Monitoring of the Shelter Programme 2018
Ukraine, 2018 - 2019
Get Microdata
Reference ID
UKR_2018_MSP_v01_M
Producer(s)
UN Refugee Agency (UNHCR)
Collection(s)
Metadata
Created on
May 31, 2022
Last modified
Jun 01, 2022
Page views
1009
Downloads
51
Identification
Survey ID Number
UKR_2018_MSP_v01_M
Title
Monitoring of the Shelter Programme 2018
Country/Economy
| Name | Country code |
|---|---|
| Ukraine | UKR |
Study type
Socio-Economic/Monitoring Survey [hh/sems]
Abstract
The monitoring of 2018 shelter activities confirms the main findings of the 2017 campaign: the repair of houses damaged by conflict-related incidents is still highly appreciated by recipients (95% of respondents, compared to 97% in 2017) and is executed with good quality (99% of cases, compared to 100% in 2017).
In only 7 cases out of 464 (less than 2%), the repair works were deemed by the monitoring team as being not in accordance with the locally accepted standards and good construction practices (0 cases in 2017).
The 464 monitoring visits conducted in 2018 correspond also to more than three-quarters of the minimum sample suggested by the SOPs (602 visits, or 44% of the total number of repairs). Also, this is a significant improvement compared to 2017, when the monitoring teams managed to cover only one-third of the recommended sample. UNHCR was able to monitor a higher proportion of houses in 2018 as compared to the previous year for two main reasons. First, to address the chronic lack of vehicles to conduct field visits, teams made a concerted effort to plan field visits in advance for times when vehicles would be available. Second, teams used the Kobo format of the monitoring form consistently and correctly, which eliminated the extra step of data entry and made the monitoring process more efficient.
In only 7 cases out of 464 (less than 2%), the repair works were deemed by the monitoring team as being not in accordance with the locally accepted standards and good construction practices (0 cases in 2017).
The 464 monitoring visits conducted in 2018 correspond also to more than three-quarters of the minimum sample suggested by the SOPs (602 visits, or 44% of the total number of repairs). Also, this is a significant improvement compared to 2017, when the monitoring teams managed to cover only one-third of the recommended sample. UNHCR was able to monitor a higher proportion of houses in 2018 as compared to the previous year for two main reasons. First, to address the chronic lack of vehicles to conduct field visits, teams made a concerted effort to plan field visits in advance for times when vehicles would be available. Second, teams used the Kobo format of the monitoring form consistently and correctly, which eliminated the extra step of data entry and made the monitoring process more efficient.
Kind of Data
Sample survey data [ssd]
Unit of Analysis
Households
Version
Version Description
Edited, anonymous dataset for licensed distribution.
Version Date
2021-11-30
Scope
Notes
The study covered the following topics:
Geographical characteristics of repaired shelter; beneficiary's information and protection assessment; vulnerability criteria; safety; technical assessments of buildings; satisfaction with repairs; access to basic services.
Geographical characteristics of repaired shelter; beneficiary's information and protection assessment; vulnerability criteria; safety; technical assessments of buildings; satisfaction with repairs; access to basic services.
Topics
| Topic |
|---|
| Emergency Shelter and NFI |
| Community Services |
| Logistics |
| Peace Building/Conflict Prevention Sector |
| Housing, Land and Property |
| Legal Assistance/Protection |
| Shelter/Other Infrastructure |
| Domestic Needs/Household Support |
Coverage
Geographic Coverage
Mariupol, Sloviansk and Severodonetsk, and Donetsk and Luhansk
Universe
All 1374 repairs conducted by UNHCR between September 2018 and March 2019.
Producers and sponsors
Primary investigators
| Name | Affiliation |
|---|---|
| UN Refugee Agency (UNHCR) | UN |
Sampling
Sampling Procedure
The monitored sample covers repairs completed in the geographic areas of all five UNHCR offices in eastern Ukraine (Mariupol, Sloviansk and Sievierodonetsk in government-controlled areas [GCA]; Donetsk and Luhansk in non-government-controlled areas [NGCA]).
Nonrandom sample (purposive), selected to comply with 3 principles:
- to cover as many areas as possible to capture the different conditions in which house repairs are conducted, while giving priority to areas with difficult access and conditions
- to accord priority to problematic cases (in terms of technical or protection-related issues)
- to cover all types of repairs, but giving priority to interventions that have required high investments in terms of time and money (heavy repairs and reconstructions)
Nonrandom sample (purposive), selected to comply with 3 principles:
- to cover as many areas as possible to capture the different conditions in which house repairs are conducted, while giving priority to areas with difficult access and conditions
- to accord priority to problematic cases (in terms of technical or protection-related issues)
- to cover all types of repairs, but giving priority to interventions that have required high investments in terms of time and money (heavy repairs and reconstructions)
Data Collection
Dates of Data Collection
| Start | End |
|---|---|
| 2018-09-03 | 2019-03-31 |
Data Collection Mode
Computer Assisted Telephone Interview [cati]
Data Collection Notes
The monitoring visits took place between September 2018 and March 2019 and were performed by teams composed of at least two members, one from the shelter team and one from the Protection unit.
The collection of the information was based on the standard Kobo Shelter Monitoring Form (is provided in the Documentation tab), which has two main sections, one focused on technical aspects, the other on Protection.
All visits were conducted also in accordance with the recommendations included in the Shelter SOPs (see Annex 4 of the report) and the dedicated guidelines (see Annex 5 of the report).
The collection of the information was based on the standard Kobo Shelter Monitoring Form (is provided in the Documentation tab), which has two main sections, one focused on technical aspects, the other on Protection.
All visits were conducted also in accordance with the recommendations included in the Shelter SOPs (see Annex 4 of the report) and the dedicated guidelines (see Annex 5 of the report).
Data Collectors
| Name | Abbreviation | Affiliation |
|---|---|---|
| UN Refugee Agency | UNHCR | UN |
Questionnaires
Questionnaires
The survey questionnaire/ form consisted of the following sections:
- Survey details
- Location
- Beneficiary's info
- Technical assessment
- Quality assessment/ satisfaction level
- Selection and vulnerability criteria
- Safety
- Access to basic services
- Sustainability of the intervention
- Other comments/ important information
- Survey details
- Location
- Beneficiary's info
- Technical assessment
- Quality assessment/ satisfaction level
- Selection and vulnerability criteria
- Safety
- Access to basic services
- Sustainability of the intervention
- Other comments/ important information
Access policy
Contacts
| Name | Affiliation | URL | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Curation Team | UN Refugee Agency | microdata@unhcr.org | Link |
Citation requirements
UNHCR (2021). Ukraine: Shelter Monitoring 2017. Accessed from https://microdata.unhcr.org
Access authority
| Name | Affiliation | URL | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Curation Team | UN Refugee Agency | microdata@unhcr.org | Link |
Metadata production
DDI Document ID
DDI_UKR_2018_MSP_v01_M
Producers
| Name | Abbreviation | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|---|
| UN Refugee Agency | UNHCR | UN | Documentation of the study |
| Development Economics Data Group | DECDG | The World Bank | Metadata adapted for Microdata Library |
Date of Metadata Production
2021-11
DDI Document version
Version 01 (May 2022): This metadata was downloaded from the UNHCR Microdata Library catalog (https://microdata.unhcr.org/index.php). The following two metadata fields were edited - Document and Survey ID.