Education Outcomes National Panel Survey (NPS) 2002-2008
Mozambique, 2002 - 2009
Get Microdata
Reference ID
MOZ_2002_NPS_v01_M
Producer(s)
The World Bank, Instituto Nacional de Estatistica Moçambique
Collection(s)
Created on
Apr 05, 2012
Last modified
Sep 26, 2013
Page views
114176
Downloads
27184
- Data files
-
assets index
and consumption
agregate - psia08_iaf_indata_labeled
- psia08_iaf_hhdata
- sec_a1
- sec_b0
- sec_b1
- sec_b2
- sec_c0
- sec_c1
- sec_c2
- sec_d0a
- sec_d0b
- sec_d0c
- sec_d1
- sec_d2
- sec_d3
- sec_d3a1
- sec_d3a2
- sec_d3b
- sec_d3c1
- sec_d3c2
- sec_e1
- sec_f1
- sec_ga
- sec_gb
- sec_gc
- sec_gd
- sec_h1
- sec_i1
- sec_j1
- hhweights
- inv_prob_weights_ind
culturas anuais básicas e de rendimento (d3a01)
Data file: sec_d3a1
Overview
Valid:
4696
Invalid:
0
Type:
Discrete
Start:
16
End:
30
Width:
15
Range:
-
Format:
character
Questions and instructions
Categories
| Value | Category | Cases | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ABOBORA | 220 |
4.7%
|
|
| ALFACE | 100 |
2.1%
|
|
| ALGODÃO | 40 |
0.9%
|
|
| ALHO | 30 |
0.6%
|
|
| AMENDOIM GRANDE | 264 |
5.6%
|
|
| AMENDOIM PEQUEN | 179 |
3.8%
|
|
| ARROZ | 192 |
4.1%
|
|
| BATATA DOCE ALA | 102 |
2.2%
|
|
| BATATA DOCE BRA | 103 |
2.2%
|
|
| BATATA RENO | 11 |
0.2%
|
|
| BERINGELA | 1 |
0%
|
|
| CANA DOCE | 52 |
1.1%
|
|
| CEBOLA | 116 |
2.5%
|
|
| CENOURA | 15 |
0.3%
|
|
| COUVE | 153 |
3.3%
|
|
| ERVILHA | 39 |
0.8%
|
|
| FEIJÃO BOER | 117 |
2.5%
|
|
| FEIJÃO JUGO | 115 |
2.4%
|
|
| FEIJÃO MANTEIGA | 78 |
1.7%
|
|
| FEIJÃO NHEMBA | 463 |
9.9%
|
|
| FEIJÃO VERDE | 16 |
0.3%
|
|
| GENGIBRE | 3 |
0.1%
|
|
| GERGELIM | 75 |
1.6%
|
|
| GIRASSOL | 5 |
0.1%
|
|
| MANDIOCA | 644 |
13.7%
|
|
| MAPIRA | 270 |
5.7%
|
|
| MELANCIA | 15 |
0.3%
|
|
| MEXOEIRA | 33 |
0.7%
|
|
| MILHO | 899 |
19.1%
|
|
| PEPINO | 55 |
1.2%
|
|
| PIMENTA | 5 |
0.1%
|
|
| PIRI-PIRI | 9 |
0.2%
|
|
| QUIABO | 35 |
0.7%
|
|
| REPOLHO | 21 |
0.4%
|
|
| SOJA | 11 |
0.2%
|
|
| TABACO | 24 |
0.5%
|
|
| TOMATE | 186 |
4%
|
Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.