Ceara Teacher Feedback Program Impact Evaluation 2014
Baseline Survey

Brazil, 2014

Get Microdata

Reference ID

BRA_2014_CTFPIE-BL_v01_M

DOI

https://doi.org/10.48529/x9w3-q674

Producer(s)

Barbara Bruns

Collection(s)

The Strategic Impact Evaluation Fund (SIEF)

Metadata

Documentation in PDF DDI/XML JSON

Created on

Mar 09, 2023

Last modified

Mar 09, 2023

Page views

20894

Downloads

1282

Data file: director

The dataset contains information from "School Principal's Questionnaire"

Cases:	31725
Variables:	43

Variables

code_crede

Crede code (Coordenadoria Regional de Desenvolvimento da Educacao)

code_munic

Municipality code

code_school

School code (Censo MEC)

treat

Treatment school

dir_q1

DIR 1. Questionnaire number

dir_q2

DIR 2. Survey Date

dir_q5

DIR 5.1 Number of teachers (efetivos)

dir_q6

DIR 6. What is the criteria for conformation of classes

dir_q7p1

DIR 7.1 This year, what were the main criteria for the distribution of classes t

dir_q7p2

DIR 7.2 This year, what were the main criteria for the distribution of classes t

dir_q8

DIR 8. Who do you consider to have the greatest responsability for student learn

dir_q9

DIR 9. How structured or standarized is the classrooom planning and educational

dir_q10

DIR 10. How do you monitor and ensure consistent quality across classrooms?

dir_q11

DIR 11. What tools and resources are provided to teachers to ensure a consist le

dir_q12p1

DIR 12.1 Percentage of time is spent on Administrative tasks and reports

dir_q12p2

DIR 12.2 Percentage of time is spent on Observing teachers in the classroom

dir_q12p3

DIR 12.3 Percentage of time is spent on Dealing with parents and community membe

dir_q12p4

DIR 12.4 Percentage of time is spent on Trying to seek additional resources for

dir_q12p5

DIR 12.5 Percentage of time is spent on Strategic Planning

dir_q12p6

DIR 12.6 Percentage of time is spent on Other activities not mentioned

dir_q13p1

DIR 13.1 Level of agreement: The results of this school have improved in the las

dir_q13p2

DIR 13.2 Level of agreement: The ENEM is well-designed to reflect student learni

dir_q13p3

DIR 13.3 Level of agreement: The SPAECE is well-designed to reflect student lear

dir_q13p4

DIR 13.4 Level of agreement: I have the resources and tools they need to deal wi

dir_q13p5

DIR 13.5 Level of agreement: The teachers in this school are equally effective

dir_q13p6

DIR 13.6 Level of agreement: If I could reward my best teachers with higher sala

dir_q13p7

DIR 13.7 Level of agreement: If I could subsistute the teachers with lower perfo

dir_q13p8

DIR 13.8 Level of agreement: Having annual and clear goals of IDEB has improved

dir_q13p9

DIR 13.9 Level of agreement: The IDEB goals of this school are unrealistic and u

dir_q13p10

DIR 13.10 Level of agreement: Most teachers of this school use creative teaching

dir_q13p11

DIR 13.11 Level of agreement: Students of this school are not oriented to improv

dir_q13p12

DIR 13.12 Level of agreement: Parents of children in this community are very inv

dir_q13p13

DIR 13.13 Level of agreement: Delays and lack of teachers are serious problems i

dir_q13p14

DIR 13.14 Level of agreement: Lack of learning materials is a serious problem at

dir_q13p15

DIR 13.15 Level of agreement: Crime in our community is a serious problem for ou

dir_q14p1

DIR 14.1 Constraints to improving results: Lack of financial resources

dir_q14p2

DIR 14.2 Constraints to improving results: Lack of time to do planning

dir_q14p3

DIR 14.3 Constraints to improving results: Lack of time for teachers to work tog

dir_q14p4

DIR 14.4 Constraints to improving results: Lack of time to devote to pedagogic i

dir_q14p5

DIR 14.5 Constraints to improving results: Lack of teachers

dir_q14p6

DIR 14.6 Constraints to improving results: Lack of family support

dir_q14p7

DIR 14.7 Constraints to improving results: Lack of community support

dir_q14p8

DIR 14.8 Constraints to improving results: Lack of support from the Secretariat

Total: 43

Back to Catalog