High-Frequency Monitoring of COVID-19 Impacts 2020-2022
Rounds 1-7
Indonesia, 2020 - 2022
Get Microdata
Reference ID
IDN_2020_HFMCI_v05_M
Producer(s)
World Bank
Collection(s)
Metadata
Created on
Apr 29, 2021
Last modified
Feb 23, 2023
Page views
28732
Downloads
3240
Identification
Survey ID Number
IDN_2020_HFMCI_v05_M
Title
High-Frequency Monitoring of COVID-19 Impacts 2020-2022
Subtitle
Rounds 1-7
Country/Economy
| Name | Country code |
|---|---|
| Indonesia | IDN |
Study type
Socio-Economic/Monitoring Survey [hh/sems]
Abstract
The World Bank has launched a quick-deploying high-frequency phone-monitoring survey of households to generate near real-time insights on the socio-economic impact of COVID-19 on households which hence to be used to support evidence-based response to the crisis. At a moment when all conventional modes of data collection have had to be suspended, a phone-based rapid data collection/tracking tool can generate large payoffs by helping identify affected populations across the vast archipelago as the contagion spreads, identify with a high degree of granularity the mechanisms of socio-economic impact, identify gaps in public policy response as the Government responds, generating insight that could be useful in scaling up or redirecting resources as necessary as the affected population copes and eventually regains economic footing.
Unit of Analysis
Household-level; Individual-level: household primary breadwinners, respondent, student
Version
Version Description
Version 05: Edited, anonymous dataset for public distribution. Updated with the survey's second sample for individual employment for Rounds 5, 6, and 7.
Version Date
1676523600
Version Notes
Version 05 updates:
The main update is the addition of the survey's second sample for individual employment:
- A new file on the technical note explaining the second sample;
- New microdata files of the second respondent of employment PS_04_2.dta and its corresponding module in the questionnaires of Rounds 5, 6, and 7;
- A new microdata file on individuals selected as the second sample and their corresponding survey weights.
We also updated the study description.
The main update is the addition of the survey's second sample for individual employment:
- A new file on the technical note explaining the second sample;
- New microdata files of the second respondent of employment PS_04_2.dta and its corresponding module in the questionnaires of Rounds 5, 6, and 7;
- A new microdata file on individuals selected as the second sample and their corresponding survey weights.
We also updated the study description.
Scope
Notes
The Indonesia COVID-19 High-Frequency survey covered the following topics:
a) Knowledge and behavior (Rounds 1, 3);
b) Employment and income loss (Rounds 1, 3, 5, 6, 7);
c) Food security (Rounds 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7);
d) Access to health services (Rounds 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7);
e) Digital transactions (Rounds 2, 4);
f) Education (Rounds 2, 4, 7);
g) Coping mechanisms (Rounds 2, 4, 6, 7);
h) Concerns/Subjective Welfare (Rounds 2, 4, 5);
i) Social safety-nets (Rounds 1, 3, 5, 6); and
Household roster (Rounds 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7;
Full updates only in R1 and R4)
a) Knowledge and behavior (Rounds 1, 3);
b) Employment and income loss (Rounds 1, 3, 5, 6, 7);
c) Food security (Rounds 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7);
d) Access to health services (Rounds 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7);
e) Digital transactions (Rounds 2, 4);
f) Education (Rounds 2, 4, 7);
g) Coping mechanisms (Rounds 2, 4, 6, 7);
h) Concerns/Subjective Welfare (Rounds 2, 4, 5);
i) Social safety-nets (Rounds 1, 3, 5, 6); and
Household roster (Rounds 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7;
Full updates only in R1 and R4)
Producers and sponsors
Primary investigators
| Name |
|---|
| World Bank |
Funding Agency/Sponsor
| Name | Abbreviation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| The Australian Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade | DFAT | Sponsor |
| Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation | BMGF | Sponsor |
| Global Financing Facility | GFF | Sponsor |
Sampling
Sampling Procedure
The sampling process was conducted in three stages. With districts being the primary sampling unit (PSU), during the first stage, districts were selected on the basis of probability proportional to size (PPS), with systematic sampling in each stratum. According to this process, the probability of a district being selected was proportional to its estimated number of households, based on data derived from the social National Household Survey of Socio-economic (SUSENAS) 2019. Prior to this selection process, districts were sorted by provincial code.
During the second stage, villages, the secondary sampling unit (SSU), were systematically selected in each district, with the probability of a village being selected proportional to the estimated number of households, based on data derived from the Village Potential Census (PODES) 2018. Prior to this selection process, villages were sorted by sub-district code.
During the third stage, a number of households in each selected village was selected systematically. Prior to this selection process, all households were sorted by implicit stratification (according to the gender and educational level of the heads of households). If the primary selected households could not be contacted or refused to participate in the survey, these households were replaced by others from the same area as these non-responsive households, with the household heads of these replacements having the same gender and level of education as the non-responsive households. This was done in order to ensure the representativeness of sampled households, as outlined in the initial design.
During the second stage, villages, the secondary sampling unit (SSU), were systematically selected in each district, with the probability of a village being selected proportional to the estimated number of households, based on data derived from the Village Potential Census (PODES) 2018. Prior to this selection process, villages were sorted by sub-district code.
During the third stage, a number of households in each selected village was selected systematically. Prior to this selection process, all households were sorted by implicit stratification (according to the gender and educational level of the heads of households). If the primary selected households could not be contacted or refused to participate in the survey, these households were replaced by others from the same area as these non-responsive households, with the household heads of these replacements having the same gender and level of education as the non-responsive households. This was done in order to ensure the representativeness of sampled households, as outlined in the initial design.
