Enterprise Survey 2013

Serbia, 2013

Get Microdata

Reference ID

SRB_2013_ES_v01_M

DOI

https://doi.org/10.48529/tyj4-8143

Producer(s)

World Bank, European Bank for Reconstruction and Development

Collection(s)

Enterprise Surveys

Metadata

Documentation in PDF DDI/XML JSON

Study website

Created on

Apr 10, 2014

Last modified

May 19, 2014

Page views

38626

Downloads

4262

Private payments/gifts/other benefits to Parliamentarians - direct impa (ECAq44a)

Data file: Serbia-2013-full data

Overview

Valid: 360

Invalid: 0

Type: Discrete

Decimal: 0

Start: 1078

End: 1079

Width: 2

Range: -9 - 5

Format: Numeric

Questions and instructions

Literal question

It is often said that firms make unofficial payments/gifts, private payments or other benefits to public officials to gain advantages in the drafting of laws, decrees, regulations, and other binding government decisions. To what extent have the following practices had a direct impact on this establishment?
Private payments/gifts or other benefits to Parliamentarians to affect their votes

Categories

Value	Category	Cases
-9	Don't know	51	14.2%
-8	Refused	0	0%
-7	DOES NOT APPLY	48	13.3%
1	No impact	213	59.2%
2	Minor impact	27	7.5%
3	Moderate impact	13	3.6%
4	Major impact	5	1.4%
5	Decisive impact	3	0.8%

Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.

Interviewer instructions

Sensitive question, no clarification can be offered

Others

Notes

ECAq44a. Private payments/gifts/other benefits to Parliamentarians - direct impact

Back to Catalog