The World Bank Working for a World Free of Poverty Microdata Library
  • Data Catalog
  • About
  • Collections
  • Citations
  • Terms of use
  • Login
    Login
    Home / Central Data Catalog / MICRODATA_RG / PER_2025_GAITS_V01_M
microdata_rg

Not Faster, but Better: Generative AI and Teacher Skill in Peru 2025
Baseline and Endline Surveys

Peru, 2025
Get Microdata
Reference ID
PER_2025_GAITS_v01_M
Producer(s)
Carla Z. Glave, Carolina Lopez, Ezequiel Molina, Román Andrés Zárate
Collection(s)
Development Research Microdata
Metadata
Documentation in PDF DDI/XML JSON
Created on
Jul 20, 2026
Last modified
Jul 20, 2026
Page views
763
Downloads
3
  • Study Description
  • Data Description
  • Documentation
  • Get Microdata
  • Identification
  • Version
  • Scope
  • Coverage
  • Producers and sponsors
  • Sampling
  • Survey instrument
  • Data collection
  • Data processing
  • Data Access
  • Disclaimer and copyrights
  • Contacts
  • Metadata production
  • Identification

    Survey ID number

    PER_2025_GAITS_v01_M

    Title

    Not Faster, but Better: Generative AI and Teacher Skill in Peru 2025

    Subtitle

    Baseline and Endline Surveys

    Abbreviation or Acronym

    GAITS 2025

    Country/Economy
    Name Country code
    Peru PER
    Series Information

    This dataset accompanies the paper "Not Faster, but Better: Generative AI and Teacher Skill in Peru" (Glave, Lopez, Molina & Zarate). The data come from a randomized controlled trial conducted in 390 public primary schools in Metropolitan Lima, Peru, during the 2025 school year. The study evaluated a program providing sixth-grade teachers with a one-day training on generative AI, a Microsoft Copilot license, and weekly WhatsApp follow-up; the message sender (education authority vs. peer teacher) and content (general vs. teaching-at-the-right-level) were cross-randomized. The dataset is a teacher-level file combining administrative rosters, training attendance, a baseline survey, weekly Copilot usage records, and an endline survey with blind-graded prompt-quality measures for 1,269 teachers. Pre-registered as AEARCTR-0016336; IRB protocol #48010 (University of Toronto).

    Abstract
    Generative AI is being deployed across the public sectors of developing countries on the premise that it makes workers faster. We test this in a randomized trial with 1,269 sixth-grade teachers across 390 public schools in Lima, Peru. A low-cost program—a one-day training, an AI license, and eight months of light-touch follow-up—raised adoption sharply yet saved teachers no time on any of their core tasks, with precisely estimated nulls throughout. The gains lay elsewhere: treated teachers wrote markedly better prompts, including on a rubric designed independently of the training, and were sharper at catching weak AI outputs. These gains were largest for older teachers, who began furthest behind, narrowing rather than widening skill gaps. Taken together, the results indicate that AI training primarily develops the skills needed to generate and evaluate high-quality AI outputs, rather than reducing the time teachers spend on their work.
    Kind of Data

    Sample survey data [ssd]

    Unit of Analysis

    Teachers

    Version

    Version Date

    2026-07-03

    Scope

    Notes

    The dataset covers: program take-up (training attendance, Copilot license activation and weekly usage); teachers' use of AI for professional and personal tasks; time allocation across seven core teaching activities; blind-graded quality of AI prompts (training-based and general rubrics); teachers' ability to evaluate AI-generated output (prompt scenarios); beliefs about AI, equity, and willingness to pay; a discrete choice experiment on hypothetical AI-use scenarios; and baseline teacher and school characteristics.

    Coverage

    Geographic Coverage

    School (institución educativa); randomization stratified by UGEL (local education district)

    Universe

    Sixth-grade primary school teachers in public schools in Metropolitan Lima, Peru, during the 2025 school year. The sample comprises all 390 public schools in Metropolitan Lima that offer sixth grade of primary education (196 treatment, 194 control) and their 1,269 sixth-grade teachers.

