Rural Capacity Building Project Impact Evaluation 2012, Endline

Ethiopia, 2012

Get Microdata

Reference ID

ETH_2012_RCBPIE-EL_v01_M

DOI

https://doi.org/10.48529/3pgt-c070

Producer(s)

Julia Vaillant, Niklas Buehren

Collection(s)

Impact Evaluation Surveys Fragility, Conflict and Violence

Metadata

Documentation in PDF DDI/XML JSON

Created on

Feb 11, 2021

Last modified

Feb 11, 2021

Page views

39353

Downloads

871

d61. why haven't you used a technology you saw at a frg/freg activity or field d (d61_f_h)

Data file: RCBP _FA_TRAINING_D24_D65.dta

Overview

Valid: 14

Invalid: 1379

Minimum: 2

Maximum: 5

Type: Discrete

Decimal: 0

Start: 118

End: 118

Width: 1

Range: 2 - 5

Format: Numeric

Questions and instructions

Question pretext

FRGs (Farmer Research Group) or FREGs (Farmer Research Extension Group)

Categories

Value	Category	Cases
1	wasn�t appropriate technically	0	0%
2	didn�t make sense economically	3	21.4%
3	wasn�t socially appropriate	0	0%
4	unaffordable	6	42.9%
5	unavailable	5	35.7%
6	other	0	0%
7	i haven�t seen new technologies	0	0%
8	the climate is not conducive	0	0%
Sysmiss		1379

Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.

Back to Catalog