High Frequency Phone Survey 2020-2021
Gambia, 2020 - 2021
Get Microdata
Reference ID
GMB_2020_HFPS_v01_M
Producer(s)
The World Bank, Gambia Bureau of Statistics (GBoS)
Collection(s)
Metadata
Created on
Dec 13, 2021
Last modified
Dec 20, 2021
Page views
150716
Downloads
6675
- Data files
- hhroster_wave1.dta
- mktroster.dta
- GAMBIA_COVID_19_weighted_cleaned_wave1.dta
- income_loss.dta
- s13shockroster.dta
- s13q5.dta
- hhroster_wave2_annonymized.dta
- mktroster_wave2.dta
- GAMBIA_COVID_19Wave2.dta
- income_loss_wave2.dta
- s3service_wave2.dta
- hhroster_wave3_anonymised.dta
- mktroster_wave3.dta
- GAMBIA_COVID_19Wave3_cleaned_anonymised.dta
- income_loss_wave3.dta
- s3service_wave3.dta
- hhroster_wave4_anonymised.dta
- GAMBIA_COVID_19Wave4_anonymised.dta
-
informal
employment_wave4.dta - hhroster_wave5.dta
- GAMBIA_COVID_19Wave5_anonymised_weighted.dta
- hhroster_wave6.dta
- GAMBIA_COVID_19Wave6_anonymised_weighted.dta
- hhroster_wave7.dta
- GAMBIA_COVID_19Wave7_anonymised_weighted.dta
- hhroster_wave8.dta
- mktroster__wave8.dta
- GAMBIA_COVID_19Wave8_weighted.dta
- income_loss_wave8.dta
- s3service__wave8.dta
- hhroster_anonymised__wave9.dta
- GAMBIA_COVID_19Wave9_weighted.dta
- income_loss__wave9.dta
- hhroster_anonymised_wave10.dta
- GAMBIA_COVID_19Wave10_weighted.dta
- income_loss_wave10.dta
INTERVIEWER: IN WHICH LANGUAGE DID YOU MAINLY CONDUCT THE INTERVIEW? (which_language)
Data file: GAMBIA_COVID_19Wave8_weighted.dta
Overview
Valid:
1092
Invalid:
16
Minimum:
1
Maximum:
5
Type:
Discrete
Decimal:
0
Start:
1204
End:
1205
Width:
2
Range:
1 - 5
Format:
Numeric
Questions and instructions
Categories
| Value | Category | Cases | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ENGLISH | 58 |
5.3%
|
| 2 | MANDINKA | 449 |
41.1%
|
| 3 | WOLLOF | 369 |
33.8%
|
| 4 | FULA | 190 |
17.4%
|
| 5 | JOLA | 26 |
2.4%
|
| 6 | SARAHULE | 0 |
0%
|
| 7 | SERERE | 0 |
0%
|
| 8 | MANJAGO | 0 |
0%
|
| 9 | CREOLE/ AKU MARABOUT | 0 |
0%
|
| 10 | BAMBARA | 0 |
0%
|
| Sysmiss | 16 |
Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.