VNM_2012_STEP-HH_v02_M
STEP Skills Measurement Household Survey 2012 (Wave 1)
Name | Country code |
---|---|
Viet Nam | VNM |
Other Household Survey
The STEP project consists of Household Surveys collection and Employer Surveys collection.
These surveys are part of the STEP Household Surveys collection.
So far, two waves have been implemented in 12 countries. The third wave is under preparation.
The first wave started in September 2011 and was completed in December 2013. Wave 1 countries are: Bolivia, Colombia, Sri Lanka, Lao PDR, Vietnam, the Yunnan Province in China, Ghana, and Ukraine.
The second wave started in August 2012 and was completed in June 2014. Wave 2 countries are: Armenia, Georgia, Macedonia, and Kenya.
Type | Identifier |
---|---|
DOI | https://doi.org/10.48529/n0w4-j136 |
Sample survey data [ssd]
The units of analysis are the individual respondents and households. A household roster is undertaken at the start of the survey and the individual respondent is randomly selected among all household members aged 15 to 64 included. The random selection process was designed by the STEP team and compliance with the procedure is carefully monitored during fieldwork.
Version 02, edited anonymous datasets for public distribution.
Version 01 was published in June 2014, but now is replaced with v02.
The difference between v02 and v01 datasets:
2014-05-30
The scope of the study includes:
The survey covers the urban area of two largest cities of Vietnam, Ha Noi and HCMCT.
The STEP target population is the population aged 15 to 64 included, living in urban areas, as defined by each country's statistical office. In Vietnam, the target population comprised all people from 15-64 years old living in urban areas in Ha Noi and Ho Chi Minh City (HCM).
The reasons for selection of these two cities include :
(i) They are two biggest cities of Vietnam, so they would have all urban characteristics needed for STEP study, and
(ii) It is less costly to conduct STEP survey in these to cities, compared to all urban areas of Vietnam, given limitation of survey budget.
The following are excluded from the sample:
Name |
---|
World Bank |
Name | Affiliation | Role |
---|---|---|
Alexandria Valerio | World Bank | STEP Co-Task Team Leader, Education Global Practice |
Maria Laura Sanchez Puerta | World Bank | STEP Co-Task Team Leader, Social Protection and Labor Global Practice |
Tania Rajadel | World Bank Consultant Project Coordinator | Technical assistance in project management, data collection, data processing and data analysis |
Gaelle Pierre | World Bank Consultant Senior Labor Economist | Technical assistance in project management, questionnaire design, and data analysis |
Valerie Evans | World Bank Consultant Survey Consultant | Technical assistance in questionnaire design, sampling methodology, and data collection |
Sebastian Monroy Taborda | World Bank Consultant Research Analyst | Technical assistance in data processing and data analysis |
Name | Role |
---|---|
Multi-Donor Trust Fund Labor Markets, Job Creation and Economic Growth | Funding |
Bank Netherlands Partnership Program | Funding |
Name | Role |
---|---|
Educational Testing Services | Designed the Reading Literacy Assessment Module and conducted the preliminary analysis of the reading literacy data, including generating plausible values for the Extended Assessment |
The sample frame includes the list of urban EAs and the count of households for each EA. Changes of the EAs list and household list would impact on coverage of sample frame. In a recent review of Ha Noi, there were only 3 EAs either new or destroyed from 140 randomly selected Eas (2%). GSO would increase the coverage of sample frame (>95% as standard) by updating the household list of the selected Eas before selecting households for STEP.
A detailed description of the sample design is available in section 4 of the NSDPR provided with the metadata.
On completion of the household listing operation, GSO will deliver to the World Bank a copy of the lists, and an Excel spreadsheet with the total number of households listed in each of the 227 visited PSUs.
The response rate for Vietnam (urban) was 62%. (See STEP Methodology Note Table 4).
