Recognised Seasonal Employer Program Impact Evaluation 2007-2010

Vanuatu, 2007 - 2010

Get Microdata

Reference ID

VUT_2007_RSEIE_v01_M

DOI

https://doi.org/10.48529/xavh-sq13

Producer(s)

David McKenzie

Collection(s)

Impact Evaluation Surveys

Metadata

Documentation in PDF DDI/XML JSON

Created on

Apr 09, 2014

Last modified

Apr 09, 2014

Page views

275318

Downloads

140131

Q2A. Which system of RSE selection would you prefer? (s12q2a)

Data file: round4HHa

Overview

Valid: 339

Invalid: 10

Type: Discrete

Decimal: 0

Start: 14

End: 14

Width: 1

Range: 1 - 4

Format: Numeric

Questions and instructions

Question pretext

Please ask the adult in the household who will have the next birthday to answer this section

Literal question

New Zealand's Recognized Seasonal Employer (RSE) work scheme has now been in place two years and Australia has recently launched its own seasonal work program, the Australian Pacific Seasonal Workers Pilot Scheme. We are interested in your personal opinion about what seems best in terms of recruitment for these types of programs. You do not need to have participated in these programs to answer this question.

One approach to recruitment is to pick only a few people from each village, to allow as many villages as possible to participate in the seasonal work program. An alternative is to pick more people from the same village to allow workers to have more friends around them while abroad and to allow communities in Australia and New Zealand to begin to build relationships with particular villages in Vanuatu. Which system would you prefer?

Categories

Value	Category	Cases
1	Recruitment from as many different villages as possible	124	36.6%
2	Recruitment focused on fewer villages with more people from each village recruited	91	26.8%
3	Either is equally ok	78	23%
4	Do not know	46	13.6%
Sysmiss		10

Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.

Back to Catalog