Vulnerable Groups Impact Evaluation Household Survey 2008, (TASAF II), Round 1

Tanzania, 2008

Get Microdata

Reference ID

TZA_2008_TASAF-II_v01_M_v01_A_PUF

DOI

https://doi.org/10.48529/qz63-r316

Producer(s)

Sarah Baird, Craig McIntosh, Berk Ozler

Collection(s)

Impact Evaluation Surveys Development Research Microdata The Strategic Impact Evaluation Fund (SIEF)

Metadata

Documentation in PDF DDI/XML JSON

Study website

Created on

May 03, 2012

Last modified

Sep 26, 2013

Page views

86915

Downloads

23423

Main reason of change in the nr of this livestock compared to 12 months ago? (T5DAQ4)

Data file: HHLivestock_public

Overview

Valid: 2668

Invalid: 14316

Type: Discrete

Decimal: 0

Start: 23

End: 24

Width: 2

Range: 1 - 99

Format: Numeric

Questions and instructions

Literal question

What was the main reason of change in the number of this livestock compared to 12 months ago?

Categories

Value	Category	Cases
1	Died	705	26.4%
2	Bought	368	13.8%
3	Gift from individual	68	2.5%
4	Given by development organizations	9	0.3%
5	Reproduction (Not necessary from own livestock)	597	22.4%
6	Sold	603	22.6%
7	Given away	30	1.1%
8	Stolen	45	1.7%
9	Eaten at home	240	9%
99	Other (Specify)	3	0.1%
Sysmiss		14316

Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.

Interviewer instructions

Note the meaning of 'died' in the response list. 'Died' should NOT be selected if the animals were deliberately
slaughtered for home consumption or sale of meat. It should only be used if the animals died unintentionally - e.g.
disease, accident, old age.

Back to Catalog