TJK_2018_HRBFIE-FEL_v01_M
Health Results Based Financing Impact Evaluation 2018
Health Facility Endline Survey
Name | Country code |
---|---|
Tajikistan | TJK |
Impact Evaluation Survey
The Health Results Innovation Trust Fund (HRITF) launched in 2007. It supports results-based financing (RBF) approaches in the health sector to improve maternal and child health around the world. The HRITF is supported by the Governments of Norway through Norad and the United Kingdom through the Department for International Development (DFID). It is administered by The World Bank.
As of September 2016, the total contributions to the trust fund were US$477.6 million equivalent from Norway and the United Kingdom. To date, HRITF has committed US$385.6 million for 35 PBF programs linked to US$2.0 billion in financing from IDA-the World Bank's fund for the poorest. In addition to the RBF programs, the trust fund also finances the evaluation of these programs and other supporting activities. Funded by the HRITF, the Tajikistan Health Results Based Financing Impact Evaluation Endline Survey was conducted in 2018.
The endline (follow-up) survey took place three years after project implementation, which launched in 2015. A baseline survey was conducted 2014-2015. The endline survey is largely based on the HRITF instruments that were modified to the Tajik and project context.
To learn more, please visit the RBF Health website (https://www.rbfhealth.org).
Sample survey data [ssd]
Health centers,
Health workers,
Patients (adults & children)
Patient household
The scope of the Tajikistan Health Results Based Financing Impact Evaluation 2018 - Health Facility Endline Survey includes:
Health Facilities: Assessment of key aspects of facility functioning and structural aspects of quality of care such as - facility staffing; infrastructure and equipment; availability of drugs, consumables and supplies; supervision; record keeping and reporting to Health Management Information System; Service volumes
Health Workers: Roles, responsibilities and characteristics of the interviewed health worker; staff satisfaction and motivation, technical knowledge on maternal child health, and non-communicable diseases.
Patient-Provider Interactions: assessment of adherence to protocols in terms of IMCI and hypertension management.
Patient Exit Interviews: patients' perceived quality of care and satisfaction with the care given; socio-economic background, and the general health of the patient.
Main Household Questionnaire: socio-demographic characteristics, income, transfers, assets, housing, consumption of food and other items, migration of household members in and out of the country, mortality, utilization of health care, and blood pressure measurements for all adults over 18 years.
Women of Reproductive Age: general health status, pregnancy history, reproductive health, utilization of family planning methods, antenatal care, deliveries, postnatal care, vaccination of children under 5 years, and anthropometric measures of the children under 5 years.
Adults Over 40: general health status, health-related behaviors (e.g., physical activity, smoking, and alcohol consumption), health care seeking, high cholesterol, and other health conditions.
Three districts in the Sughd region and four districts in the Khatlon region were selected to implement the program. All Rural Health Centers in these seven districts are covered by the program. Nine additional districts (two in Sughd and seven in Khatlon) were selected as control districts. The selection of the control districts was guided by geographical proximity to treatment districts and similarity in terms of number of health facilities and doctors per capita. The districts were also selected such that the number of RHCs in treatment and control groups in each region would be similar.
Name | Affiliation |
---|---|
Gil Shapira | The World Bank - DECHD |
Damien de Walque | The World Bank - DECHD |
Name | Affiliation | Role |
---|---|---|
Tashrik Ahmed | Consultant | Field coordinator/research assistant |
Huihui Wang | The World Bank - GHN03 | |
Aneesa Arur | The World Bank - GHN02 | |
Jeanette Walldorf | Consultant |
Name |
---|
Health Results Innovation Trust Fund |
Name | Affiliation |
---|---|
Mahbuba Mstafaevna | Tajikistan Ministry of Health |
Fatima Gaibova | Tajikistan Ministry of Health |
Saodat Mirsaburova | Tajikistan Ministry of Health |
Wezi Msisha | The World Bank |
Ha Ngyuyen | The World Bank |
Kate Mandeville | The World Bank |
Mutriba Latypova | The World Bank |
Sabrina Qandenova | The World Bank |
Sarvinoz Barfieva | The World Bank |
Rouselle Lavado | The World Bank |
The major features of the sampling procedure include the following steps (they are discussed in more detail in a copy of the study's report located in "External Resources"):
Health Facilities:
Households:
Health Facilities:
Of 216 RHCs selected for the impact evaluation, 210 were evaluated at both baseline and follow-up. Six RHCs evaluated at baseline were ineligible for selection at follow-up due to closure or re-registration (either upgraded to a district health center or downgraded to health house). These six RHCs and their respective health house and household enumeration areas were replaced before the start of the follow-up survey. A total of 151 health houses were assessed at baseline, and 150 at follow-up. Eleven health houses were close or re-registered as RHCs. Our analyses treat RHCs and health houses as panel data, where it is assumed the observed facility is measured at both time points. Therefore, both the original units which have been replaced and the replacement are excluded in the subsequent difference-in-difference and cross-sectional analyses.
