District and Commune Health Facility Survey 2015
Viet Nam, 2015
Get Microdata
Reference ID
VNM_2015_DCHFS_v01_M
Producer(s)
Gabriel Demombynes, Kari Hurt
Metadata
Created on
Nov 23, 2016
Last modified
Oct 26, 2023
Page views
179765
Downloads
546124
- Data files
- chsm1_labeled
- chsm2_labeled
- chsm3_labeled
- chsm4_labeled
- chsm5_labeled
- chsm6a_labeled
- chsm6b_labeled
- chsm10_labeled
- chsm11_labeled
- commune_administrative_code
- commune_gps
- commune_poverty
- distm1_labeled
- distm2_labeled
- distm3_labeled
- distm4_labeled
- distm5_labeled
- distm6a_labeled
- distm6b_labeled
- distm7_labeled
- distm8_labeled
- distm9_labeled
- distm10_labeled
- distm11_labeled
- district_administrative_code
- district_gps
- district_poverty
Province name with 7 categories (Hanoi was separated to urban and rural (province_name2)
Data file: district_administrative_code
Overview
Valid:
78
Invalid:
0
Type:
Discrete
Width:
11
Range:
-
Format:
character
Questions and instructions
Categories
| Value | Category | Cases | |
|---|---|---|---|
| BINH DINH | 11 |
14.1%
|
|
| DAK LAK | 10 |
12.8%
|
|
| DIEN BIEN | 10 |
12.8%
|
|
| DONG NAI | 9 |
11.5%
|
|
| DONG THAP | 11 |
14.1%
|
|
| RURAL HANOI | 18 |
23.1%
|
|
| URBAN HANOI | 9 |
11.5%
|
Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.