GEO_2022_SAH_v01_M_v01_A_ESS
Survey of Agricultural Holdings 2022
SAH 2022
Name | Country code |
---|---|
Georgia | GEO |
Agricultural Survey [ag/oth]
Sample survey data [ssd]
Agricultural holding – economic unit of agricultural production under single management comprising all livestock kept and all land used wholly or partly for agricultural production purposes, without regard to title, legal form or size in which agricultural activities are conducted under the supervision of a holder, who is responsible for making decisions and takes all economic risks and expenses related to agricultural activities.
Statistical information on sheep and goats, as well as the production of melons, and watermelons is collected separately based on the special questionnaire. The source of these statistics is the administrative units of the Municipalities of Georgia. Information on tea leaf production is obtained from the legal entities specialized in crude tea leaf processing.
Entire country (Georgia), excluding occupied regions (Abkhazia and Tskhinvali region)
Survey sampling frame includes about 642,000 agriculture holdings (households and agricultural enterprises) operated in country. The Agricultural Census 2014 is the main source of the sample frame. Sampling frame is updated on a permanent basis in according to the results of survey of agricultural holdings, business register and different administrative sources.
Name |
---|
National Statistics Office of Georgia (Geostat) |
Name | Role |
---|---|
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations | Technical Support |
Name | Abbreviation | Role |
---|---|---|
National Statistics Office of Georgia | Geostat | Funding |
50x2030 Initiative (www.50x2030.org) | 50x2030 | Technical and Financial Assistance |
• Main Source of the sample frame since 2016 - Agricultural Census 2014;
• Sample frame contained 642,000 holding - sample size 12,000 (1.9%);
• Sample Design: two-stage stratified cluster random sampling;
In the 2022 fourth quarter, 1,349 holdings were not surveyed, due to the fact that some holdings refused to be interviewed or were not found during the fieldwork despite its existence. This is about 10.7% of the total sampled holdings of 12,589 holdings involved in the sample 2022 fourth quarter.
The survey of agriculture holdings uses a rotation design basis. Every sampled cluster, excluding clusters of extra-large holdings, belongs to one of three rotation group. This kind of approach implies to keep a holding in the sample for about three years and after this time replace it by another holding from the same stratum. The initially selected holdings will not necessarily stay in the survey for three years. In 2017, holdings of the first rotation group were substituted, in 2018 - holdings of the second rotation group, and in 2019 - holdings of the third rotation group. Extra-large holdings will participate without being substituted. Every year approximately 4000 holdings out of 12000 holdings selected a year before being changed. Newly introduced holdings will belong to the same rotation group which its predecessor belonged to.
At First, initial weights of selected holdings from s-th stratum will be calculated: Ws,0=Ns/ns
Where Ns is the number of holdings, and ns - number of selected holdings in s-th stratum.
In the strata of small, medium and large holdings, all the interviewed holdings of s-th stratum will have the following weight assigned: Ws,1=(Ns-usWs,0)rs
Where rs is the number of responses in s-th stratum, and us is the number of selected holdings in the stratum that do not exist.
In extra-large holding strata the difference between holdings with respect to their sizes might be very large and distributing the weights of non-responses on interviewed holdings might give misleading results. Because of this, in order to weight the holdings of this size, post-stratification should be done. At first, the main specialization of all holdings should be determined. That is, the crop type (or type of animals/poultry) which makes up the bulk of holding's ACI should be determined. All the extra-large holdings of the country should be grouped according to their main specializations. The holdings, ACI of which exceeds 300 should be grouped together separately from other holdings. The latter stratum should also include all the other extra-large holdings which have a unique specialization countrywide. The interviewed holdings of this stratum should have final weights set to their initial weights (Ws,0=1), and the holdings which exist but were not interviewed for some reason, should have their data filled in through some method (imputation, results of previous survey, or data obtained from other sources). All of these cases should be considered individually. In the rest of the extra-large holdings weighting should be carried out as it is done in the case of small, medium and large holdings.
After forming the sample initial weights were calculated. Afterwards, the accuracy of estimates (obtained from selected holdings) for the parameters from the database was calculated.
Detailed information on structure, and sections of questionnaires used in the survey of agricultural holdings are available in following link: https://www.geostat.ge/en/modules/categories/564/questionnaires-Agricultural-Statistics
Statistical Disclosure Control (SDC): Microdata are disseminated as Public Use Files under the terms indicated in Geostat Rule on Access to Confidential Data for Scientific and Research Purposes (available at: https://www.geostat.ge/media/61533/Rule-on-Access-to-Confidential-Datafor-Scientific-and-Research-Purposes....pdf).
This rule indicates that the users must comply with the following conditions:
Not to attempt to identify a natural/legal person in any way (including by comparing this data with other individual data).
Not to disclose individual data to a third party (person) other than the parties to the agreement, and/or not to use this data for a purpose other than the purpose specified in the relevant request.
Not to disclose aggregated data obtained from individual data that can be used to identify a statistical unit indirectly.
To destroy individual data upon completion of the scientific and research project.
