Afrobarometer Survey 2010, Round 4.5

Zimbabwe, 2010

Reference ID

ZWE_2010_AFB-R4.5_v01_M

Producer(s)

Ghana Centre for Democratic Development (CDD), Institute for Justice and Reconciliation in South Africa (IJR), Institute for Empirical Research in Political Economy (IREEP), Institute for Development Studies (IDS), Michigan State University (MSU), University of Cape Town (UCT, South Africa)

Collection(s)

Afrobarometer Fragility, Conflict and Violence

Metadata

DDI/XML JSON

Study website Interactive tools

Created on

May 04, 2021

Last modified

May 05, 2021

Page views

18379

Downloads

Q10. Power sharing as an alternative to elections (Q10)

Data file: zim_r4-5_data.sav

Overview

Valid: 1192

Invalid: -

Minimum: 0

Maximum: 9

Mean: 2.35989932885906

Standard deviation: 1.73824544270248

Type: Discrete

Decimal: 0

Start: 150

End: 152

Width: 3

Range: 0 - 9

Format: Numeric

Questions and instructions

Literal question

Which of the following three statements about power sharing comes closest to your view?
Statement 1:Power sharing is a good alternative to competitive elections, which rarely work well.
Statement 2:Power sharing is a second-best solution, to be used only when elections fail.
Statement 3:Power sharing is a bad alternative that should never replace competitive elections.

Categories

Value	Category	Cases
-1	Missing	0	0%
0	None of the above	15	1.3%
1	Agree with statement 1	294	24.7%
2	Agree with statement 2	508	42.6%
3	Agree with statement 3	312	26.2%
9	Don't Know	63	5.3%
998	Refused	0	0%

Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.

Back to Catalog