HEALTH AND OBEDENT | 1 |
0.6%
|
|
| HEALTH AND OBEDIENT | 1 |
0.6%
|
|
| HEALTH AND SMART TO WORK. TRUST THAT I CAN CARRY OUT THE JOB. | 1 |
0.6%
|
|
| HEALTH OF A PERSON. | 1 |
0.6%
|
|
| HEALTH RECORD AND POLICE RECORD CLEAN. | 1 |
0.6%
|
|
| HEALTH RECORD, POLICE RECORD ARE OKEY | 1 |
0.6%
|
|
| HEALTHY, SOCIAL ATTITUDE, SMART... | 1 |
0.6%
|
|
| I DONT KNOW | 3 |
1.8%
|
|
| I DONT KNOW HOW AGENT SELECT | 1 |
0.6%
|
|
| I DONT KNOW HOW AGENTS CHOSE PEOPLE | 1 |
0.6%
|
|
| LOLIHOR COUNCIL | 1 |
0.6%
|
|
| LOOK FOR FIT, HEALTLY WORKERS WITH NO PROBLEMS. | 1 |
0.6%
|
|
| MAN POWER AND ACTIVE | 1 |
0.6%
|
|
| MUST BE A GOOD MAN. | 1 |
0.6%
|
|
| MUST BE HARD WORKING PERSON, AND GOOD BEHAVIOUR | 1 |
0.6%
|
|
| MUST SPEAK GOOD ENGISH AND MEDICAL FIT | 1 |
0.6%
|
|
| NAMES GIVEN AND GO THROUGH INTERVIEW,MEDICAL ,POLICE CLEARANCE ETC | 1 |
0.6%
|
|
| NEED BELONGINGS SCREENING BEFORE SENDING? | 1 |
0.6%
|
|
| NGO & CHIEF MADE AWARENESS TO RECRUIT (IE THEY JUST CHOSE) | 1 |
0.6%
|
|
| NGO WALK AROUND,ANNOUNCE AND RECRUIT WORKERS | 1 |
0.6%
|
|
| NGO'S GO AROUND THE ISLAND ANNOUNCE AND RECRUIT WORKERS | 1 |
0.6%
|
|
| NGO'S WALK AROUND AND ANNOUNCE AND RECRUIT WORKERS | 1 |
0.6%
|
|
| NGO'S WALKED AROUND THE ISLAND ANNOUNCE AND RECRUIT WORKERS | 1 |
0.6%
|
|
| NO ALCOHOLIC, NO HEALTH PROBLEM, CHURCH LEADER RECOMMADATION | 1 |
0.6%
|
|
| NO CRIMINAL FRIENDS/ RECORD, NO HEALTH PROBLELM | 1 |
0.6%
|
|
| NO CRIMINAL?? | 1 |
0.6%
|
|
| NO HEALTH PROBLELM, NON ALCOHOLIC | 1 |
0.6%
|
|
| NO HEALTH PROBLEM, CRIMINAL RECORD, ALCOHOLIC | 1 |
0.6%
|
|
| NON ALCOHO | 1 |
0.6%
|
|
| NON ALCOHOLIC PERSON AND STRONG | 1 |
0.6%
|
|
| NON ALCOHOLIC, HEALTH PROBLELM, NO CRIMINAL RECORD | 1 |
0.6%
|
|
| NON ALCOHOLIC, HEALTY, NO ORIGINAL GUEST | 1 |
0.6%
|
|
| NON ALCOHOLIC, NO CRIMINAL RECORD. | 1 |
0.6%
|
|
| NON ALCOHOLIC, NO CRIMINAL GOES | 1 |
0.6%
|
|
| NOT ALCOHOLIC AND STRONG | 1 |
0.6%
|
|
| NOT STATED | 2 |
1.2%
|
|
| PEOPLE WITH GOOD BACK GROUND | 1 |
0.6%
|
|
| PERSONAL CHARATERISTICS | 1 |
0.6%
|
|
| RECOMMENDATION FROM PASTOR & CHIEF IN OUR APPLICATION | 1 |
0.6%
|
|
| RECRUIT THROUGH APPLICATION | 3 |
1.8%
|
|
| RECRUITING THROUGH THE APPLICATION MADE. | 1 |
0.6%
|
|
| RECRUITING THROUGH THE APPLICATIONS | 1 |
0.6%
|
|
| REFERRED | 1 |
0.6%
|
|
| S/SOTNS APPLICATION FORM INTERVIEW | 1 |