In addition, anonymization methods have been applied to the microdata files to protect the confidentiality of the individual data collected. These methods include: i) removal of information that may directly identify a respondent (name, address, phone number, etc.), ii) grouping values of some variables into categories (e.g. age), iii) limiting geographical information to the region level, iv) suppression of some data points for variables that, in combination with others, may pose a relevant risk of identification of a statistical unit, v) grouping agricultural holdings with extreme values into aggregates, etc. In the latter case, agricultural holdings with extreme values in certain numerical variables were merged together into aggregated records. Their code starts with “aggreg”, followed by random numbers of six digits. Non aggregated records have a code starting with “single” and represent single holdings.
Users must be aware that the data protection with SDC methods involves modifying the data, including suppression of some data points. It may therefore have unwanted consequences, such as sampling error and bias. It should be noted that the impact of anonymization on these data was generally stronger on the smaller subpopulations, and for this reason data by region were more distorted than national totals, and data from enterprises were much more impacted than data from family holdings (given that the number of holdings in the enterprises category is much lower).
Start | End | Cycle |
---|---|---|
2022-01-11 | 2022-01-31 | Inception Survey |
2022-04-01 | 2022-04-12 | I Q survey |
2022-07-01 | 2022-07-12 | II Q survey |
2022-10-01 | 2022-10-12 | III Q survey |
2023-01-11 | 2023-01-22 | IV Q (Final) survey |
From 2006 to 2017 data for the Survey of Agriculture Holdings were collected using paper-based questionnaires, while since 2018 data are collected using tablet-based computer-assisted personal interviewing (CAPI) methods. In case of agricultural enterprises data are collected via online questionnaires CAWI- Computer Assisted Web-interviewing).
After the field work, cleaning and harmonization of all inquiries are established at the Geostat head office - logical and arithmetical inconsistencies, as well as non-typical and suspicious data are detected, checked and corrected. Verification of the data is performed by contacting the respondents by phone. If verification with respondent is impossible, different imputation methods are used. Finally, indicators are calculated using weighted data. The obtained results are compared with corresponding results of the previous periods. In case of significant differences, the possible causes are identified and analyzed.
Is signing of a confidentiality declaration required? | Confidentiality declaration text |
---|---|
yes |
1. The Law of Georgia on Official Statistics:
- According to the article 5 of the law individual data collected or received by the producer of official statistics, relating to natural or legal persons, must be strictly confidential and used only for statistical purposes.
- According to the article 34 (Observing Confidentiality of Statistical Data) of the law.
1. Data collected, processed, and stored to produce official statistics are confidential if they enable the direct or indirect identification of a statistical unit. In addition, aggregated data are subject to statistical confidentiality:
a) Aggregates composed of 1 to 3 units, when the unit is a natural or legal person if one of these units could be identified indirectly, thereby disclosing individual data about this unit. Aggregates composed of more than 3 units may be declared confidential by the Executive Director if required to ensure statistical confidentiality
b) Information declares as a state secret on the basis of the "Law of Georgia on State Secrets".
2. Statistical data about the administrative body cannot be considered confidential information, except for the information determined by the Law of Georgia "On State Secrets".
3. For official statistics, it is obligatory to destroy or store separately the identity data including the questionnaires containing such data and used for statistical surveys according to the rules defined in the Georgian legislation.
4. Individual data obtained from publicly available sources, which are defined as public information in accordance with the legislation of Georgia, shall not be considered confidential information.
5. Confidential (individual) data may be published if there is written consent from the statistical unit regarding the publication of such data.
6. It is not allowed to disseminate and distribute confidential data or use it for non-statistical purposes.
- According to the article 38 (Confidentiality commitments) of the law the confidential statistical data collected and processed for the purpose of statistical survey shall not be used or disseminated by the employees of the producers of Official Statistics.
https://www.geostat.ge/media/56202/The-Law-of-Georgia-on-Official-Statistics.pdf
2. Data Confidentiality Policy at Geostat |
Data Confidentiality Policy at Geostat
https://www.geostat.ge/media/20860/Data-Confidentiality-Policy-at-Geostat_En.pdf
Rule on Access to Confidential Data for Scientific and Research Purposes
https://geostat.ge/media/61533/Rule-on-Access-to-Confidential-Data-for-Scientific-and-Research-Purposes....pdf
https://geostat.ge/media/61535/Annex-1_Registration-application_Geostat_En.docx
Name | Affiliation | |
---|---|---|
Giorgi Sanadze | Head of Agriculture and Environment Department at Geostat | gsanadze@geostat.ge |
DDI_GEO_2022_SAH_v01_M_v01_A_ESS_FAO
Name | Abbreviation | Affiliation | Role |
---|---|---|---|
National Statistics of Georgia | GEOSTAT | Metadata producer | |
Dissemination and Outreach Team, Statistics Division | Food and Agriculture Orgnaization | Metadata adapted for FAM | |
Development Economics Data Group | DECDG | The World Bank | Metadata adapted for World Bank Microdata Library |
Identical to a metadata (GEO_2022_SAH_v01_EN_M_v01_A_ESS) published on FAO microdata repository (https://microdata.fao.org/index.php/catalog). Some of the metadata fields have been edited.
This site uses cookies to optimize functionality and give you the best possible experience. If you continue to navigate this website beyond this page, cookies will be placed on your browser. To learn more about cookies, click here.