Khayelitsha Integrated Family Survey 2002-2005

South Africa, 2002 - 2005

Get Microdata

Reference ID

ZAF_2002-2005_KIFS_v01_M

Producer(s)

Professor Anne Case

Collection(s)

DataFirst , University of Cape Town, South Africa

Metadata

Documentation in PDF DDI/XML JSON

Created on

Jan 27, 2012

Last modified

May 01, 2014

Page views

86385

Downloads

1402

comment6: Comments: Part 6 (comment6)

Data file: khay02030405_ch_200906

Overview

Valid: 20

Type: Discrete

Start: 1635

End: 1878

Width: 244

Range: -

Format: character

Questions and instructions

Categories

Value	Cases
*IT LOOKS LIKE 0263-04 IS 0263-05'S TWIN.*	1	5%
.	1	5%
and DTP vaccine were given to child concurrently; that on 29/05/00 the second dose of these three vaccines were, again, administered at the same time; and that the third dose for all three of these vaccines was given on 26/06/00. This is what	1	5%
der other. Both measles vaccines are recorded as measles in this data set. Immunization records were left untouched here.	1	5%
dited and made to be 105.50cm, which is more likely to have been the actual measurement.	1	5%
ds to the 18-month dose of measles but this is not entirely clear, so we leave data here untouched.) 4.It looks like the interviewer had trouble transposing vaccine boosters from the child's original health card to the immunization chart we ha	1	5%
ected here. 5.It looks like the interviewer had trouble transposing vaccine boosters from the child's original health card to the immunization chart we have in our interview guide. Here we interpret that child was administered the 18-month boo	1	5%
ion chart for BCG is very odd. Interviewer records that a dose of BCG was given to child at about 6 weeks, 10 weeks and 14 weeks, a schedule that we not at all expect for this vaccine. Data here were left untouched. 4c).Immunization schedule	1	5%
munization chart itself, under the polio, DTP and measles vaccines. As such we do not include these duplicates in this dataset.	1	5%
o and DTP vaccine were said to be administered to child on 05/01/02, more than a month before the child was actually born. Again, this looks like a mistake. Since all doses of the DTP, HepB, and polio vaccines (except for the one at birth) we	1	5%
o vaccine are not in chronological order. I have not changed the order here and left the sequence as written in the original module.	1	5%
ry odd, but since there does not seem to be any obvious or clear mistake to be corrected, original data were left untouched, except for specific instances described above.	1	5%
sn't indicated in the chart.	1	5%
t about 6 months, another at about 3 years and 3 months, another at about 9 months, and a last one at roughly 3 years and 2 months. These were left untouched.	1	5%
t is recorded as being administered before the child was even born) and instead of 03/05/00 the date is actually 03/08/00, making it compatible with other dates also listed in the module. Note that these immunizations are not listed in chronolo	1	5%
tes listed under polio (31/05/00) actually take place before the child was born and that there is a typo in the year. We changed the year to 2001, which is more consistent with this child's immunization records. 5. Three doses of measles were	1	5%
ther vaccines recorded in the module.) 3.Interviewer notes that two other vaccines were given to the child, but the name of the vaccine is missing.	1	5%
these vaccines were administered, again together, on 11/06/02; and the third dose was given for all three vaccines was given on 22/07/2002. This is reflected here. 3.Interviewer lists that 2 other vaccines were administered and though date	1	5%
third box for HepB is crossed out with a dash, indicating a third dose was not given for this vaccine.	1	5%
under Polio0 instead.	1	5%

Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.

Back to Catalog