While the Vietnam Phase 2 three-stage stratified cluster design greatly enhanced the operational feasibility of data collection, it resulted in differential probabilities of selection for the selected persons. Consequently, each selected person in the survey does not necessarily represent the same number of persons in the target population. To account for differential probabilities of selection due to the nature of the design and to ensure accurate survey estimates, STEP requires a sampling weight for each person that participated in the survey.
In general, the objectives of the STEP weighting are to construct a set of survey weights to:
The general weighting procedure for the Vietnam STEP survey required the following tasks.
The STEP survey instruments include:
(i) a Background Questionnaire developed by the WB STEP team
(ii) a Reading Literacy Assessment developed by Educational Testing Services (ETS).
All countries adapted and translated both instruments following the STEP Technical Standards: 2 independent translators adapted and translated the Background Questionnaire and Reading Literacy Assessment, while reconciliation was carried out by a third translator.
The WB STEP team and ETS collaborated closely with the survey firms during the process and reviewed the adaptation and translation to Vietnamese (using a back translation).
Start | End | Cycle |
---|---|---|
2012-05 | 2012-06 | Fieldwork |
Name |
---|
Vietnam General Statistical Office |
Number of Team leaders
The STEP main study will have 8 team leaders; each team leader will be responsible for a survey team with 4 interviewers.
Team leader Responsibilities
A team leader is directly responsible for all activities of a survey team at local. They have to contact with local authority to ensure all the necessary conditions (local guiders) are ready for activities of the survey team at households. Also team leader has to ensure every day activities of interviewers. GSO will ensure there is a rigorous supervision process and mechanisms (including spot-checks) in place to ascertain an appropriate implementation of the survey (verifying adherence to the sample selected), correct implementation of tests and adherence to established interview protocols. They have to participate in interviews to guarantee the proper implementation of survey procedures as well as the quality of questionnaires; deal with problems in replacement of the household sample or respondent collaboration; The team leaders along with regional supervisors will participate in the interviews of interviewers or contact with households/respondents by phone to check/re-interview to deal with survey problems, especially non-response or completed sample structure.
A field supervisor will revisit each household in the following situations:
a. A household refuses or does not begin the interview because of special circumstances (result codes 1 or 2).
b. A household stops before finishing the Household Module, Module 1.
c. A household where the selected individual is not able to begin the questionnaire - for refusal, for special circumstance, absence, other reasons.
d. A household where the individual stops without finishing the individual modules 2-7.
e. A household where the individual stops during the Reading Exercises Module and refuses to attempt all the items.
If any interviewer's work is found to be suspect, the interviewer will be dismissed and all of the interviews done by that interviewer will be redone in their entirety. Team leaders will report all problems (through weekly report or by phone) to the Regional Supervisors or Centre STEP GSO
Number of Regional Supervisors
The STEP main study will have at least 4 Regional Supervisors who will be supervised by a Central GSO team (Project Manager, Field Manager, Survey Methodologist and Data Manager).
Regional Supervisor Responsibilities
They will be responsible with GSO for supervising survey teams at regions (Ha Noi and HCMCT). They will participate the interviews of interviewers to help them to improve data quality; check the filled questionnaires to find the errors and take over before delivering to GSO; contact with households/respondents through phone to re-interview; and weekly reports with Centre GSO team all technical and fieldwork-organization issues as well as solutions for the problems. Through these activities, the regional supervisors will find out problems and solutions in non-response as well as completed sample structure. In particular, the supervisors will carry out a verification of each interviewer's visits by a revisit to 5% of the households in each interviewer assignment and a follow-up of a further 5% of households by telephone in each interviewer assignment. The households involved in the verification process will be randomly selected within each PSU. If any interviewer's work is found to be suspect, the interviewer will be dismissed and all of the interviews done by that interviewer will be redone in their entirety.
Progress Reporting: Each week during the survey period, GSO will submit to the WB Team a data file containing all the entered survey data to date.
Detailed country-by-country information is provided in each country's National Survey Design Planning Report (NSDPR). It described the project management structure, fieldwork teams and reporting processes.
Each component of the STEP Survey was carried out by a personal visit using a Paper And Pencil Interview (PAPI) method.
