Impact, Maintenance, and Sustainability of Irrigation Impact Evaluation Survey 2015-2018, Baseline, First, Second, Third Follow-up

Rwanda, 2015 - 2018

Get Microdata

Reference ID

RWA_2015-2018_LWHIE_v01_M

DOI

https://doi.org/10.48529/899t-y944

Producer(s)

Florence Kondylis, Maria Jones, John Loeser, Jeremy Magruder

Collection(s)

Impact Evaluation Surveys Development Impact Evaluation (DIME)

Metadata

Documentation in PDF DDI/XML JSON

Created on

Feb 27, 2020

Last modified

Mar 03, 2020

Page views

973439

Downloads

2418

For which of the following reasons was [${plot_17c_d2}] not irrigated during S (pi2_02_1)

Data file: fup2_season_17c.dta

Overview

Valid: 311

Invalid: 1324

Minimum: -77

Maximum: 7

Type: Discrete

Decimal: 0

Start: 8334

End: 8336

Width: 3

Range: -77 - 7

Format: Numeric

Questions and instructions

Categories

Value	Category
-77	Other
1	No Need (Adequate Rainfall)
2	No Plastic Hose
3	No Water In Primary Canal
4	Limited Knowledge
5	Damaged Infrastructure
6	No irrigation infrastructure close to this plot
7	Conflicts with members of the WUG
8	Had not paid the water fees

Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.

Back to Catalog