    Producers and sponsors

    Primary investigators
    Name Affiliation
    Carla Z. Glave University of Wisconsin–Madison
    Carolina Lopez Development Research Group, World Bank
    Ezequiel Molina World Bank
    Román Andrés Zárate University of Toronto
    Funding Agency/Sponsor
    Name Role
    Human Capital Project (World Bank) Primary Founder
    Microsoft AI Economy Institute

    Sampling

    Sampling Procedure

    The sample is a census of the 390 public schools in Metropolitan Lima offering sixth grade of primary education. Treatment was assigned in two stages. First, eligibility was randomized at the school-network level: 84 of 143 administrative networks were selected, re-running the randomization 1,000 times and keeping the allocation that maximized the minimum p-value across baseline school characteristics. Second, treatment was randomized at the school level within eligible networks, stratified by UGEL (local school district) and by whether baseline school math performance was above or below the median, using the same re-randomization procedure. Two components were cross-randomized within the treatment group: the sender of the follow-up messages (education authority vs. peer teacher) and their content (general support vs. teaching-at-the-right-level).

    Weighting

    No weights are used. All estimates are unweighted; regressions include randomization strata fixed effects.

    Survey instrument

    Questionnaires

    Baseline Teacher Survey (Spanish, Baseline); Endline Teacher Survey (Spanish, Endline)

    Data collection

    Dates of Data Collection
    Start End Cycle
    2025-04-10 2025-05-11 Baseline post training
    2025-04-01 2025-12-11 Copilot usage records
    2025-12-01 2025-12-31 Endline
    Mode of data collection
    • Internet [int]
    Data Collectors
    Name
    World Bank research team, in coordination with DRELM
    Data Collection Notes

    Survey data were collected through self-administered online questionnaires. The baseline survey was administered after the March 2025 training sessions through a form on DRELM's teacher platform. The endline survey was administered in Qualtrics, first during in-person sessions and subsequently distributed online to maximize response rates; the survey modality of each respondent (endline_online) is recorded in the dataset and controlled for in all survey-based analyses. In addition to survey data, the dataset incorporates administrative sources: school and teacher rosters from DRELM, attendance records from the March 2025 training sessions, and weekly Microsoft Copilot license usage reports . Open-ended prompt responses from the endline were blind-graded by evaluators using two rubrics; only the graded scores are included in the dataset.

    Data processing

    Data Editing

    Data from the five sources were merged at the teacher level. De-identification: direct identifiers (names, national IDs, e-mails, phone numbers), Qualtrics metadata (IP, geolocation, timestamps), open-text responses, granular geography, and school-level variables matchable to the public school census were removed; school, district and teacher identifiers were replaced with anonymous codes assigned with fixed random seeds. Missing covariates are flagged and imputed within the analysis code.

    Data Access

    Access authority
    Name Affiliation Email
    Carolina Lopez Development Research Group, World Bank carolina_lopez@worldbank.org
    Confidentiality
    Is signing of a confidentiality declaration required? Confidentiality declaration text
    yes The data were collected under IRB protocol #48010 approved by the University of Toronto Research Ethics Board. All participants provided informed consent. Data have been de-identified: names and direct identifiers have been removed. Respondents are adult public school teachers.
    Access conditions

    Access to this dataset requires signing a Data Use Agreement (DUA) with the authors. Users may not attempt to re-identify study participants, share the data with third parties, or use the data for purposes other than research. Publications using these data must acknowledge the original study and cite the accompanying paper.

    Citation requirements

    Glave, Carla Z., Carolina Lopez, Ezequiel Molina, and Román Andrés Zárate. "Not Faster, but Better: Generative AI and Teacher Skill in Peru." Working paper.

    Disclaimer and copyrights

    Disclaimer

    The user of the data acknowledges that the original collectors of the data, the authorized distributors of the data, and the relevant funding agencies bear no responsibility for use of the data or for interpretations or inferences based upon such uses. The findings, interpretations, and conclusions expressed in any work using this dataset are entirely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of the World Bank, its affiliated organizations, or the governments they represent.

    Copyright

    © World Bank

    Contacts

    Contacts
    Name Affiliation Email
    Carolina Lopez Development Research Group, World Bank carolina_lopez@worldbank.org

    Metadata production

    DDI Document ID

    DDI_PER_2025_GAITS_v01_M

    Producers
    Name Abbreviation Affiliation Role
    Development Data Group DECDG World Bank Group Documentation of the survey

    Metadata version

    DDI Document version

    Version 01 (July 2026)

    Back to Catalog
    The World Bank Working for a World Free of Poverty
    • IBRD IDA IFC MIGA ICSID

    © The World Bank Group, All Rights Reserved.

    This site uses cookies to optimize functionality and give you the best possible experience. If you continue to navigate this website beyond this page, cookies will be placed on your browser. To learn more about cookies, click here.