International Labor Migration 2010-2012, Baseline, Benchmark and Endline Surveys
Philippines, 2010 - 2012
Get Microdata
Reference ID
PHL_2010-2012_ILM_v01_M
Producer(s)
David McKenzie
Collection(s)
Metadata
Created on
Oct 02, 2018
Last modified
Nov 16, 2018
Page views
99056
Downloads
2262
- Data files
- attritiondata
- facilmig_public
- FUP2013
- roster2013fup
D2_COUNTRY_OF_WORK_1 (base_d2_country_of_work_1)
Data file: facilmig_public
Overview
Valid:
462
Invalid:
5516
Minimum:
1
Maximum:
112
Type:
Discrete
Decimal:
0
Start:
1358
End:
1360
Width:
3
Range:
1 - 112
Format:
Numeric
Questions and instructions
Literal question
Section 4. Remittances and Work Abroad
B. Country
B. Country
Categories
| Value | Category | Cases | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | -1 | 1 |
0.2%
|
| 2 | -2 | 9 |
1.9%
|
| 3 | 88888 | 1 |
0.2%
|
| 4 | ABU DHABE | 1 |
0.2%
|
| 5 | ABU DHABI | 2 |
0.4%
|
| 6 | ABUDABI | 1 |
0.2%
|
| 7 | AFRICA | 3 |
0.6%
|
| 8 | AL KHUBAR | 1 |
0.2%
|
| 9 | ALABAMA USA | 1 |
0.2%
|
| 10 | ALASKA | 2 |
0.4%
|
| 11 | ALGERIA | 3 |
0.6%
|
| 12 | AMERICA | 6 |
1.3%
|
| 13 | ARGENTINA | 1 |
0.2%
|
| 14 | ASIA | 1 |
0.2%
|
| 15 | ASIAN COUNTRIES | 1 |
0.2%
|
| 16 | AUSTRALIA | 12 |
2.6%
|
| 17 | AUSTRALIAN CITIZEN | 1 |
0.2%
|
| 18 | AUSTRIA | 1 |
0.2%
|
| 19 | BAHRAIN | 5 |
1.1%
|
| 20 | BELGIUM | 2 |
0.4%
|
| 21 | BHARAIN | 1 |
0.2%
|
| 22 | BRAZIL | 2 |
0.4%
|
| 23 | BRUNEI | 6 |
1.3%
|
| 24 | BRUNIE | 2 |
0.4%
|
| 25 | CALIFONIA USA | 1 |
0.2%
|
| 26 | CALIFORNIA | 6 |
1.3%
|
| 27 | CALIFORNIA USA | 1 |
0.2%
|
| 28 | CANADA | 27 |
5.8%
|
| 29 | CHICACAGO | 1 |
0.2%
|
| 30 | CHINA | 1 |
0.2%
|
| 31 | CYPRUS | 1 |
0.2%
|
| 32 | DIFF COUNTRY | 1 |
0.2%
|
| 33 | DUABI | 1 |
0.2%
|
| 34 | DUBAI | 36 |
7.8%
|
| 35 | DUBAI, UAE | 1 |
0.2%
|
| 36 | DUBIA | 1 |
0.2%
|
| 37 | ENGLAND | 1 |
0.2%
|
| 38 | EUROPE | 5 |
1.1%
|
| 39 | FLORIDA | 4 |
0.9%
|
| 40 | FLORIDA MIAMI | 1 |
0.2%
|
| 41 | GERMANY | 6 |
1.3%
|
| 42 | GREECE | 5 |
1.1%
|
| 43 | GUAM | 2 |
0.4%
|
| 44 | HAWAII | 1 |
0.2%
|
| 45 | HONGKONG | 13 |
2.8%
|
