SVK_2019_ES_v01_M
Enterprise Survey 2019
Name | Country code |
---|---|
Slovak Republic | SVK |
Enterprise Survey [en/oth]
An Enterprise Survey (ES) is a firm-level survey of a representative sample of an economy's private sector. Firm-level surveys have been conducted since 1998 by different units within the World Bank. Since 2005-06, most data collection efforts have been centralized within the Enterprise Analysis Unit (FPDEA). The Enterprise Surveys are conducted across all geographic regions and cover small, medium, and large companies. Data are used to create indicators that benchmark the quality of the business and investment climate across countries.
The ES currently cover over 195,000 firms in 152 countries, of which 144 have been surveyed following the standard methodology. This allows for better comparisons across countries and across time. Data are used to create statistically significant business environment indicators that are comparable across countries. The ES are also used to build a panel of enterprise data that will make it possible to track changes in the business environment over time and allow, for example, impact assessments of reforms.
Sample survey data [ssd]
The primary sampling unit of the study is an establishment. An establishment is a physical location where business is carried out and where industrial operations take place or services are provided. A firm may be composed of one or more establishments. For example, a brewery may have several bottling plants and several establishments for distribution. For the purposes of this survey an establishment must make its own financial decisions and have its own financial statements separate from those of the firm. An establishment must also have its own management and control over its payroll.
Version 01. Edited, anonymous dataset for public distribution.
the Slovak Republic 2018 Enterprise Survey covered the following topics:
National
Regions covered are selected based on the number of establishments, contribution to employment, and value added. In most cases these regions are metropolitan areas and reflect the largest centers of economic activity in a country.
The whole population, or universe of the study, is the non-agricultural economy. It comprises: all manufacturing sectors according to the group classification of ISIC Revision 3.1: (group D), construction sector (group F), services sector (groups G and H), and transport, storage, and communications sector (group I). Note that this definition excludes the following sectors: financial intermediation (group J), real estate and renting activities (group K, except sub-sector 72, IT, which was added to the population under study), and all public or utilities-sectors.
Name |
---|
The World Bank Group |
The European Bank for Reconstruction and Development |
The European Investment Bank |
Name |
---|
The World Bank Group |
The European Bank for Reconstruction and Development |
The European Investment Bank |
The sample for 2019 Slovakia ES was selected using stratified random sampling, following the methodology explained in the Sampling Note.
Three levels of stratification were used in this country: industry, establishment size, and region. The original sample design with specific information of the industries and regions chosen is described in "Slovakia 2019 ES Implementation Report" Appendix C.
Industry stratification was done as follows: two manufacturing industries (food, and other manufacturing) and two services industries (retail and other services). Food (NACE 2 which maps to ISIC Rev. 4.0 codes 10 and 11), Other Manufacturing (ISIC codes 12-14, 15-28, 29-33), Retail (ISIC code 47) and Other Services (ISIC codes 41, 42, 43, 45, 46, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 55, 56, 61, 62, 79).
For the Slovakia ES, size stratification was defined as follows: small (5 to 19 employees), medium (20 to 99 employees), and large (100 or more employees).
Regional stratification for the Slovakia ES was done across four regions: Bratislava Region, Western Slovakia (Západné Slovensko), Central Slovakia (Stredné Slovensko) and Eastern Slovakia (Východné Slovensko).
Survey non-response must be differentiated from item non-response. The former refers to refusals to participate in the survey altogether whereas the latter refers to the refusals to answer some specific questions. Enterprise Surveys suffer from both problems and different strategies were used to address these issues.
Item non-response was addressed by two strategies:
a- For sensitive questions that may generate negative reactions from the respondent, such as corruption or tax evasion, enumerators were instructed to collect the refusal to respond (-8) as a different option from don’t know (-9).
b- Establishments with incomplete information were re-contacted in order to complete this information, whenever necessary. For this survey there were zero non-responses for the sales variable, d2. Please, note that for this specific question, refusals were not separately identified from “Don’t know” responses.