0.6%
|
|
| SELECT EACH FROM NORTH AND WEST AMBRYM | 1 |
0.6%
|
|
| SELECT EACH MEMBER FROM EACH COMMUNITY | 3 |
1.8%
|
|
| SELECT MAN OR WOMAN FROM THE AREAS/ COMMUNITY WHO WANT TO TAKE PART. | 1 |
0.6%
|
|
| SELECTED BY THE AGENT | 1 |
0.6%
|
|
| SELECTED THROUGH THE APPLICATION FILLED UP BY INTERESTED PERSON | 1 |
0.6%
|
|
| SELECTION CATERGORY IS UNKNOWN | 1 |
0.6%
|
|
| SELECTION FIRST DONE AT ERATAP COUNCIL THEN AGENT. | 1 |
0.6%
|
|
| SELLECT THROUGH THE APPLICATION MADE | 1 |
0.6%
|
|
| SKILLS, GOOD HEALTH, NO CRIMINAL ACT. | 1 |
0.6%
|
|
| SMART PEOPLE WITH NO CRIMINAL RECORD | 1 |
0.6%
|
|
| STRENGTH, SPORTMAN, STRONG ON DECIPLINE | 1 |
0.6%
|
|
| STRONG, HEALTHY AND OF GOOD COURAGE | 1 |
0.6%
|
|
| STRONG, HEALTHY CAPABLE PERSON | 1 |
0.6%
|
|
| STRONG, HEALTHY, CAPABLE TO DO THE WORK. | 1 |
0.6%
|
|
| THE AGENTS CHOOSE THROUGH THE APPLICATION OF EACH RECRUIT WORKERS THROUGH THE RSE. | 1 |
0.6%
|
|
| THE NGO GO AROUND AND ANNOUNCE AND RECRUIT THE WORKERS. | 1 |
0.6%
|
|
| THEIR RECRIUT THROUGH THE APPLICATION MADE BY THE PEOPLE | 1 |
0.6%
|
|
| THEY ONLY RECRUIT YOU WHEN YOU ONLY FINISH PAY YOUR DOCUMENTS | 1 |
0.6%
|
|
| THOSE WHO SPEAKS WELL ENGLISH | 1 |
0.6%
|
|
| THROUGH AN INTERVIEW | 1 |
0.6%
|
|
| THROUGH APPLICATION | 3 |
1.8%
|
|
| THROUGH APPLICATION AND INTERVIEW | 2 |
1.2%
|
|
| THROUGH APPLICATION FORM AND INTERVIEW. | 1 |
0.6%
|
|
| THROUGH COMMUNITY | 1 |
0.6%
|
|
| THROUGH INDIVIDUAL INTERVIEWS | 1 |
0.6%
|
|
| THROUGH INTERVIEW PANEL | 1 |
0.6%
|
|
| THROUGH OUR PASTOR | 1 |
0.6%
|
|
| THROUGH THE APPLICATION | 12 |
7.3%
|
|
| THROUGH THE APPLICATION FORM | 1 |
0.6%
|
|
| THROUGH THE APPLICATION GIVEN TO THEM | 3 |
1.8%
|
|
| THROUGH THE APPLICATIONS COLLECTED | 1 |
0.6%
|
|
| THROUGH THE APPLICATIONS COLLECTED. | 1 |
0.6%
|
|
| THROUGH THE CHIEF AND CHURCH LETTER OF APPROVAL | 1 |
0.6%
|
|
| THROUGH THE COMMUNITY | 1 |
0.6%
|
|
| UNDER THE CRITRIAS, SPEAK ENGLISH, CLEAN RECORD, MEDICAL FITNESS | 1 |
0.6%
|
|
| WE DONT KNOW HOW AGENTS RECRUIT US | 1 |
0.6%
|
|
| WE DONT KNOW HOW AGENTS RECRUITS | 1 |
0.6%
|
|
| WE DONT KNOW THE PROCCESS OF RECRUITMENT | 1 |
0.6%
|
|
| WHO IS FIT TO DO THE WORK, POLICE RECORD OKEY, SPEAK ENGISH, MEDICAL OKEY | 1 |
0.6%
|
|
| YOUR SKILL AND FITTNESS | 1 |
0.6%
|
Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.