Response Rate
The HiFy survey was initially designed as a 5-round panel survey. By the end of the fifth round, it was expected that around 3,000 panel households would have participated in all rounds of the survey. Based on the previous experiences of other phone-based, panel surveys conducted in Indonesia, it was expected that the response rates would be in the range of 60 percent to 80 percent. However, experiences with similar surveys conducted elsewhere in the world suggests that the response rate for a phone-based survey, particularly a phone-based panel survey, is generally below 50 percent. In addition, in the case of the current survey, information regarding selected households’ phone numbers was collected two years prior to its implementation, with a potential risk that the targeted respondents might not be contactable through their provided numbers (inactive or changed). Based on these considerations, the response rate for the first survey is estimated to reach 60 percent, with the response rates for the following rounds expected to stand at 80 percent. Based on these assumptions, the first round of the survey was delivered to 8500 selected households, of which it was expected that 5,100 households would respond. In the first round, 4,338 households, or 85 percent of the target of 5,100 households, responded. However, due to the response rates in the following rounds being higher than expected, the total number of successfully sampled households successfully interviewed in Round 2 were 4,119 (95% of Round 1 samples); Round 3 at 4,067 (94%); Round 4 at 3,953 (91%); Round 5 at 3,686 (85%); Round 6 at 3,471 (80%) and Round 7 at 3,435 (79%). The number of balanced panel households at Round 3 was 3,981 (92%); 3,794 (87%) at Round 4, 3,601 (83%) at Round 5; 3,320 (77%) at Round 6; and 3,116 (72%) at Round 7.
Weighting
The HiFy survey was initially designed as a 5-round panel survey. By end of the fifth round, it is expected that the survey can maintain around 3,000 panel households. Based on the experience of phone-based, panel survey conducted previously in other study in Indonesia, the response rates were expected to be around 60 percent to 80 percent. However, learned from other similar surveys globally, response rates of phone-based survey, moreover phone-based panel survey, are generally below 50 percent. Meanwhile, in the case of the HiFy, information on some of households’ phone numbers was from about 2 years prior the survey with a potential risk that the targeted respondents might not be contactable through that provided numbers (already inactive or the targeted respondents had changed their phone numbers). With these considerations, the estimated response rate of the first survey was set at 60 percent, while the response rates of the following rounds were expected to be 80 percent. Having these assumptions and target, the first round of the survey was expected to target 5,100 households, with 8,500 households in the list. The actual sample of households in the first round was 4,338 households, or 85 percent of the 5,100 target households. However, the response rates in the following rounds are higher than expected, making the sampled households successfully interviewed in Round 2 were 4,119 (95% of Round 1 samples), and in Rounds 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 were 4,067 (94%), 3,953 (91%), 3,686 (85%), 3,471 (80%), and 3,435 (79%) respectively. The number of balanced panel households up to Rounds 3, 4, 5, 6 are 3,981 (92%), 3,794 (87%), 3,601 (83%), 3,320 (77%), and 3,116 (72%) respectively.
Data Collection
Dates of Data Collection
| Start | End | Cycle |
|---|---|---|
| 2020-05-01 | 2020-05-17 | Round 1 |
| 2020-05-26 | 2020-06-05 | Round 2 |
| 2020-07-20 | 2020-08-02 | Round 3 |
| 2020-11-03 | 2020-11-15 | Round 4 |
| 2021-03-11 | 2021-03-24 | Round 5 |
| 2021-10-18 | 2021-10-31 | Round 6 |
| 2022-04-07 | 2022-04-20 | Round 7 |
Data Collection Mode
Computer Assisted Telephone Interview [cati]
Data Collection Notes
Data collection was conducted by the contracted survey firm, SurveyMETER.
Questionnaires
Questionnaires
The questionnaire in English is provided for download under the Documentation section.
Access policy
Contacts
| Name | Affiliation | |
|---|---|---|
| Rabia Ali | World Bank | rali1@worldbank.org |
| Ade Febriady | World Bank | afebriady@worldbank.org |
| Ririn Purnamasari | World Bank | rpurnamasari@worldbank.org |
Confidentiality
Citation requirements
Use of the dataset must be acknowledged using a citation which would include:
- the Identification of the Primary Investigator
- the title of the survey (including country, acronym and year of implementation)
- the survey reference number
- the source and date of download
Example:
World Bank. Indonesia - High-Frequency Monitoring of COVID-19 Impacts 2020-2022, Rounds 1-7 (HIFY 2020-2022). Ref: IDN_2020_HFMCI_v05_M. Downloaded from [uri] on [date].
- the Identification of the Primary Investigator
- the title of the survey (including country, acronym and year of implementation)
- the survey reference number
- the source and date of download
Example:
World Bank. Indonesia - High-Frequency Monitoring of COVID-19 Impacts 2020-2022, Rounds 1-7 (HIFY 2020-2022). Ref: IDN_2020_HFMCI_v05_M. Downloaded from [uri] on [date].
Access authority
| Name | Affiliation |
|---|---|
| Rabia Ali | World Bank |
| Ade Febriady | World Bank |
| Ririn Purnamasari | World Bank |
Disclaimer and copyrights
Disclaimer
The user of the data acknowledges that the original collector of the data, the authorized distributor of the data, and the relevant funding agency bear no responsibility for use of the data or for interpretations or inferences based upon such uses.
Metadata production
DDI Document ID
DDI_IDN_2020_HFMCI_v05_M_WB
Producers
| Name | Abbreviation | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|---|
| Development Data Group | DECDG | World Bank | Documentation of the study |
Date of Metadata Production
2023-02-23
DDI Document version
Version 05 (2023-02-23)