| 46 | INTERNATIONAL | 3 |
0.6%
|
| 47 | IRELAND | 2 |
0.4%
|
| 48 | ISRAEL | 2 |
0.4%
|
| 49 | ITALY | 6 |
1.3%
|
| 50 | JAPAN | 20 |
4.3%
|
| 51 | JEDA | 1 |
0.2%
|
| 52 | JEDAH | 1 |
0.2%
|
| 53 | JEDDA | 0 |
0%
|
| 54 | JEDDAH | 8 |
1.7%
|
| 55 | JEDDAH KSA | 1 |
0.2%
|
| 56 | JORDAN | 1 |
0.2%
|
| 57 | KOREA | 2 |
0.4%
|
| 58 | KUWAIT | 13 |
2.8%
|
| 59 | KWAIT | 1 |
0.2%
|
| 60 | LAS VEGAS | 1 |
0.2%
|
| 61 | LEBANON | 6 |
1.3%
|
| 62 | LIBYA | 3 |
0.6%
|
| 63 | LONDON | 5 |
1.1%
|
| 64 | LOS ANGELES | 1 |
0.2%
|
| 65 | MACAU | 3 |
0.6%
|
| 66 | MALAYSIA | 2 |
0.4%
|
| 67 | MARYLAND USA | 1 |
0.2%
|
| 68 | MASACHUSETTE USA | 1 |
0.2%
|
| 69 | NETHERLANDS | 1 |
0.2%
|
| 70 | NEW JERSEY | 4 |
0.9%
|
| 71 | NEW YORK | 2 |
0.4%
|
| 72 | NO DEFINITE COUNTRY | 1 |
0.2%
|
| 73 | NO DIFINITE COUNTRY | 1 |
0.2%
|
| 74 | NO INDIFINITE COUNTRY | 1 |
0.2%
|
| 75 | NORTH CAROLINA | 1 |
0.2%
|
| 76 | NORWAY | 1 |
0.2%
|
| 77 | OMAN | 3 |
0.6%
|
| 78 | PARIS | 1 |
0.2%
|
| 79 | QATAR | 21 |
4.5%
|
| 80 | QUATAR | 1 |
0.2%
|
| 81 | RHIAD | 1 |
0.2%
|
| 82 | RIJADH | 1 |
0.2%
|
| 83 | RIYADH | 12 |
2.6%
|
| 84 | RUSSIA | 0 |
0%
|
| 85 | SAIPAN | 1 |
0.2%
|
| 86 | SAN PABLO CA | 3 |
0.6%
|
| 87 | SANTA CLARA CALIFORNIA | 1 |
0.2%
|
| 88 | SAUDI | 16 |
3.5%
|
| 89 | SAUDI ARABIA | 44 |
9.5%
|
| 90 | SAUDI JEDAH | 2 |
0.4%
|
| 91 | SINGAPORE | 12 |
2.6%
|
| 92 | SOUTH KOREA | 2 |
0.4%
|
| 93 | SPAIN | 1 |
0.2%
|
| 94 | SWITZERLAND | 1 |
0.2%
|
| 95 | TAIWAN | 7 |
1.5%
|
| 96 | TENESSE | 1 |
0.2%
|
| 97 | TEXAS | 1 |
0.2%
|
| 98 | THAILAND | 2 |
0.4%
|
| 99 | TURKEY | 1 |
0.2%
|
| 100 | U S A | 1 |
0.2%
|
| 101 | UAE | 10 |
2.2%
|
| 102 | UAE UNITED ARAB EMIRATES | 1 |
0.2%
|
| 103 | UEA | 1 |
0.2%
|
| 104 | UK | 1 |
0.2%
|
| 105 | UK UNITED KINGDOM | 1 |
0.2%
|
| 106 | UNITED ARAB EMIRATES | 2 |
0.4%
|
| 107 | UNITED STATES | 1 |
0.2%
|
| 108 | US | 1 |
0.2%
|
| 109 | US ARIZONA | 1 |
0.2%
|
| 110 | USA | 27 |
5.8%
|
| 111 | USA CALIFORNIA | 1 |
0.2%
|
| 112 | VIETNAM | 1 |
0.2%
|
| Sysmiss | 5516 |
Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.