Health Workers:
A total of 1,574 health workers were surveyed in the RHCs included in the analysis sample, 767 at baseline and 807 at follow-up. The average number of health workers fell slightly below the 4 per RHC target, as more remote RHCs did not have four staff members available. In health houses, the two staff per HH was achieved in the baseline sample but narrowly missed in the follow-up survey. Health workers who worked in both the rural health center and health house were treated as RHC employees.
Households:
A total of 10,599 households were surveyed across 230 villages in 210 RHC catchment areas, 4910 at baseline and 5689 during follow-up covering 83,803 household members. Within the two targeted populations, 7048 women 15-49 years of age with a pregnancy in the past three years, and 17,583 adults 40 years or older were surveyed.
The Tajikistan Health Results Based Financing Impact Evaluation 2018 - Health Facility Endline Survey includes the following 7 questionnaires.
Facility-Based Surveys:
Household Survey:
5. Main household questionnaire
6. Women of reproductive age interview questionnaire
7. Adults over 40 years old questionnaire
Start | End | Cycle |
---|---|---|
2018-03-01 | 2018-07-31 | Follow-up |
Name | Affiliation |
---|---|
Zerkalo Analytics | Consultant |
The Committee on Ethics of the Ministry of Health and Social Protection reviewed the study design, fieldwork protocols and the instruments and granted ethical clearance for the study on October 24th, 2014. The Health Results Innovation Trust Fund survey instruments were adapted to the Tajik context. Additional modules were developed to correspond to the project focus on NCD outcomes on top of the MCH outcomes. Representatives of the Ministry of Health, Zerkalo, and members of the World Bank team conducted several field visits to health facilities to inform the adaptation of the survey instruments. The instruments were pretested three times between August and October 2014, before the training of the field team. A local firm, Zerkalo, was selected through an international competitive procurement process to manage all aspects of the data collection. Figure 6.2., in the attached report located in “external resources”, summarizes and illustrates how data collection was organized for the baseline and endline surveys. Identical instruments were used with few adjustments.
Name | Affiliation |
---|---|
Gil Shapira | The World Bank |
Name | Affiliation | |
---|---|---|
Gil Shapira | The World Bank | gshapira@worldbank.org |
Is signing of a confidentiality declaration required? | Confidentiality declaration text |
---|---|
yes | Users of the data agree to keep confidential all data contained in these datasets and to make no attempt to identify, trace or contact any individual whose data is included in these datasets. |
Use of the dataset must be acknowledged using a citation which would include:
Example,
Shapira, Gil., Damien de Walque. 2018. Tajikistan Health Results Based Financing Impact Evaluation 2018, Health Facility Endline Survey (HRBFIE-FEL 2018). Ref. TJK_2018_HRBFIE-FEL_01_M. The World Bank. Dataset downloaded from [URL] on [date].
The user of the data acknowledges that the original collector of the data, the authorized distributor of the data, and the relevant funding agency bear no responsibility for use of the data or for interpretations or inferences based upon such uses.
DDI_TJK_2018_HRBFIE-FEL_v01_M_WB
Name | Affiliation | Role |
---|---|---|
Development Economics Data Group | The World Bank | Documentation of the study |
2019-09-12
Version 01 (September 2019).
This site uses cookies to optimize functionality and give you the best possible experience. If you continue to navigate this website beyond this page, cookies will be placed on your browser. To learn more about cookies, click here.