National Panel Survey 2011-2012, Wave III
Uganda, 2011 - 2012
Get Microdata
Reference ID
UGA_2011_UNPS_v01_M
Producer(s)
Uganda Bureau of Statistics (UBOS)
Collection(s)
Metadata
Created on
Sep 09, 2014
Last modified
Jan 30, 2020
Page views
273412
Downloads
52726
- Data files
- AGSEC1
- AGSEC3A
- AGSEC3B
- AGSEC4A
- AGSEC4B
- AGSEC5A
- AGSEC5B
- AGSEC6A
- AGSEC6B
- AGSEC6C
- AGSEC7A
- AGSEC7B
- AGSEC8A
- AGSEC8B
- AGSEC8C
- AGSEC8D
- AGSEC8E
- AGSEC9
- AGSEC10
- CSEC1
- CSEC2a
- CSEC2b
- CSEC2c
- CSEC2c_1
- CSEC3_1
- CSEC3a
- CSEC3b
- CSEC3c
- CSEC3d
- CSEC3e
- CSEC3f
- CSEC3g
- CSEC3h
- CSEC3i
- CSEC3j
- CSEC3k
- CSEC3L
- CSEC3m
- CSEC4ab
- CSEC4c
- CSEC4d
- CSEC4e
- CSEC4f
- CSEC4g
- CSEC4h
- CSEC4i
- CSEC4j
- CSEC4k
- CSEC4l
- CSEC4m
- CSEC4n
- CSEC4o
- CSEC4p
- CSEC4p_B
- CSEC4q
- CSEC4r
- CSEC5_1
- CSEC5a
- CSEC5b
- CSEC5c
- CSEC5d
- CSEC5e
- CSEC6a
- CSEC6b
- CSEC6c
- CSEC6d
- CSEC6e
- GSEC1
- GSEC2
- GSEC3
- GSEC4
- GSEC5
- GSEC6A
- GSEC6B
- GSEC6C
- GSEC8
- GSEC9A
- GSEC9B
- GSEC10A
- GSEC10B
- GSEC10C
- GSEC11
- GSEC12
- GSEC14
- GSEC15B
- GSEC15BB
- GSEC15C
- GSEC15D
- GSEC16
- GSEC17A
- GSEC17B
- GSEC17C
- GSEC18
- GSEC18A
- GSEC18B
- UNPS_Geovars_1112
- WSEC2A
- WSEC2B_1
- WSEC2B_2
-
UNPS 2011-12
Consumption
Aggregate - HH_SEC10_2
- AGSEC2A
- AGSEC2B
Other constraints faced by this sub-county in terms if maintenance and repair of (cd5q21_other)
Data file: CSEC5d
Overview
Valid:
85
Invalid:
0
Type:
Discrete
Start:
30
End:
90
Width:
61
Range:
-
Format:
character
Questions and instructions
Categories
| Value | Category | Cases | |
|---|---|---|---|
| BAD WEATHER | 1 |
1.2%
|
|
| BAD WEATHER | 7 |
8.2%
|
|
| BAD TERRAIN | 1 |
1.2%
|
|
| BAD WEATHER | 6 |
7.1%
|
|
| DELAY BY PFOCUREMENT PROCESS | 1 |
1.2%
|
|
| DELAY IN PROCEREMENT AND TENDERING PROCESS | 1 |
1.2%
|
|
| DELAY IN PROCUREMENT PROCESS | 4 |
4.7%
|
|
| DELAY IN PROCUREMENT PROCESS | 1 |
1.2%
|
|
| DELAY IN PROCUREMENT PROCESS | 1 |
1.2%
|
|
| DELAY IN TENDERING AND PROCUREMENT PROCESS | 1 |
1.2%
|
|
| DELAY BY CONTRACTORS | 1 |
1.2%
|
|
| DELAY IN PROCUREMENT PROCESS | 3 |
3.5%
|
|
| INADEQUATE ROAD EQUIPMENTS | 1 |
1.2%
|
|
| LACK OF TECHNICAL PEOPLE | 1 |
1.2%
|
|
| LACK OF LOCAL REVUNUE | 1 |
1.2%
|
|
| LACK OF TECHNICAL SUPPORT | 3 |
3.5%
|
|
| LONG TENDERING PROCESS | 1 |
1.2%
|
|
| LUCK OF EQUIPMENT | 1 |
1.2%
|
|
| LUCK OF STAFF ACCOMODATIONS | 1 |
1.2%
|
|
| MOUNTANEOS TERRAIN | 1 |
1.2%
|
|
| NATURE OF SOIL | 1 |
1.2%
|
|
| NO -EQUIPMENTS | 1 |
1.2%
|
|
| POLITICAL INFLUENCE | 1 |
1.2%
|
|
| POLITICAL INTERFERENCE | 1 |
1.2%
|
|
| POLITICAL INTREFERNCE | 1 |
1.2%
|
|
| POOR WORK BY CONTRACTORS | 2 |
2.4%
|
|
| POOR AWARD OF CONRACTS BY THE DISTRICT LEADING TO SHOODY WORK | 1 |
1.2%
|
|
| POOR QUALITY WORK BY THE CONTRACTORS | 1 |
1.2%
|
|
| POOR TENDERING SYSTEM | 2 |
2.4%
|
|
| POOR WORK DONE BY CONTRACTORS | 1 |
1.2%
|
|
| POOR WORKMANSHIP | 1 |
1.2%
|
|
| PPDA(procurement) process takes verl long | 1 |
1.2%
|
|
| PROCUREMENT UNIT DELAYS IN ISSUING CONTRACT WORKS | 1 |
1.2%
|
|
| RELOCATION OF UTILITY SERVICES | 1 |
1.2%
|
|
| ROAD RESERVE ENCHROCHMENT | 1 |
1.2%
|
|
| SODDY WORK BY CONTRACTORS | 1 |
1.2%
|
|
| SODDY WORK DONE BY CONTRACTORS | 1 |
1.2%
|
|
| SUB -COUNTY DOESN,T HAVE SAY ON CONTRACTORS | 1 |
1.2%
|
|
| SUB-COUNTY DOESN,T HAVE ACCESS TO PROCUREMENT PROCESS | 1 |
1.2%
|
|
| TERRAIN | 3 |
3.5%
|
|
| THE TYPE OF SOILS IN THE AREA | 1 |
1.2%
|
|
| UNPREDICTABLE WEATHER | 1 |
1.2%
|
|
| bad terrain and no good machinery | 1 |
1.2%
|
|
| bad weather | 3 |
3.5%
|
|
| bad weather and terrain | 1 |
1.2%
|
|
| contractors use alot of money | 1 |
1.2%
|
|
| delay by contractors | 1 |
1.2%
|
|
| delay in procurement | 1 |
1.2%
|
|
| distirct has no road unit so hinders works within | 1 |
1.2%
|
|
| district conceal much information on road | 1 |
1.2%
|
|
| extreme weather conditions | 1 |
1.2%
|
|
| heavy rains damage roads | 1 |
1.2%
|
|
| high cost of compensiating land owners | 1 |
1.2%
|
|
| inadequate local revenue sources | 1 |
1.2%
|
|
| incompetent road contractors | 1 |
1.2%
|
|
| labour is expensive | 1 |
1.2%
|
|
| lackof technical support | 1 |
1.2%
|
|
| no response from district | 1 |
1.2%
|
|
| poor terrain | 1 |
1.2%
|
|
| private sector is expensive | 1 |
1.2%
|
|
| tendering system that's not timely and not good | 1 |
1.2%
|
Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.