The number of interviews per contacted establishments was 0.05. This number is the result of two factors: explicit refusals to participate in the survey, as reflected by the rate of rejection (which includes rejections of the screener and the main survey) and the quality of the sample frame, as represented by the presence of ineligible units.
The share of rejections per contact was 53.1%.
Since the sampling design was stratified and employed differential sampling, individual observations should be properly weighted when making inferences about the population. Under stratified random sampling, unweighted estimates are biased unless sample sizes are proportional to the size of each stratum. With stratification the probability of selection of each unit is, in general, not the same. Consequently, individual observations must be weighted by the inverse of their probability of selection (probability weights or pw in Stata.)
Special care was given to the correct computation of the weights. It was imperative to accurately adjust the totals within each region/industry/size stratum to account for the presence of ineligible units (the firm discontinued businesses or was unattainable, education or government establishments, no reply after having called in different days of the week and in different business hours, no tone in the phone line, answering machine, fax line6, wrong address or moved away and could not get the new references). The information required for the adjustment was collected in the first stage of the implementation: the screening process. Using this information, each stratum cell of the universe was scaled down by the observed proportion of ineligible units within the cell. Once an accurate estimate of the universe cell (projections) was available, weights were computed using the number of completed interviews.
Due to non-response rates, some stratification cells were collapsed for the purposes of weighting, to preserve the representativeness of the sample. The following cells have been transformed: (i) medium and large firms are treated as one cell in Bratislava Region for Food
Two questionnaires used to collect the data: (1) Manufacturing, and (2) Services.
The questionnaires have common questions (core module) and respectfully additional manufacturing- and services-specific questions. The eligible manufacturing industries have been surveyed using the Manufacturing questionnaire (includes the core module, plus manufacturing specific questions). Retail firms have been interviewed using the Services questionnaire (includes the core module plus retail specific questions) and the residual eligible services have been covered using the Services questionnaire (includes the core module). Each variation of the questionnaire is identified by the index variable, a0.
Start | End |
---|---|
2018-12 | 2020-03 |
Name |
---|
Kantar Public |
Kantar Slovakia |
The surveys were implemented following a 2-stage procedure. Typically, first a screener questionnaire is applied over the phone to determine eligibility and to make appointments. Then a face-to-face interview takes place with the Manager/Owner/Director of each establishment. However, sometimes the phone numbers were unavailable in the sample frame, and thus the enumerators applied the screeners in person.
For the Slovakia 2019 ES, the fieldwork ended due to the COVID-19 outbreak and sample exhaustion.
Name |
---|
Joshua Seth Wimpey |
Name | Affiliation | |
---|---|---|
Enterprise Analysis Unit | The World Bank Group | enterprisesurveys@worldbank.org |
Is signing of a confidentiality declaration required? |
---|
Yes |
The use of this dataset must be acknowledged using a citation which would include:
Example:
The World Bank, The European Bank for Reconstruction and Development, and European Investment Bank. Slovak Republic Enterprise Survey (ES) 2018, Ref. SVK_2018_ES_v01_M. Dataset downloaded from [URL] on [date].
The user of the data acknowledges that the original collector of the data, the authorized distributor of the data, and the relevant funding agency bear no responsibility for use of the data or for interpretations or inferences based upon such uses.
Name | Affiliation | |
---|---|---|
Enterprise Analysis Unit | The World Bank Group | enterprisesurveys@worldbank.org |
DDI_SVK_2019_ES_v01_M
Name | Affiliation | Role |
---|---|---|
Development Economics Data Group | The World Bank Group | Documentation of the DDI |
2020-07-16
Version 1 (July 2020)
2020-07-16
This site uses cookies to optimize functionality and give you the best possible experience. If you continue to navigate this website beyond this page, cookies will be placed on your browser. To learn more about cookies, click here.