Data file | Cases | Variables |
---|---|---|
f00
List of countries and regions
|
207 | 5 |
f110
Access to Electricity Network (% of population)
|
207 | 29 |
f121
Households Reporting Access to Electricity (% of households)
* Percent distribution of households that have electricity, according to urban-rural residence. * The data was placed in the latest year when the survey covered 2 calendar years (e.g. Bangladesh 1993/94). |
207 | 29 |
f122
Rural Households Reporting Access to Electricity (% of rural households)
* Percent distribution of households that have electricity, according to urban-rural residence. * The data was placed in the latest year when the survey covered 2 calendar years (e.g. Bangladesh 1993/94). |
207 | 29 |
f123
Urban Households Reporting Access to Electricity (% of urban households)
* Percent distribution of households that have electricity, according to urban-rural residence. * The data was placed in the latest year when the survey covered 2 calendar years (e.g. Bangladesh 1993/94). |
207 | 29 |
f130
Energy use per PPP GDP (kg of oil equivalent per constant 2000 PPP 1000$)
|
207 | 29 |
f141
Electricity End-user Prices for Households (US cents/kWh)
|
207 | 29 |
f142
Electricity End-user Prices for Industry (US cents/kWh)
* ERRA prices are for non-residential customers and they were treated as prices for industry |
207 | 29 |
f150
Commercial Perception of Electricity Service
1=worse than most other countries 7=it is equal to the highest in the world (index based on quality perception) * Question 6.05 in the 2002 GCR: Rank from 1 to 7 the quality of electricity supply in your country (in terms of lack of interruptions and lack of voltage fluctuations. 1 = it is worse than most other countries. 7 = it is equal to the highest in the world |
207 | 29 |
f160
Commercial Perception of Public Agency Electricity Provider
1=very bad 7=very good (index based on quality perception) * Question: How would you rate the quality and efficiency of the following public services? Power * Rank: 1=very bad. 7=very good. * The measures presented in the following spreadsheets are derived from the 1999 BEEPS and are subject to a margin of error. * The direction of the scale was changed to make it comparable to GCR indexes. In the original data 1= very good. For this data 1= very bad. In addition, the data was normalized to base 7. |
207 | 29 |
f170
Electric Power Transmission and Distribution Losses (% of output)
|
207 | 29 |
f211
Improved water source (% of population with access)
* Caroline van den Berg: even though WHO published data as of 2000, the 2002 data must be considered an update of the 2000, as opposed to an additional year. * The reason is every data point is estimated through a regression with the data available from different hh surveys. If a new hh survey becomes available, new estimates are calculated using all data available per country. |
207 | 29 |
f212
Improved water source, rural (% of rural population with access)
* Caroline van den Berg: even though WHO published data as of 2000, the 2002 data must be considered an update of the 2000, as opposed to an additional year. * The reason is every data point is estimated through a regression with the data available from different hh surveys. If a new hh survey becomes available, new estimates are calculated using all data available per country. |
207 | 29 |
f213
Improved water source, urban (% of urban population with access)
* Caroline van den Berg: even though WHO published data as of 2000, the 2002 data must be considered an update of the 2000, as opposed to an additional year. * The reason is every data point is estimated through a regression with the data available from different hh surveys. If a new hh survey becomes available, new estimates are calculated using all data available per country. |
207 | 29 |
f221
Improved sanitation facilities (% of population with access)
* Caroline van den Berg: even though WHO published data as of 2000, the 2002 data must be considered an update of the 2000, as opposed to an additional year. * The reason is every data point is estimated through a regression with the data available from different hh surveys. If a new hh survey becomes available, new estimates are calculated using all data available per country. |
207 | 29 |
f222
Improved sanitation facilities, rural (% of rural population with access)
* Caroline van den Berg: even though WHO published data as of 2000, the 2002 data must be considered an update of the 2000, as opposed to an additional year. * The reason is every data point is estimated through a regression with the data available from different hh surveys. If a new hh survey becomes available, new estimates are calculated using all data available per country. |
207 | 29 |
f223
Improved sanitation facilities, urban (% of urban population with access)
* Caroline van den Berg: even though WHO published data as of 2000, the 2002 data must be considered an update of the 2000, as opposed to an additional year. * The reason is every data point is estimated through a regression with the data available from different hh surveys. If a new hh survey becomes available, new estimates are calculated using all data available per country. |
207 | 29 |
f230
Commercial Perception of Water Service
1= worst 7=best (index based on quality perception). * Question: How would you rate the quality and efficiency of the following public services? Water * Rank: 1=very bad. 7=very good. * The measures presented in the following spreadsheets are derived from the 1999 BEEPS and are subject to a margin of error. * The direction and the base of the original scale was changed to make it comparable to GCR indexes. In the original data 6= very bad. For this data 7= very good. |
207 | 29 |
f241