As the STEP program requires all surveys to be implemented in a standardized way, particular attention was provided to implementation processes
(i) Each participating country (survey firm) wrote up a National Survey Design Planning Report (NSDPR) detailing how it intended to implement the STEP survey while complying with the STEP Technical Standards. The NSDPRs were submitted to the WB STEP team for approval.
(ii) The WB STEP team and Eductaional Testing Services (ETS) provided 2 workshops to all survey firms. The first was a 2-day workshop provided via video conference and aimed at presenting the STEP Technical Standards. The second workshop was organized over 2 full weeks at the WB's Headquarters and consisted in a training course to project managers from each survey firm on the survey instruments - Background Questionnaire and Reading Literacy Assessment - as well as on implementation and data management procedures.
(iii) Based on the STEP Technical Standards, the survey firms adapted and translated the STEP survey instruments, the Interviewer Manual, and all training materials.
(iv) Once the instruments had been adapted and translated, survey firms carried out a pre-test, usually including 20-30 interviews. Findings from the pre-test were discussed with the WB STEP team and ETS to finalize the adaptation and translation of the STEP survey instruments. In Vietnam the survey was implemented in Vietnamese.
(v) Each survey firm provided a 2-week training course to its enumerators, using training materials developed by the WB STEP team (after translation and adaptation). The WB STEP team's Survey Consultant helped organize the training and was present in the country for the first few days at least of the training. In addition, the WB STEP team in Washington DC provided just-in-time technical assistance, answering questions sent by the survey firm during the training. The training included in-field mock interviews in addition to in-class courses. At the end of the training, survey firms only retained enumerators having demonstrated a good understanding of the instruments.
(vi) As per STEP Technical Standards, data collection started within a few days of the end of the enumerators' training course.The composition of each country's fieldwork teams is described in the NSDPR, as well as reporting procedures and quality control processes.Weekly reports were sent to the WB STEP team, which provided just-in-time technical assistance during fieldwork to answer questions or concerns. Regular calls or VCs were also held between survey firms and the WB STEP team to discuss progress. Matters discussed usually involved questions on how to deal with specific situations, strategies to reduce non-response, the activation of reserve households, and general pace of progress. Non-response rates were high in Bolivia and Colombia, in part due to difficult access to appartment buildings and gated communities, although survey firms worked hard to gain local community leaders' support. In a few instances - all documented in the weighting documentation - a couple of EAs were replaced due to security concerns or because an EA had been completely altered (e.g. construction site, dwellings converted into a large shopping center).
(vii) Interviews lasted between 120 and 150 minutes, depending on respondents' reading proficiency.
STEP Data Management Process
- ETS runs data checks on the Reading Literacy Assessment data.
- Comments and questions are sent back to the survey firm.
Detailed information data processing in STEP surveys is provided in the 'Guidelines for STEP Data Entry Programs' document provided as an external resource. The template do-file used by the STEP team to check the raw background questionnaire data is provided as an external resource.
A weighting documentation was prepared for each participating country and provides some information on sampling errors.
All country weighting documentations are provided as an external resource.
Public use files, accessible to all
STEP Skills Measurement Program, Household Survey 2014, The World Bank. Ref: VNM_2012_STEP-HH_v02_M. Dataset downloaded from [URL] on [date]
The user of the data acknowledges that the original collector of the data, the authorized distributor of the data, and the relevant funding agency bear no responsibility for use of the data or for interpretations or inferences based upon such uses.
(c) STEP 2014, The World Bank
DDI_VNM_2012_STEP-HH_v02_M_WB
Name | Affiliation | Role |
---|---|---|
Development Economics Data Group | The World Bank | Documentation of the DDI |
2016-03-03
Version 02 (March 2016)
Changes in v02 of study documentation compared to v01 published in June 2014
Version 01 (June 2014)
This site uses cookies to optimize functionality and give you the best possible experience. If you continue to navigate this website beyond this page, cookies will be placed on your browser. To learn more about cookies, click here.