South East Europe Trade Logistics Impact Evaluation 2014, Survey of Serbian Freight Forwarders
Serbia, 2014
Get Microdata
Reference ID
SRB_2014_TLIE-SFF_v01_M
Producer(s)
Alejandra Mendoza Alcantara, Ana Margarida Fernandes, Russell Hillberry
Metadata
Created on
Jun 16, 2016
Last modified
Jun 16, 2016
Page views
18121
Downloads
9624
- Data files
- ffsurvey_finaldata
If you do not use in-house clearance, why not? (e33)
Data file: ffsurvey_finaldata
Overview
Valid:
104
Type:
Discrete
Start:
1759
End:
1900
Width:
142
Range:
-
Format:
character
Questions and instructions
Literal question
If you or your Clients do not use in-house clearance, why not?
Categories
| Value | Category | Cases | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Because customs won't open a private warehouse for clearance | 1 |
1%
|
|
| Because of complicated administration for getting the licence | 1 |
1%
|
|
| Because of complicated procedure for obtaining the licence for in-house clearance | 1 |
1%
|
|
| Because of products that require fast clearance and are not stored for being perishable | 1 |
1%
|
|
| Because of the law which is not clear regarding when it is allowed to do in-house clearance | 1 |
1%
|
|
| Because the computer system is still not operational, downtime in the computer system | 1 |
1%
|
|
| Big clients still haven't submitted an application | 1 |
1%
|
|
| Clients are not informed enough about in-house clearance | 1 |
1%
|
|
| Clients are not interested in that | 1 |
1%
|
|
| Clients are satisfied now | 1 |
1%
|
|
| Clients can do that, not forwarders | 1 |
1%
|
|
| Clients don't want this, they don't want to be responsible for everything | 1 |
1%
|
|
| Customs zone and customs service need to be established | 1 |
1%
|
|
| DK | 3 |
2.9%
|
|
| Due to technical possibilities, not trained enough customs officers | 1 |
1%
|
|
| Enterprises are still not able to do this, they have to have more extensive turnover. | 1 |
1%
|
|
| Forwarders don't meet the legal requirements for in-house clearance | 1 |
1%
|
|
| I don't have adequate conditions | 1 |
1%
|
|
| I don't know why they are not using it, it's a relatively new term | 1 |
1%
|
|
| I don't know, I don't think they have qualified and trained staff for that | 1 |
1%
|
|
| It doesn't exist | 2 |
1.9%
|
|
| It is not applicable to our business operations | 1 |
1%
|
|
| It is not economically justified to get that permission | 1 |
1%
|
|
| It is not introduced here | 1 |
1%
|
|
| It is not widespread enough | 1 |
1%
|
|
| It is still not widely applied | 1 |
1%
|
|
| It's a privilege of the big ones, it's a problem to get bank guarantees | 1 |
1%
|
|
| It's not much of a relief, we have no need for it | 1 |
1%
|
|
| Maybe they are not aware of it or it has no advantages over standard clearance | 1 |
1%
|
|
| My clients can't do that | 1 |
1%
|
|
| My enterprise doesn't do in-house clearance | 1 |
1%
|
|
| Natural persons don't use it, it's not allowed | 1 |
1%
|
|
| No one has asked for approval yet | 1 |
1%
|
|
| No, we are a small enterprise | 1 |
1%
|
|
| None of the clients asked for it | 1 |
1%
|
|
| Not big enough enterprises | 1 |
1%
|
|
| Only big companies do that | 1 |
1%
|
|
| Only huge enterprises have it, we are small | 1 |
1%
|
|
| Our clients don't have the conditions for that | 1 |
1%
|
|
| Our clients have small shipments | 1 |
1%
|
|
| Our clients still don't have the licence of customs administration | 1 |
1%
|
|
| Shipments are small and they don't require in-house clearance | 1 |
1%
|
|
| The customs system is such that only some forwarders can do in-house clearance | 1 |
1%
|
|
| The procedure is still not settled | 1 |
1%
|
|
| The procedure of obtaining a license for in-house clearance is too serious and small enterprises can't obtain it | 1 |
1%
|
|