Households using piped or well water as major source of drinking water, total (% households)
* The data was placed in the latest year when the survey covered 2 calendar years (e.g. Bangladesh 1993/94). |
207 | 29 |
f242
Households using piped or well water as major source of drinking water, rural (% households)
* The data was placed in the latest year when the survey covered 2 calendar years (e.g. Bangladesh 1993/94). |
207 | 29 |
f243
Households using piped or well water as major source of drinking water, urban (% households)
* The data was placed in the latest year when the survey covered 2 calendar years (e.g. Bangladesh 1993/94). |
207 | 29 |
f310
Telephone Subscribers (per 1000 inhabitants)
|
207 | 29 |
f320
Main Telephone Lines Subscribers (per 1000 inhabitants)
|
207 | 29 |
f330
Cellular Telephone Subscribers (per 1000 inhabitants)
|
207 | 29 |
f340
Mainlines per 1000 inhabitants outside largest city
|
207 | 29 |
f351
Households with Own Telephone (% of households)
* The data was placed in the latest year when the survey covered 2 calendar years (e.g. Bangladesh 1999/2000 information was placed in 2000). |
207 | 29 |
f352
Rural Households with Own Telephone (% of rural households)
* The data was placed in the latest year when the survey covered 2 calendar years (e.g. Bangladesh 1999/2000 information was placed in 2000). |
207 | 29 |
f353
Urban Households with Own Telephone (% of urban households)
|
207 | 29 |
f360
Cost of Local Phone Call (US¢ per 3 min)
|
207 | 29 |
f370
Cost of Phone Call to the US (US cents per 3 min)
|
207 | 29 |
f380
Cost of Cellular Local Call (US cents per 3 off-peak min)
|
207 | 29 |
f390
Commercial perception of telephone/fax infrastructure quality
1= Scarce and difficult to obtain. 7 = Widely available and highly reliable ( index based on quality perception) * Question 6.07 in the 2002 GCR: New telephone lines for your business are: 1= Scarce and difficult to obtain. 7 = Widely available and highly reliable. |
207 | 29 |
f410
Road density, population (road-km/1000 people)
|
207 | 29 |
f420
Road density, land (road-km/1000 sq km)
|
207 | 29 |
f430
Rail density, population (rail-km/1000 people)
|
207 | 29 |
f440
Rail density, land (rail-km/1000 sq km)
|
207 | 29 |
f450
Freight Revenue PPP per ton-km (ICP)
|
207 | 29 |
f460
Passenger Revenue (PPP per pass-km (ICP))
|
207 | 29 |
f470
Travel Time to Work in Main Cities (minutes/one-way work trip)
* In order to aggregate data at the country level we used simple averages of cities' travel time to work, even though the list of cities was not exhaustive. A more accurate approach, should more data becomes available, would be to use averages weighted b |
207 | 29 |
f480
Commercial Perception of Services Delivered by the Roads Department/Public Works
1=very bad 7=very good (index based on quality perception) |
207 | 29 |
f490
Commercial Perception of Port Facilities
1=underdeveloped 7=as developed as the world's best (index based on quality perception) * Question 4.11 in GCR 1996: Port access infrastructure meets business requirements very well 1 = strongly disagree 6 = strongly agree. Then the scale was converted to a base 7. * Question 4.05 in GCR 1997: Port facilities and inland waters are extensive and efficient 1 = strongly disagree 7 = strongly agree. * Question 4.06 in GCR 1999: Port facilities and inland waters are extensive and efficient 1 = strongly disagree 7 = strongly agree. * Question 5.05 in GCR 2000: Port facilities and inland waters are extensive and efficient 1 = strongly disagree 7 = strongly agree. * Question 6.03 in GCR 2002: Rank from 1 to 7 port facilities and inland waterways in your country. 1 = underdeveloped. 7 = as developed as the world's best. |
207 | 29 |
f3100
Commercial perception of availability of mobile or cellular telephone
1= Not available. 7 = As accessible and affordable as in the world's most technologically advance countries (index based on quality perception) * Question 6.08 in the 2002 GCR: Mobile or cellular telephones for your business are: 1= Not available. 7 = As accessible and affordable as in the world's most technologically advance countries. |
207 | 29 |
f3110
Commercial perception internet access in schools
1= Very limited. 7 = Pervasive - most children have frequent access (index based on quality perception) * Question 6.09 in the 2002 GCR: Internet access in schools is: 1= Very limited. 7 = Pervasive - most children have frequent access. |
207 | 29 |
f3120
Commercial perception of postal efficiency
1 = Not at all. 7 = Yes, trust them entirely (index based on quality perception) * Question 6.09 in the 2002 GCR: Do you trust your country's postal system sufficiently to have a friend mail a small package worth $100 to you? 1 = Not at all. 7 = Yes, trust them entirely. |
207 | 29 |
f3130
Phone Faults (reported faults/100 mainlines)
|
207 | 29 |
f3140
Unmet demand (% of main telephone lines in operation)
|
207 | 29 |
f4100
Commercial Perception of Railroad Services
1= underdeveloped 7= as extensive and efficient as the world's best (index based on quality perception) * Question 6.02 in GCR 2002: Rank from 1 to 7 the railroads in your country. 1 = underdeveloped. 7 = as extensive and efficient as the world's best. |
207 | 29 |
f4110
Commercial Perception of Air Transport Services
1= infrequent and inefficient 7= as extensive and efficient as the world's best (index based on quality perception) * Question 6.04 in GCR 2002: Rank from 1 to 7 air transport in your country. 1 = infrequent and inefficient. 7 = as extensive and efficient as the world's best. |
207 | 29 |
f4120
Paved Roads (% of total roads)
|
207 | 29 |
This site uses cookies to optimize functionality and give you the best possible experience. If you continue to navigate this website beyond this page, cookies will be placed on your browser. To learn more about cookies, click here.