Recognised Seasonal Employer Program Impact Evaluation 2007-2010

Vanuatu, 2007 - 2010

Get Microdata

Reference ID

VUT_2007_RSEIE_v01_M

DOI

https://doi.org/10.48529/xavh-sq13

Producer(s)

David McKenzie

Collection(s)

Impact Evaluation Surveys

Metadata

Documentation in PDF DDI/XML JSON

Created on

Apr 09, 2014

Last modified

Apr 09, 2014

Page views

140470

Downloads

138690

Q4d. Effect on monetary contributions (s10q4d)

Data file: round3HHa

Overview

Valid: 115

Invalid: 273

Type: Discrete

Decimal: 0

Start: 501

End: 501

Width: 1

Range: 1 - 3

Format: Numeric

Questions and instructions

Question pretext

Answer this section only if your household has never had a RSE seasonal worker in New Zealand and does not have a seasonal worker who has returned

Literal question

How has the RSE involvement of members of your village or community affected the following?
d. The amount of money used for custom events

Categories

Value	Category	Cases
1	1=More money spent	13	11.3%
2	2=No change	73	63.5%
3	3=Less money spent	29	25.2%
Sysmiss		273

Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.

Back to Catalog