| Their clients are not that strong, this is not allowed easily | 1 |
1%
|
|
| There are no basic conditions for in-house clearance | 1 |
1%
|
|
| There are no conditions | 1 |
1%
|
|
| There are no conditions available for that type of clearance | 1 |
1%
|
|
| There are no required conditions | 1 |
1%
|
|
| There is no completed program for representatives | 1 |
1%
|
|
| There is no sufficient and necessary information | 1 |
1%
|
|
| These are small enterprises | 1 |
1%
|
|
| They are in the process of obtaining one client | 1 |
1%
|
|
| They are not allowed | 1 |
1%
|
|
| They are not informed and educated enough | 1 |
1%
|
|
| They are not informed enough about in-house clearance | 1 |
1%
|
|
| They are not used to using in-house clearance | 1 |
1%
|
|
| They are not using it | 1 |
1%
|
|
| They are still not familiar with in-house clearance | 1 |
1%
|
|
| They are too small to have in-house clearance | 1 |
1%
|
|
| They can't do it, it doesn't suit them | 1 |
1%
|
|
| They can't meet the conditions for in-house clearance | 1 |
1%
|
|
| They don't have an authorized customs officer. They are not a big importer so they don't meet the conditions (quota) to do in-house clearance. | 1 |
1%
|
|
| They don't have big clients | 1 |
1%
|
|
| They don't have big work volume that requires in-house clearance, their work is dispersed | 1 |
1%
|
|
| They don't have some service to do it for them | 1 |
1%
|
|
| They don't have sufficient number of shipments to do in-house clearance | 1 |
1%
|
|
| They don't have sufficient work volume | 1 |
1%
|
|
| They don't have that much goods, it's easier for them this way | 1 |
1%
|
|
| They don't have the conditions for in-house clearance | 1 |
1%
|
|
| They don't meet the conditions | 2 |
1.9%
|
|
| They don't meet the conditions of various clearance approaches. | 1 |
1%
|
|
| They don't need it | 1 |
1%
|
|
| They don't use it because it's easier for clients, they have no obligations... | 1 |
1%
|
|
| They don't want to deal with it | 1 |
1%
|
|
| They don't want to open their warehouses, it costs more than classical clearance | 1 |
1%
|
|
| They finish things more quickly in customs offices | 1 |
1%
|
|
| They have no need for it | 1 |
1%
|
|
| They have to have agentry licence, it's an extra expenditure | 1 |
1%
|
|
| They haven't submitted an application for in-house clearance | 1 |
1%
|
|
| They probably don't have the licence for in-house clearance | 1 |
1%
|
|
| They still don't have the right staff and software, so we are intermediary customs officers. | 1 |
1%
|
|
| They still haven't submitted an application for granting | 1 |
1%
|
|
| This is not approved by the customs administration | 1 |
1%
|
|
| This was introduced relatively recently, it requires licences, training, education | 1 |
1%
|
|
| Vole spin &co | 1 |
1%
|
|
| We are not familiar enough with this procedure | 1 |
1%
|
|
| We don't have mass shipments | 1 |
1%
|
|
| We don't have such clients | 2 |
1.9%
|
|
| We don't have the conditions to do that | 1 |
1%
|
|
| We don't have truck, but air shipments and they have to enter customs | 1 |
1%
|
|
| We don't meet the conditions, there need to be at least 50 clearances a day, we still don't have that many. | 1 |
1%
|
|
| We have to have a customs officer because we have cumulative shipments | 1 |
1%
|
|
| We have to have the logistics for that, we generally have small clients | 1 |
1%
|
|
| We haven't informed them about that, they are not informed. Only big forwarders use in-house clearance. | 1 |
1%
|
|
| We re not allowed, we are not that big, only big companies are doing this | 1 |
1%
|
|
| We still have small turnover, but we are planning to start next year. We have to have 50 clearances a month. | 1 |
1%
|
|
| We were not informed | 1 |
1%
|
Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.