Land Tenure Regularization Pilot Impact Evaluation 2010
Rwanda, 2010
Get Microdata
Reference ID
RWA_2010_LTRPIE_v01_M_v01_A_PUF
Producer(s)
Daniel Ali, Klaus Deininger, Markus Goldstein
Collection(s)
Metadata
Created on
Dec 01, 2015
Last modified
Dec 01, 2015
Page views
99008
Downloads
1599
- Data files
- S1_PUF
- S2_PUF
- S3_PUF
- S4_PUF
- S5_PUF
- S6_PUF
- S7_PUF
- S8_PUF
- S9_PUF
- S10_PUF
- S51_PUF
- S1_Biguhu_PUF
- S2_Biguhu_PUF
- S3_Biguhu_PUF
- S4_Biguhu_PUF
- S6_Biguhu_PUF
- S7_Biguhu_PUF
- S8_Biguhu_PUF
- S9_Biguhu_PUF
- S10_Biguhu_PUF
- S5_Biguhu_PUF
- S1_Nyamugwagwa_PUF
- S2_Nyamugwagwa_PUF
- S3_Nyamugwagwa_PUF
- S4_Nyamugwagwa_PUF
- S5_Nyamugwagwa_PUF
- S5_q1_Nyamugwagwa_PUF
- S6_Nyamugwagwa_PUF
- S7_Nyamugwagwa_PUF
- S8_Nyamugwagwa_PUF
- S9_Nyamugwagwa_PUF
- S10_Nyamugwagwa_PUF
17. secondary occupation (s1q17)
Data file: S1_PUF
Overview
Valid:
4791
Invalid:
12539
Type:
Discrete
Decimal:
0
Start:
49
End:
50
Width:
2
Range:
0 - 22
Format:
Numeric
Questions and instructions
Literal question
Secondary occupation of [NAME]
Categories
| Value | Category | Cases | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | none | 0 |
0%
|
| 1 | farmer of family farm worker | 733 |
15.3%
|
| 2 | domestic work | 1098 |
22.9%
|
| 3 | farm laborer | 50 |
1%
|
| 4 | other manual worker | 43 |
0.9%
|
| 5 | carpenter/builder | 50 |
1%
|
| 6 | tailor | 26 |
0.5%
|
| 7 | weaver | 7 |
0.1%
|
| 8 | craft worker/potter | 13 |
0.3%
|
| 9 | blacksmith | 11 |
0.2%
|
| 10 | driver/mechanic | 38 |
0.8%
|
| 11 | teacher | 12 |
0.3%
|
| 12 | health worker | 9 |
0.2%
|
| 13 | manager/administrator /clerical | 20 |
0.4%
|
| 14 | soldier/police/security | 8 |
0.2%
|
| 15 | business/trader | 126 |
2.6%
|
| 16 | student | 294 |
6.1%
|
| 17 | child,helping with domestic and farm work | 837 |
17.5%
|
| 18 | child too young to work | 148 |
3.1%
|
| 19 | unemployed | 464 |
9.7%
|
| 20 | disabled and unable to work | 13 |
0.3%
|
| 21 | not in labor force due to old age | 26 |
0.5%
|
| 22 | other | 765 |
16%
|
| Sysmiss | 12539 |
Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.